The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20012, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.28 percent of the residents in 20012 has some form of health insurance. 37.99 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20012 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,337 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20012. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,989 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,425 health care providers accessible to residents in 20012, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20012, Washington, District of Columbia
Breast Cancer Score | 68 |
---|---|
People Score | 25 |
Provider Score | 100 |
Hospital Score | 26 |
Travel Score | 67 |
20012 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below focuses on breast cancer care quality within the context of primary care availability in Washington, D.C., specifically examining physicians practicing in the 20012 ZIP code. This evaluation considers factors crucial to patient outcomes, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape and highlight areas of strength and opportunity.
The 20012 ZIP code, encompassing the Takoma Park and Brightwood neighborhoods, presents a microcosm of healthcare access challenges and opportunities. Analyzing breast cancer care requires looking beyond simple metrics. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A higher ratio of primary care physicians (PCPs) to residents generally indicates better access to preventative care, including early breast cancer screenings. However, this ratio alone doesn't tell the whole story. The availability of specialists, particularly oncologists and surgeons, is equally important. A low PCP-to-patient ratio, coupled with limited specialist access, can create significant hurdles for patients navigating a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment journey.
Standout practices within 20012, and indeed throughout Washington, D.C., are those that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive breast cancer care. This includes not only early detection through mammography and other screening methods but also a coordinated approach to diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials, offering patients access to cutting-edge therapies, are highly valued. Furthermore, practices that prioritize patient education and support groups contribute significantly to improved patient outcomes and quality of life. These practices often have dedicated nurse navigators who guide patients through the complexities of the healthcare system, ensuring they receive timely and appropriate care.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly impact breast cancer care, particularly in areas with limited access to specialists. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with oncologists and other specialists remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving access to care. The effectiveness of telemedicine, however, hinges on several factors, including the availability of reliable internet access, the patient's comfort with technology, and the ability of physicians to conduct thorough examinations remotely. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring, are likely to be highly rated in terms of patient convenience and access.
The integration of mental health resources into breast cancer care is increasingly recognized as essential. A breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally and psychologically challenging. Anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues are common among breast cancer patients. Practices that offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral networks with mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. These resources are crucial for supporting patients through the emotional roller coaster of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery.
Primary care availability across Washington, D.C., is a crucial factor influencing breast cancer care outcomes. The city's healthcare landscape is diverse, with varying levels of access to primary care services across different neighborhoods. Areas with a shortage of PCPs may experience delays in diagnosis and treatment, as patients struggle to obtain timely referrals to specialists. Public health initiatives aimed at increasing the number of PCPs and improving access to primary care services are critical for ensuring equitable breast cancer care throughout the city.
The quality of breast cancer care is also influenced by the availability of support services. These services can range from financial assistance programs to support groups and survivorship programs. Practices that connect patients with these resources, helping them navigate the non-medical aspects of their cancer journey, are highly valued. These services can significantly improve patient quality of life and reduce the burden of treatment.
Evaluating the quality of breast cancer care requires a multifaceted approach. It's not simply about the number of physicians or the availability of technology. It's about the entire patient experience, from early detection and diagnosis to treatment, survivorship, and emotional support. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, embracing innovation and integrating mental health resources, are likely to achieve the best outcomes.
The specific practices in the 20012 ZIP code should be evaluated based on the criteria mentioned above. This involves assessing the physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. A thorough evaluation will identify the strengths and weaknesses of each practice, providing valuable information for patients seeking breast cancer care.
Furthermore, the broader healthcare landscape in Washington, D.C., must be considered. The city's demographics, socioeconomic factors, and access to care all play a role in breast cancer outcomes. Addressing disparities in access to care and ensuring that all residents have the opportunity to receive timely and appropriate breast cancer screening and treatment is a critical public health priority.
The ideal healthcare system provides a seamless experience for patients. This means easy access to primary care, timely referrals to specialists, coordinated care, and comprehensive support services. Practices that excel in these areas are likely to be highly regarded by patients and healthcare professionals alike.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in the 20012 ZIP code and across Washington, D.C., and to identify the best practices for breast cancer care, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, access to care, and other relevant data points.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like