20016, Washington, District of Columbia Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20016, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.90 percent of the residents in 20016 has some form of health insurance. 22.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 90.69 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20016 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 7,839 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20016. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,844 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,312 health care providers accessible to residents in 20016, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20016 and Primary Care Availability in Washington, D.C.

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning breast cancer care, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on physicians within ZIP code 20016, a prominent area in Washington, D.C., and the broader context of primary care availability across the city. A "Breast Cancer Score" is a hypothetical construct, a composite metric built upon factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized breast cancer services, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.

The physician landscape in 20016 presents a mixed picture. This area, encompassing neighborhoods like Georgetown and parts of the Palisades, boasts a relatively affluent population, often leading to higher concentrations of specialists. However, this doesn't automatically translate to optimal breast cancer care. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is crucial. PCPs are the initial point of contact, responsible for screening, early detection, and referrals. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can hinder timely diagnosis and treatment. Data on physician-to-patient ratios needs to be assessed carefully, accounting for factors like age distribution, insurance coverage, and the presence of underserved populations within the ZIP code.

Standout practices within 20016 and the broader Washington, D.C. area are those that demonstrate a comprehensive approach to breast cancer care. This includes not just diagnostic capabilities (mammography, ultrasound, MRI) but also access to oncologists, surgeons specializing in breast cancer, and radiation therapy facilities. Practices that excel in patient navigation, guiding individuals through the complexities of diagnosis and treatment, are invaluable. Furthermore, the availability of genetic counseling and testing for individuals with a family history of breast cancer is a critical component of a robust breast cancer care system.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Practices that offer virtual consultations for initial assessments, follow-up appointments, and even support groups can significantly improve patient convenience and access to care. Telemedicine can be especially beneficial for patients with mobility issues or those living in areas with limited access to specialists. A high "Breast Cancer Score" would reflect widespread telemedicine adoption, ensuring patients can receive timely advice and support regardless of their location.

The integration of mental health resources is a crucial, often overlooked, aspect of breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally and psychologically challenging. Practices that offer access to therapists, counselors, and support groups, either in-house or through referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. This includes addressing issues like anxiety, depression, and body image concerns, which are common among breast cancer patients. The "Breast Cancer Score" should reflect the availability and accessibility of these mental health services.

Primary care availability across Washington, D.C. significantly impacts breast cancer outcomes. A city-wide shortage of PCPs can lead to delayed screenings and late-stage diagnoses. This is particularly concerning for underserved communities, which may face additional barriers to accessing healthcare, such as lack of transportation, language barriers, or limited insurance coverage. The "Breast Cancer Score" for Washington, D.C. would be negatively impacted by low primary care physician availability and disparities in access to care.

Evaluating the "Breast Cancer Score" for 20016 and the city as a whole requires a thorough data analysis. This includes gathering data from various sources, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), state health departments, and insurance providers. Analyzing physician directories, patient reviews, and practice websites can provide insights into the services offered, the qualifications of the physicians, and the patient experience.

The analysis should also consider the presence of community outreach programs and educational initiatives. Practices that actively engage in community education, promoting breast cancer awareness and providing information on screening guidelines, contribute to earlier detection and improved outcomes. Partnerships with local organizations and community health centers can further expand access to care for underserved populations.

The "Breast Cancer Score" is not simply a numerical value. It's a reflection of the overall quality and accessibility of breast cancer care within a specific geographic area. It's a measure of how well the healthcare system supports patients from initial screening to survivorship. This score should be dynamic, constantly updated to reflect changes in healthcare practices, technological advancements, and community needs.

In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of breast cancer care in 20016 and Washington, D.C. requires a deep dive into physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialized services, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The "Breast Cancer Score" is a valuable tool for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system and identifying areas for improvement.

**To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and access to care, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations that can help you analyze data on physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and demographic information, providing a more comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape.**