20036, Washington, District of Columbia Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.35 percent of the residents in 20036 has some form of health insurance. 11.72 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 91.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20036 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 88 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20036. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 624 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,221 health care providers accessible to residents in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Physicians in ZIP Code 20036 and Primary Care Availability in Washington, D.C.

This analysis examines the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 20036, a prominent area of Washington, D.C., and the broader context of primary care availability in the city. The goal is to assess the accessibility and quality of care, considering factors relevant to breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and support. We will evaluate physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, analyze telemedicine adoption, and explore the availability of mental health resources.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 20036, while seemingly robust due to its concentration of medical professionals, requires careful consideration. This area, encompassing a significant portion of downtown D.C., is not solely residential. It includes a large daytime workforce, government buildings, and tourist destinations. Therefore, the actual patient pool for primary care and specialist services is likely larger than the resident population suggests. Furthermore, the presence of major hospitals and specialized clinics skews the ratio, potentially creating an illusion of abundance. The critical factor is the *accessibility* of these resources for residents and those working in the area.

Several practices within 20036 stand out for their commitment to breast cancer care. These practices often integrate a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and support staff. Some clinics are affiliated with larger hospital systems, offering access to cutting-edge technology and clinical trials. Others are smaller, community-focused practices that prioritize personalized care and patient navigation. The success of these practices is measured not just by the number of patients treated, but by patient outcomes, satisfaction scores, and the integration of preventative care programs.

Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important in healthcare, and its impact on breast cancer care is significant. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to specialists regardless of geographic limitations. In 20036, the adoption rate varies. Some practices have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments for follow-ups, medication management, and even initial consultations. Others are slower to adopt, citing concerns about patient privacy, the need for in-person examinations, and the technical infrastructure required. The availability of telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues, those living far from clinics, or those seeking second opinions.

The integration of mental health resources is a crucial aspect of breast cancer care. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health support, such as therapy, counseling, and support groups, can significantly improve patients' quality of life and overall well-being. Practices in 20036 vary in their approach to mental health. Some have dedicated mental health professionals on staff, while others offer referrals to external providers. The level of integration and coordination between medical and mental health services is a key indicator of quality of care.

Primary care availability in Washington, D.C., is a critical factor influencing breast cancer care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a vital role in screening, early detection, and referral to specialists. The availability of PCPs and their ability to provide timely and comprehensive care directly impacts the outcomes of breast cancer treatment. Challenges include physician shortages, particularly in underserved communities, and the increasing demands on PCPs' time. Initiatives to improve primary care access, such as expanding insurance coverage, promoting telehealth, and incentivizing primary care practices, are essential for ensuring that all residents have access to the preventative care and early detection services they need.

The analysis of breast cancer care in 20036 reveals a complex landscape. While the area benefits from a concentration of medical resources, accessibility and integration of services remain key considerations. The physician-to-patient ratio needs to be interpreted with caution, considering the diverse population and the influx of patients from outside the immediate area. Standout practices are distinguished by their multidisciplinary approach, patient-centered care, and the integration of technology. Telemedicine adoption, while increasing, is not uniform, and further expansion is needed to improve access. The availability of mental health resources is crucial, and practices that prioritize integration and coordination between medical and mental health services are better positioned to support patients. Primary care availability is a critical factor, and efforts to improve access to PCPs are essential for early detection and optimal outcomes.

The overall "Breast Cancer Score" for 20036 is thus nuanced. While the area benefits from a high concentration of medical expertise, the score is influenced by factors such as accessibility, integration of services, and the availability of mental health resources. The score is dynamic and can be improved through initiatives that address these challenges.

For a visual understanding of the distribution of healthcare resources, the location of specialist practices, and the areas with higher primary care access, we encourage you to explore interactive mapping tools.
**Click here to explore the Breast Cancer Care landscape in Washington, D.C. with CartoChrome maps.**