20037, Washington, District of Columbia Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20037, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.86 percent of the residents in 20037 has some form of health insurance. 15.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 90.08 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20037 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 608 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20037. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,603 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,304 health care providers accessible to residents in 20037, Washington, District of Columbia.

The following analysis provides a comprehensive overview of breast cancer care within the constraints of publicly available data, focusing on physicians in ZIP code 20037 and primary care availability in Washington, D.C. The goal is to offer insights into the landscape of care, highlighting key factors impacting patient outcomes and access. It is important to note that this analysis is based on available data and does not constitute medical advice.

ZIP code 20037, encompassing a significant portion of the Georgetown neighborhood, presents a unique demographic profile. The area is characterized by a relatively affluent population, with a high level of education and access to healthcare. Analyzing breast cancer care in this specific ZIP code requires an understanding of the resources available within the immediate vicinity, as well as the broader healthcare ecosystem of Washington, D.C.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator of healthcare access. In 20037, the concentration of medical facilities, including hospitals and specialty clinics, suggests a potentially favorable physician-to-patient ratio compared to other areas of the city. However, this does not guarantee equitable access. Factors such as insurance coverage, appointment availability, and physician specialization all influence a patient's ability to receive timely and appropriate care. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the D.C. Department of Health can provide some insights into these ratios, but the data is often limited and may not reflect the full picture.

Primary care availability across Washington, D.C., is a critical determinant of breast cancer outcomes. Early detection through regular screenings, such as mammograms, is paramount. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a vital role in coordinating care, referring patients for screenings, and providing ongoing support. The availability of PCPs, particularly those accepting a variety of insurance plans, directly impacts the ability of individuals to access these essential services. Areas with a shortage of PCPs may experience delayed diagnoses and poorer outcomes. Data on PCP availability, including the number of physicians per capita and the acceptance of different insurance types, is crucial for assessing the overall health of the healthcare system.

Standout practices in 20037 and the surrounding areas are likely to demonstrate excellence in several key areas. These include:

* **Early Detection Programs:** Practices with robust screening programs, including easy access to mammography and other diagnostic tools, are essential.
* **Multidisciplinary Care:** The best practices often have a multidisciplinary approach, involving oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and other specialists working collaboratively to provide comprehensive care.
* **Patient Education and Support:** Providing patients with clear and accessible information about their diagnosis, treatment options, and support resources is crucial.
* **Research and Innovation:** Practices involved in clinical trials and research are often at the forefront of advancements in breast cancer treatment.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients in underserved areas or those with mobility limitations. It can also facilitate follow-up appointments, consultations, and support groups. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms and integrated them seamlessly into their care delivery models are likely to be more accessible and convenient for patients. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine depends on factors such as the availability of reliable internet access, patient comfort with technology, and the ability of physicians to provide effective care remotely.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a significant impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. Access to mental health professionals, support groups, and other resources can help patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression that often accompany a cancer diagnosis. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either through in-house providers or referrals to external resources, are better equipped to support the holistic needs of their patients. The availability of these resources in the 20037 area and across Washington, D.C., should be assessed to ensure that patients have access to the support they need.

To further assess the landscape of breast cancer care, the following data points should be analyzed:

* **Screening Rates:** Data on mammography screening rates in 20037 and across Washington, D.C., is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of early detection efforts.
* **Treatment Outcomes:** Analyzing survival rates, recurrence rates, and other outcome measures can provide insights into the quality of care provided by different practices.
* **Patient Satisfaction:** Gathering patient feedback through surveys and other means can help identify areas where care can be improved.
* **Insurance Coverage:** Assessing the acceptance of different insurance plans by physicians and practices is essential for understanding access to care.
* **Racial and Ethnic Disparities:** Analyzing data on breast cancer incidence, mortality, and treatment outcomes across different racial and ethnic groups can help identify and address disparities in care.

The complexity of healthcare data and the limitations of publicly available information make a complete and definitive "Breast Cancer Score" analysis challenging. However, by analyzing the factors outlined above, it is possible to gain a valuable understanding of the landscape of care in 20037 and Washington, D.C.

For a more detailed and interactive visualization of healthcare data, including physician locations, hospital resources, and demographic information, explore the possibilities offered by CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides a powerful platform for analyzing geospatial data and visualizing complex healthcare information, enabling a deeper understanding of the factors influencing breast cancer care.