The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.99 percent of the residents in 20064 has some form of health insurance. 8.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 93.01 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20064 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 494 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 18 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20064. An estimate of 21 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,289 health care providers accessible to residents in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia
Breast Cancer Score | 70 |
---|---|
People Score | 15 |
Provider Score | 100 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 65 |
20064 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis will be structured as follows:
* **Introduction:** Briefly introduce the purpose and scope of the analysis.
* **Breast Cancer Score for Doctors in ZIP Code 20064:** Evaluate the quality of breast cancer care in the specified ZIP code.
* **Primary Care Availability in Washington:** Assess the accessibility and quality of primary care across Washington.
* **Physician-to-Patient Ratios:** Examine the doctor-to-patient ratio in both the ZIP code and Washington state.
* **Standout Practices:** Highlight practices that excel in breast cancer care and primary care.
* **Telemedicine Adoption:** Evaluate the adoption of telemedicine in both contexts.
* **Mental Health Resources:** Assess the availability of mental health resources related to breast cancer and primary care.
* **Conclusion:** Summarize the findings and provide a call to action.
**Introduction**
This analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of breast cancer care and primary care availability, focusing on doctors practicing within ZIP code 20064 and the broader context of Washington state. The goal is to evaluate the quality of care, accessibility, and the integration of key resources, including mental health support and telemedicine, to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape. The analysis aims to offer insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare systems in these areas, helping patients and healthcare providers make informed decisions.
**Breast Cancer Score for Doctors in ZIP Code 20064**
Evaluating the quality of breast cancer care in ZIP code 20064 requires a multi-faceted approach. This involves assessing the availability of specialized oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists. Furthermore, it’s crucial to consider the accreditation status of local hospitals and cancer centers, as accreditation often reflects adherence to rigorous standards of care. The proximity to advanced diagnostic tools, such as high-resolution mammography, MRI, and PET scans, is another critical factor.
The analysis will also consider patient outcomes data, where available. This includes factors such as survival rates, recurrence rates, and the time it takes to receive a diagnosis and begin treatment. The integration of multidisciplinary care teams, involving surgeons, oncologists, radiation therapists, and support staff, is essential for comprehensive breast cancer care. The availability of genetic counseling and testing services for high-risk patients is also a key indicator of quality. The presence of breast cancer support groups and patient navigation services can significantly improve the patient experience.
**Primary Care Availability in Washington**
Assessing primary care availability across Washington state involves evaluating several key indicators. This includes the number of primary care physicians per capita, which directly impacts access to care. The geographic distribution of primary care providers is crucial, particularly in rural or underserved areas. The analysis will consider whether there are sufficient primary care doctors in the state.
The types of insurance accepted by primary care practices are also important. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, are more accessible to a broader population. The availability of same-day appointments and extended hours can also improve access to care. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals can streamline communication and improve care coordination.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios**
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric for evaluating healthcare access. In ZIP code 20064, the analysis will determine the ratio of specialists involved in breast cancer care, such as oncologists and surgeons, to the local population. This will provide insights into whether there are enough specialists to meet the needs of the community.
For Washington state, the analysis will examine the ratio of primary care physicians to the overall population. This will help determine whether there is a sufficient supply of primary care providers to meet the state's healthcare needs. Areas with lower ratios may experience longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to care.
**Standout Practices**
Identifying standout practices involves looking for those that excel in providing high-quality breast cancer care and primary care. For breast cancer care, this includes practices with a strong track record of positive patient outcomes, accreditation from reputable organizations, and a commitment to patient-centered care. Practices that offer comprehensive services, including genetic counseling, support groups, and patient navigation, are also considered exemplary.
In primary care, standout practices often prioritize patient satisfaction, offer convenient appointment scheduling, and utilize technology to improve care coordination. Practices that are recognized for their commitment to preventative care, chronic disease management, and patient education are also considered high-performing.
**Telemedicine Adoption**
Telemedicine has become increasingly important in healthcare. The analysis will assess the extent to which telemedicine is used in breast cancer care and primary care in both ZIP code 20064 and Washington state. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring services, and the use of telehealth platforms for patient education and follow-up care.
The adoption of telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine can also enhance care coordination and improve patient outcomes. The analysis will also consider the challenges associated with telemedicine adoption, such as technological barriers, insurance coverage, and patient acceptance.
**Mental Health Resources**
The integration of mental health resources is essential for comprehensive breast cancer care and primary care. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health support services for breast cancer patients, including counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care. The availability of mental health resources for primary care patients, such as access to behavioral health specialists and mental health screenings, will also be evaluated.
Mental health support is crucial for patients dealing with the emotional and psychological challenges associated with breast cancer and other health conditions. The analysis will consider the extent to which mental health services are integrated into the overall care plan.
**Conclusion**
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of breast cancer care and primary care availability in ZIP code 20064 and Washington state. The findings highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare systems in these areas. The analysis underscores the importance of factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources.
To gain a more detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape, including the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, access to care, and the availability of specific services, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping tools offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide a visual representation of healthcare resources, helping you make informed decisions about your healthcare.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like