The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20240 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20240 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20240. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,392 health care providers accessible to residents in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia
Breast Cancer Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 100 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 60 |
20240 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Washington, D.C. (ZIP Code 20240) and Primary Care Availability
This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within the 20240 ZIP code, encompassing Washington, D.C., and examines the broader context of primary care availability across the city. We aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to patients, considering factors that influence the quality and accessibility of care, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable medical practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health support. This assessment is not a simple ranking but a holistic evaluation of the healthcare ecosystem’s capacity to address the needs of individuals facing breast cancer.
The 20240 ZIP code, primarily encompassing federal government agencies and offices, presents a unique demographic. While not a residential area, its proximity to residential neighborhoods and its function as a hub for a significant workforce necessitates a careful consideration of healthcare accessibility. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a crucial starting point. PCPs serve as the initial point of contact for patients, providing preventative care, screening recommendations, and referrals to specialists, including oncologists and surgeons. The physician-to-patient ratio in the surrounding residential areas directly impacts the quality of care for those living near the 20240 zip code. A lower ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative screenings, and delayed diagnoses.
Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio requires analyzing data from various sources, including the District of Columbia Department of Health and publicly available databases. This data must be geographically specific, focusing on the areas immediately surrounding 20240, to accurately reflect the healthcare environment. The ratio alone, however, doesn’t tell the whole story. The distribution of PCPs within the area is also important. Are the physicians concentrated in specific areas, leaving other neighborhoods underserved? Are there disparities in access based on socioeconomic factors or insurance coverage? The analysis must consider these complexities to paint a complete picture.
Beyond the basic availability of PCPs, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the availability of comprehensive breast cancer screening services, such as mammograms and clinical breast exams. PCPs should be actively involved in educating patients about breast cancer risk factors and promoting early detection. The integration of these services into primary care practices significantly improves patient outcomes.
Several medical practices in and around the 20240 area are likely to stand out in the context of breast cancer care. These practices might be recognized for their commitment to patient-centered care, their adoption of advanced technologies, or their collaborations with specialized cancer centers. Identifying these standout practices requires a combination of factors, including patient reviews, peer recognition, and participation in quality improvement initiatives. For example, practices that have earned accreditation from organizations like the American College of Radiology for their mammography services demonstrate a commitment to quality.
Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, and its adoption in breast cancer care is particularly relevant. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations or living in underserved areas. Telemedicine can be utilized for initial consultations, follow-up appointments, and even for providing psychological support. The level of telemedicine adoption among PCPs and specialists in the 20240 area is an important indicator of healthcare accessibility and innovation. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially reach a wider patient population and provide more convenient care options.
The emotional and psychological impact of a breast cancer diagnosis is profound. Mental health resources are essential for supporting patients throughout their journey. These resources include access to therapists, support groups, and other mental health professionals who can help patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression associated with the disease. The integration of mental health services into breast cancer care is crucial for holistic patient well-being. Examining the availability of these resources, including whether PCPs and specialists routinely screen for mental health concerns and make appropriate referrals, is a critical aspect of this analysis.
The presence of specialized cancer centers in the Washington, D.C. area is a significant advantage. These centers often offer comprehensive breast cancer care, including advanced diagnostic imaging, surgical options, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. They also provide access to clinical trials and cutting-edge research. The proximity of these centers to the 20240 area is a factor that enhances the overall quality of breast cancer care. The coordination between PCPs, specialists, and cancer centers is essential to ensure seamless patient care.
The analysis must also consider the availability of support services, such as patient navigators, who can help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, and financial assistance programs, which can help patients manage the costs of treatment. The existence of these resources demonstrates a commitment to patient-centered care and can significantly improve the patient experience.
Primary care availability across Washington, D.C., is a crucial factor influencing breast cancer care. Areas with limited access to PCPs may experience delayed diagnoses and reduced access to preventative care. Therefore, the analysis must extend beyond the 20240 ZIP code and consider the broader distribution of PCPs across the city. Identifying areas with high physician-to-patient ratios and limited access to care is essential for understanding the challenges faced by patients.
The analysis should also consider the role of community health centers in providing primary care services. These centers often serve underserved populations and can play a vital role in improving access to breast cancer screening and care. The presence and capacity of these centers are a key indicator of the equity of healthcare access.
In conclusion, a comprehensive assessment of breast cancer care in the context of the 20240 ZIP code and primary care availability in Washington, D.C., requires a multi-faceted approach. It necessitates a careful evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of specialized cancer centers and support services. This analysis should highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem and identify areas for improvement.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and other relevant data, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Their platform can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, allowing you to identify areas with limited access to care and to understand the complexities of the healthcare environment in Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like