The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20317, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20317 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20317 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20317. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 179 health care providers accessible to residents in 20317, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20317, Washington, District of Columbia
| Breast Cancer Score | 89 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 39 |
| Provider Score | 100 |
| Hospital Score | 53 |
| Travel Score | 65 |
| 20317 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment are complex, demanding a multi-faceted approach that considers not only the medical expertise of physicians but also the accessibility of care and the availability of supportive services. This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP Code 20317, a location that warrants specific attention, while also examining the broader context of primary care availability in Washington. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately contributing to a better understanding of the resources available to patients.
Analyzing the physician landscape in ZIP Code 20317, a critical factor to consider is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric reveals the density of healthcare providers relative to the population, offering insights into potential wait times for appointments and the overall accessibility of care. A low ratio could indicate a shortage of physicians, potentially leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests a more readily accessible healthcare system, allowing patients to receive timely care. The specific ratio within 20317 requires further investigation.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within the zip code is crucial. These practices often demonstrate excellence in several areas, including early detection through robust screening programs, advanced treatment options, and a patient-centered approach. Their success often stems from a combination of factors, such as experienced medical professionals, state-of-the-art technology, and a commitment to continuous improvement. Researching these practices involves examining patient reviews, assessing accreditations, and evaluating their adherence to evidence-based guidelines for breast cancer care.
Telemedicine has emerged as a significant force in healthcare, particularly in areas with limited access to specialists or for patients who find travel difficult. The adoption of telemedicine within 20317 and across Washington can significantly impact breast cancer care. Telemedicine facilitates virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to specialists regardless of geographical limitations. Assessing the availability of telemedicine options, including the types of services offered and the ease of access, is essential. This includes examining the technology infrastructure of practices, the training of healthcare providers in telemedicine, and patient satisfaction with virtual care.
Breast cancer treatment is physically and emotionally challenging. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive care. Patients need access to counselors, support groups, and other mental health services to cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression that often accompany a breast cancer diagnosis. Evaluating the availability of these resources within 20317 and Washington involves assessing the number of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the integration of mental health care into the overall treatment plan.
Primary care availability in Washington is also vital. Primary care physicians often serve as the first point of contact for patients, providing preventive care, screening services, and referrals to specialists. The accessibility of primary care impacts early detection and timely diagnosis. Evaluating primary care availability requires examining the physician-to-patient ratio, the geographic distribution of primary care practices, and the availability of appointments. The integration of primary care with specialized breast cancer care is also important.
Specific practices in 20317 should be examined for their commitment to these factors. Does a particular practice in the area have a dedicated breast cancer center with a multidisciplinary team? Are they participating in clinical trials? Do they offer patient navigation services to help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system? These are important questions to consider.
The analysis should also consider the demographics of the population served by the healthcare providers in 20317. Are there disparities in access to care based on race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status? Addressing these disparities is crucial to ensuring equitable access to breast cancer care for all residents. This involves examining the cultural competency of healthcare providers, the availability of language services, and the affordability of care.
Data from various sources should be integrated to paint a complete picture. This includes data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and state and local health departments. Patient reviews, surveys, and feedback can provide valuable insights into patient experiences.
To improve breast cancer care in 20317 and Washington, there are several areas for improvement. Increasing the physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for specialists, is essential. Expanding telemedicine services can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or with mobility issues. Integrating mental health services into the treatment plan can improve patient outcomes. Addressing disparities in access to care can ensure that all residents receive the care they need.
The future of breast cancer care in 20317 and Washington hinges on the ability of healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations to work together to address these challenges and create a more patient-centered, accessible, and equitable healthcare system. This requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation, as well as a commitment to continuous improvement.
For a visual representation of this data, including the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, patient demographics, and other relevant factors, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help visualize the complexities of breast cancer care and identify areas of need. They offer a powerful tool for understanding the healthcare landscape and making informed decisions about resource allocation and service delivery.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
