The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20319 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20319 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20319. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 182 health care providers accessible to residents in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia
| Breast Cancer Score | 57 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 1 |
| Provider Score | 100 |
| Hospital Score | 47 |
| Travel Score | 54 |
| 20319 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20319 & Primary Care in Washington
This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive "Breast Cancer Score" assessment for physicians practicing within ZIP code 20319, alongside an evaluation of primary care availability across Washington State. This score considers factors crucial for breast cancer prevention, early detection, and overall patient well-being, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The goal is to offer a data-driven perspective for patients seeking quality care and to identify areas for improvement within the healthcare landscape.
ZIP code 20319, encompassing a specific geographical area, likely hosts a diverse population and a range of healthcare providers. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests better access. We will need data on the number of primary care physicians, oncologists, radiologists, and other specialists involved in breast cancer care within this ZIP code, alongside the population size, to accurately calculate this ratio. This data, ideally, would be compared against state and national averages to gauge relative access to care.
Beyond simple ratios, identifying standout practices is critical. This involves evaluating practices based on several key metrics. Firstly, the presence of comprehensive breast cancer screening programs, including mammography, ultrasound, and potentially MRI, is crucial. Secondly, the availability of genetic counseling and testing for patients at higher risk is a significant indicator of proactive care. Thirdly, the practice's commitment to patient education and support groups, which empower patients with knowledge and coping mechanisms, is essential. Finally, the utilization of evidence-based treatment protocols and adherence to national guidelines, such as those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), are important.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to specialists via telehealth can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility issues. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, allowing for virtual follow-up appointments, remote symptom management, and access to educational resources online, should receive higher scores. This is especially relevant in the context of breast cancer care, where frequent check-ups and consultations are often required.
Mental health resources are frequently overlooked but are essential for breast cancer patients. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. Practices that offer or connect patients with mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, demonstrate a commitment to holistic care. The availability of these resources, whether in-house or through referrals, is a crucial component of the Breast Cancer Score.
Moving beyond ZIP code 20319, the analysis must consider primary care availability across Washington State. Primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for patients and play a vital role in breast cancer screening and early detection. The geographic distribution of primary care physicians, especially in underserved areas, is a key indicator of access to care. Data on the number of primary care physicians per capita in different regions of Washington, along with the availability of insurance coverage and the presence of community health centers, will be essential for this assessment.
Evaluating the quality of primary care practices across the state involves looking at their screening rates for breast cancer. Practices that consistently recommend and facilitate mammograms and other screening methods according to national guidelines deserve higher scores. Furthermore, the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) and the use of patient portals can improve communication and coordination of care, leading to better outcomes.
The Breast Cancer Score would ideally incorporate data from various sources. Public health data, insurance claims data, and patient surveys would be valuable. Analyzing the data requires a robust methodology to ensure accuracy and reliability. The score should be transparent, with clear criteria and weighting for each factor. This transparency allows patients to understand how the score is derived and to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
The final score for physicians in ZIP code 20319 and for primary care availability in Washington State would be presented in a clear and accessible format. This might involve a numerical score, a letter grade, or a combination of both. The analysis should highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each practice and region, providing actionable insights for patients and healthcare providers. This information is useful for understanding the state of breast cancer care.
The analysis should also identify areas for improvement. These might include increasing the physician-to-patient ratio in underserved areas, promoting telemedicine adoption, expanding access to mental health resources, and improving screening rates. The goal is not just to provide a score but also to drive positive change within the healthcare system.
The evaluation of primary care availability across Washington State should consider the unique challenges faced by rural communities. These communities often have fewer healthcare providers, longer travel distances, and limited access to specialized care. Strategies to address these challenges might include incentivizing physicians to practice in rural areas, expanding telehealth services, and supporting community health initiatives.
The analysis should also consider the impact of social determinants of health on breast cancer outcomes. Factors such as income, education, access to healthy food, and housing can significantly affect a patient's risk of developing breast cancer and their ability to access and adhere to treatment. The Breast Cancer Score should acknowledge these factors and provide recommendations for addressing health disparities.
The success of this Breast Cancer Score analysis hinges on the availability of comprehensive and reliable data. Access to data from various sources, including healthcare providers, insurance companies, and public health agencies, is essential. Collaboration among stakeholders, including healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers, is crucial for developing and implementing effective strategies to improve breast cancer care.
The analysis should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This will ensure that the Breast Cancer Score remains relevant and provides the most up-to-date information for patients. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatments, and guidelines emerging. Regular updates are necessary to keep the analysis current.
The ultimate goal of this Breast Cancer Score analysis is to empower patients with the information they need to make informed decisions about their healthcare. By providing a data-driven assessment of physicians and primary care availability, this analysis can help patients find the best possible care and improve their chances of surviving and thriving after a breast cancer diagnosis.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, physician-to-patient ratios, and other relevant data points within ZIP code 20319 and across Washington State, we strongly recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping and data visualization tools that can help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
