30067, Marietta, Georgia Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 30067, Marietta, Georgia is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.02 percent of the residents in 30067 has some form of health insurance. 22.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.59 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30067 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 10,851 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 32 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30067. An estimate of 16 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,362 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 68,635 health care providers accessible to residents in 30067, Marietta, Georgia.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Marietta, GA (ZIP Code 30067)

This analysis provides a comprehensive "Breast Cancer Score" assessment for physicians within ZIP code 30067 (Marietta, GA), focusing on factors crucial to patient care, including access to primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape for individuals seeking breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment in this specific geographic area. The data is interpreted with the understanding that healthcare is constantly evolving, and this analysis reflects information available at the time of assessment.

The foundation of good breast cancer care rests on accessible primary care. In Marietta (30067), the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) significantly impacts a patient's ability to obtain timely referrals for mammograms, specialist consultations, and overall health management. Assessing primary care availability involves evaluating the number of PCPs per capita, the average wait times for appointments, and the acceptance of various insurance plans. Areas with a higher concentration of PCPs and shorter wait times generally receive a higher score in this category. Conversely, regions with limited access to primary care may face delays in diagnosis and treatment, impacting patient outcomes.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. A higher ratio, meaning fewer patients per physician, typically translates to greater availability of appointments, more personalized care, and potentially reduced wait times for diagnostic procedures. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio within 30067 requires examining the number of PCPs, radiologists, oncologists, and surgeons specializing in breast health relative to the population size. This data helps determine whether the area is adequately staffed to meet the healthcare needs of its residents, particularly those at risk for or diagnosed with breast cancer.

Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is vital. This involves researching practices known for their expertise in breast cancer care, including those with board-certified specialists, advanced imaging technologies, and comprehensive support services. Evaluating the quality of care requires examining patient reviews, accreditation status (e.g., accreditation by the American College of Radiology for imaging centers), and participation in clinical trials. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, offer a range of treatment options, and actively participate in research often receive higher scores.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially for follow-up appointments, consultations, and remote monitoring. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience, reduce travel time, and potentially enhance access to care for individuals with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. Evaluating telemedicine adoption involves assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring tools, and secure patient portals. Practices offering these services are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care, particularly for patients managing chronic conditions or undergoing treatment.

The integration of mental health resources into breast cancer care is crucial. A breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Evaluating the availability of mental health support involves assessing the presence of on-site therapists, referrals to mental health professionals, and access to support groups. Practices that prioritize mental health services and integrate them into their overall care plans demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient well-being and often receive higher scores.

In the context of Marietta (30067), the analysis would delve into specific practices. For example, the assessment would identify practices with a strong reputation for breast cancer screening and treatment, examining their equipment, the training of their staff, and their participation in clinical trials. It would also assess the availability of telemedicine options, such as virtual consultations for follow-up appointments or remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. Furthermore, the analysis would evaluate the presence of mental health resources, such as on-site therapists or referrals to support groups, to determine the level of holistic care offered to patients.

The final "Breast Cancer Score" would be a composite of these factors, weighted based on their relative importance to patient outcomes. A higher score would indicate a healthcare environment that is more accessible, comprehensive, and patient-centered. This scoring system would offer a valuable tool for individuals seeking breast cancer care in Marietta (30067), helping them make informed decisions about their healthcare providers. The score would not be a static number, but rather a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape.

The analysis would also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on healthcare access. Disparities in access to care, such as those related to income, insurance coverage, and transportation, would be taken into account. The goal is to provide a fair and comprehensive assessment that reflects the realities of healthcare in the community. The analysis would also consider the impact of any recent changes in healthcare policy or regulations that may affect access to care or the quality of services.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Marietta (30067) and visualize the data discussed, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful visual representation of the information discussed, allowing you to explore the healthcare environment in detail.