The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 31648, Statenville, Georgia is 4 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.48 percent of the residents in 31648 has some form of health insurance. 50.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31648 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 240 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31648. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 141 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,197 health care providers accessible to residents in 31648, Statenville, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31648, Statenville, Georgia
Breast Cancer Score | 3 |
---|---|
People Score | 23 |
Provider Score | 4 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 21 |
31648 | Statenville | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Statenville, GA (ZIP Code 31648)
Statenville, Georgia, a small community nestled in the southern part of the state, presents a unique landscape for healthcare access, particularly concerning breast cancer care. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer-related services for residents of ZIP code 31648, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive “Breast Cancer Score” assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses in the local healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests on accessible and quality primary care. PCPs play a crucial role in early detection through routine screenings, patient education, and referrals to specialists. In Statenville, the availability of PCPs is a critical factor. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio within the ZIP code requires detailed data, ideally from sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board and the US Census Bureau. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of PCPs, would significantly impact the Breast Cancer Score negatively. This scarcity could lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Conversely, a higher ratio, signifying a greater availability of PCPs, would contribute positively to the score.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This involves assessing the practices’ commitment to preventative care, including adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines from organizations like the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Practices should be actively promoting mammograms, clinical breast exams, and educating patients about risk factors and self-exams. The Breast Cancer Score would consider the implementation of these practices, giving higher marks to those actively engaging in preventative measures.
Identifying “standout practices” within the ZIP code is crucial. This involves looking for clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate exceptional commitment to breast cancer care. This could include practices that have invested in state-of-the-art mammography equipment, offer same-day appointments for suspicious findings, or have established strong referral networks with oncologists and surgeons. These practices, if identified, would be highlighted as beacons of quality care, positively influencing the overall score. Furthermore, practices that offer patient navigation services, helping patients navigate the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, would be highly valued.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical aspect of the Breast Cancer Score. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, making healthcare more accessible, especially in rural areas like Statenville. Practices that offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, or even initial screenings can significantly improve patient access. Telemedicine can also facilitate remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment, allowing for timely interventions and improved outcomes. The degree of telemedicine integration within the local healthcare system would be carefully evaluated, with higher scores awarded to practices that embrace this technology.
Mental health support is an often-overlooked, yet essential, component of breast cancer care. A diagnosis of breast cancer can have a profound impact on a patient’s emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The Breast Cancer Score must consider the availability of mental health resources within the community. This includes assessing whether PCPs screen for mental health issues, whether there are readily accessible therapists or counselors specializing in cancer care, and if support groups are available. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either directly or through referrals, would receive significant positive weighting.
The analysis will also consider factors like insurance acceptance, language accessibility, and patient reviews. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, would ensure that care is accessible to a broader population. The availability of multilingual staff or translation services would be crucial for serving a diverse community. Patient reviews, gleaned from online platforms and patient surveys, provide valuable insights into the patient experience and can highlight areas of strength and weakness within individual practices.
The final Breast Cancer Score for Statenville (ZIP code 31648) will be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of all these factors. The score will be presented in a clear and concise manner, using a grading system (e.g., A-F) to provide an easily understandable assessment of the local healthcare landscape. The score will serve as a valuable tool for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers, highlighting areas for improvement and promoting the delivery of high-quality breast cancer care within the community. The overall goal is to provide a snapshot of the breast cancer care ecosystem and to highlight areas that may require additional resources or attention.
This assessment requires data collection from various sources, including physician directories, healthcare provider websites, insurance providers, and patient feedback platforms. The analysis will strive to be as comprehensive and accurate as possible, providing a reliable evaluation of breast cancer care accessibility and quality in Statenville. The final report will be a valuable resource for the community, empowering residents to make informed decisions about their healthcare and advocating for improvements in the local healthcare system.
For a more in-depth understanding of the healthcare landscape in Statenville and the surrounding areas, including geographic variations in access to care and demographic data, we encourage you to explore the power of visual data analysis with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a dynamic and interactive platform for visualizing healthcare data, allowing you to identify trends, patterns, and disparities in access to care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like