41255, Sitka, Kentucky Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 41255, Sitka, Kentucky is 67 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.27 percent of the residents in 41255 has some form of health insurance. 44.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.70 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41255 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 152 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41255. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 60 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 693 health care providers accessible to residents in 41255, Sitka, Kentucky.

This analysis provides a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" for physicians in ZIP code 41255, Kentucky, and assesses primary care availability in Sitka, Alaska, focusing on factors relevant to breast cancer detection and care. The score is a composite metric, incorporating elements like physician density, access to specialized care, telemedicine integration, and mental health support. It's crucial to understand that this is a hypothetical exercise and doesn't reflect real-world data without a comprehensive data set.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 41255, Kentucky**

The ZIP code 41255, encompassing the town of Paintsville and surrounding areas in eastern Kentucky, presents a unique healthcare landscape. The Breast Cancer Score for this area is likely impacted by several key factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, a crucial indicator of access, are likely lower than national averages, particularly for specialists like oncologists and radiologists. This is a common challenge in rural areas. The score would reflect this scarcity, potentially lowering the overall ranking.

Standout practices, if any, would be those demonstrating innovative approaches to overcome these geographical limitations. This could include practices actively involved in community outreach programs, providing breast cancer awareness campaigns, and organizing mobile mammography clinics. Such initiatives would significantly boost their individual scores and contribute positively to the overall ZIP code assessment. These practices would likely score higher on the Breast Cancer Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. The ability to consult with specialists remotely can bridge the gap created by limited local resources. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations for initial screenings, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring, would receive a higher score. The availability of telehealth services for mental health support, which is vital for patients undergoing cancer treatment, would also be a significant positive.

Mental health resources are an integral component of breast cancer care. The Breast Cancer Score would evaluate the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists and therapists, specializing in oncology. The presence of support groups, counseling services, and access to psychiatric care would be positively weighted. The score would also consider the integration of mental health services within the primary care setting.

Furthermore, the Breast Cancer Score would assess the availability of diagnostic imaging facilities, specifically mammography machines and ultrasound equipment. The proximity of these facilities and their accessibility, considering factors like insurance acceptance and wait times, would influence the score. The presence of a dedicated breast cancer center or a comprehensive cancer care program would significantly elevate the score.

**Primary Care Availability Analysis: Sitka, Alaska**

Sitka, Alaska, a geographically isolated community, faces different challenges in healthcare access compared to a rural Kentucky town. The Breast Cancer Score for Sitka would reflect the unique circumstances of its primary care landscape. The availability of primary care physicians is critical, as they often serve as the first point of contact for patients and play a crucial role in early detection and referrals.

Physician-to-patient ratios in Sitka are likely impacted by the challenges of recruiting and retaining medical professionals in a remote location. The score would account for this, potentially lowering the overall ranking. However, the presence of a strong hospital system and its ability to attract and retain qualified physicians would be a positive factor.

The score would evaluate the availability of primary care practices offering comprehensive services, including breast cancer screenings and referrals to specialists. The integration of these services within the primary care setting is crucial for improving access and timely diagnosis. Practices that prioritize preventative care and early detection would receive a higher score.

Telemedicine plays a particularly important role in Sitka, given its geographical isolation. The Breast Cancer Score would heavily weight the adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices. The ability to consult with specialists in Anchorage or Seattle, for example, via video conferencing, can significantly improve patient outcomes. The score would also consider the availability of remote monitoring and telehealth services for mental health support.

Mental health resources are equally important in Sitka. The Breast Cancer Score would assess the availability of mental health professionals and support services, particularly those specializing in oncology. The presence of support groups, counseling services, and access to psychiatric care would be positively weighted. The score would also consider the integration of mental health services within the primary care setting.

The score would evaluate the availability of diagnostic imaging facilities, such as mammography machines and ultrasound equipment. The proximity of these facilities and their accessibility, considering factors like insurance acceptance and wait times, would influence the score. The presence of a dedicated breast cancer center or a comprehensive cancer care program would significantly elevate the score. The score would also consider the availability of transportation assistance for patients needing to travel for specialized care.

**Conclusion**

Both 41255 and Sitka face unique challenges in providing optimal breast cancer care. The Breast Cancer Score is a hypothetical tool to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare infrastructure in these areas. By analyzing factors like physician density, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can identify areas for improvement and promote better patient outcomes.

To visualize and analyze healthcare data, including physician locations, facility locations, and population demographics, consider exploring the power of spatial analysis. CartoChrome maps provide a platform for visualizing and analyzing complex datasets, helping you understand the distribution of resources and identify areas with unmet needs. Visualize your data and gain insights.