41817, Garner, Kentucky Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 41817, Garner, Kentucky is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 99.52 percent of the residents in 41817 has some form of health insurance. 76.09 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 30.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41817 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 173 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41817. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 115 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 393 health care providers accessible to residents in 41817, Garner, Kentucky.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 41817 and Primary Care in Garner

This analysis provides a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" for healthcare access and quality within ZIP code 41817, focusing on physician availability, practice characteristics, and related resources. Simultaneously, it examines primary care availability in Garner, offering a comparative perspective. This is not a real-world assessment, but a demonstration of how such an analysis could be structured.

The Breast Cancer Score, for the purpose of this analysis, would be a composite metric considering several factors relevant to timely diagnosis and treatment. These include the density of primary care physicians (PCPs), the availability of specialists (oncologists, radiologists, surgeons), the presence of advanced diagnostic technologies, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health services, and the overall patient-to-physician ratio. Each factor would be weighted based on its perceived impact on breast cancer outcomes.

**ZIP Code 41817: A Deep Dive**

Analyzing the physician landscape in 41817 begins with assessing the PCP-to-population ratio. A low ratio can indicate potential difficulties in securing timely appointments for routine checkups, including breast cancer screenings. The score would reflect this, penalizing areas with limited primary care access. Further, the analysis would identify the presence of internal medicine, family practice, and women's health specialists, as these are the primary points of contact for patients.

The presence of oncologists, radiologists, and breast surgeons within the ZIP code or in easily accessible neighboring areas is crucial. A higher concentration of these specialists would positively impact the score, as it reduces the time and travel burden for patients needing diagnosis and treatment. The analysis would investigate the proximity of these specialists, considering travel times and transportation options.

Standout practices would be identified based on several criteria. Practices with advanced diagnostic equipment, such as 3D mammography (tomosynthesis), would receive higher scores. The analysis would evaluate the availability of on-site biopsy services, which can streamline the diagnostic process. Practices with a dedicated breast cancer navigator or patient support services would also be highlighted. These resources help guide patients through the complexities of diagnosis and treatment.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Practices offering virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments or initial consultations, would be viewed favorably. This can improve access for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. The analysis would investigate the types of telemedicine services offered and the ease of access for patients.

Mental health support is increasingly recognized as an integral part of cancer care. The analysis would assess the availability of mental health professionals within the practices or through referral networks. Practices offering counseling services, support groups, or partnerships with mental health organizations would receive higher scores. Addressing the emotional and psychological needs of patients is crucial for their overall well-being and treatment adherence.

**Primary Care Availability in Garner: A Comparative View**

The analysis would then shift to primary care availability in Garner, providing a comparative perspective. Garner, as a neighboring or similar community, allows for a comparison of resource availability. The same factors – PCP-to-population ratio, specialist access, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – would be evaluated in Garner.

Comparing the scores for 41817 and Garner would reveal potential disparities in access to care. This comparison would highlight areas where 41817 might excel or lag behind. This comparative analysis is crucial for identifying areas that require improvement.

The analysis would investigate the presence of community health centers or federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in both areas. These centers often serve underserved populations and may offer a wider range of services, including financial assistance and language support. Their presence would positively impact the scores.

**Detailed Examination of Specific Practices (Hypothetical)**

For 41817, the analysis might identify a hypothetical practice, "Riverview Health," as a standout. Riverview Health, for example, might have a high PCP-to-patient ratio, a dedicated breast cancer navigator, and on-site 3D mammography. They might also actively utilize telemedicine for follow-up appointments and offer counseling services through a partnership with a local mental health organization. This would significantly boost their score.

Conversely, another hypothetical practice, "Hillside Clinic," might have a lower PCP-to-patient ratio, limited access to specialists, and no telemedicine offerings. This would result in a lower score, highlighting areas for improvement.

The analysis would also consider the demographics of the population served by each practice. Practices serving a higher proportion of vulnerable populations (e.g., low-income, elderly, or those with limited English proficiency) would be assessed for their ability to address the unique needs of these patients. This includes factors such as language accessibility, culturally sensitive care, and financial assistance programs.

**Data Sources and Limitations**

This analysis would rely on publicly available data sources, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), state medical board databases, and health insurance provider directories. The accuracy of the analysis depends on the completeness and accuracy of these data sources. The analysis also would be limited by the availability of data on specific practice characteristics, such as the adoption of telemedicine or the availability of mental health services.

**Conclusion**

This hypothetical Breast Cancer Score analysis provides a framework for assessing the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care within a specific geographic area. By evaluating physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, this type of analysis can identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. This information can be valuable for patients seeking care, healthcare providers striving to improve their services, and policymakers working to address healthcare disparities.

For a comprehensive visualization of healthcare resources and geographic analysis of physician availability, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Utilize their advanced mapping capabilities to gain deeper insights into healthcare landscapes and make informed decisions about healthcare access.