The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 42366, Philpot, Kentucky is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.27 percent of the residents in 42366 has some form of health insurance. 28.82 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.38 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42366 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,367 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42366. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 777 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 721 health care providers accessible to residents in 42366, Philpot, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 42366, Philpot, Kentucky
Breast Cancer Score | 67 |
---|---|
People Score | 76 |
Provider Score | 63 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 44 |
42366 | Philpot | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Breast cancer care access and quality are crucial health indicators, particularly within a specific geographic area. This analysis assesses the landscape of breast cancer support in Philpot, Kentucky (ZIP code 42366), focusing on physician availability, practice strengths, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources. The aim is to provide a comprehensive picture for residents and healthcare stakeholders.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric. In Philpot and the surrounding area, data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services indicates a potential shortage of primary care physicians. While precise figures for breast cancer specialists are harder to obtain at this hyper-local level, the limited primary care base suggests potential challenges in early detection and referral pathways. This is a critical factor, as timely access to primary care is often the gateway to screenings and early detection, which significantly improves treatment outcomes. The ratio necessitates a deeper dive, perhaps through a local health department assessment, to fully understand the implications for breast cancer care.
Analyzing standout practices requires identifying those with a demonstrable commitment to breast cancer care. This involves examining the services offered, patient outcomes, and community outreach efforts. Practices that actively participate in breast cancer awareness campaigns, offer comprehensive screening programs (mammograms, ultrasounds, and potentially MRI), and have established relationships with oncologists and surgeons are crucial. Furthermore, practices that have a dedicated breast cancer navigator or patient advocate, providing support and guidance throughout the patient journey, are highly valuable.
Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges. In a rural area like Philpot, telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists without extensive travel. This is particularly important for follow-up appointments, discussing test results, and receiving mental health support. However, the success of telemedicine hinges on several factors, including reliable internet access, patient comfort with technology, and the availability of telehealth-enabled equipment in local clinics. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their breast cancer care model, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and patient education, deserve recognition.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but essential component of breast cancer care. A diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that prioritize mental health by offering on-site counseling, referrals to therapists, or support groups are essential. Collaboration with local mental health providers and organizations is a key indicator of a practice's commitment to holistic patient care. Assessing the availability and accessibility of these resources is a vital aspect of evaluating the overall quality of breast cancer support in the area.
The assessment of breast cancer support in Philpot (42366) reveals a complex picture. The potential primary care physician shortage highlights a need for proactive strategies to improve access to care. Identifying and supporting practices that prioritize comprehensive screening, telemedicine integration, and mental health services is crucial.
The analysis requires a multi-faceted approach. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Kentucky Department for Public Health, and local healthcare providers are essential. The Kentucky Cancer Consortium, for example, may offer valuable insights into cancer prevalence and resources within the state. Publicly available information, such as practice websites and patient reviews, provides further context.
The evaluation should also consider patient perspectives. Conducting surveys or focus groups with breast cancer survivors in the area can provide valuable insights into their experiences, challenges, and needs. This patient-centered approach is crucial for understanding the true impact of the healthcare landscape.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socio-economic factors that can influence access to care. Poverty, lack of transportation, and insurance coverage can all be barriers to timely screening and treatment. Identifying and addressing these disparities is essential for ensuring equitable access to breast cancer support.
The final assessment should include specific recommendations for improving breast cancer care in Philpot. This might include strategies to increase the number of primary care physicians, promote telemedicine adoption, expand mental health services, and address socio-economic barriers. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government is essential for implementing these recommendations.
The assessment of breast cancer support in Philpot (42366) should be a living document, updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. As new practices open, telemedicine technologies evolve, and mental health resources become available, the analysis should be revised to ensure its accuracy and relevance.
Finally, the analysis should be disseminated widely to residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers. This can be achieved through various channels, including local newspapers, community meetings, and online platforms. The goal is to raise awareness about the importance of breast cancer care and to empower individuals to make informed decisions about their health.
For a dynamic, visual representation of this data and the surrounding healthcare landscape, consider exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping tools that can help visualize physician locations, healthcare resource availability, and other relevant data points. This can enhance the understanding of access to care and inform strategic planning. Visit CartoChrome today to see how they can help you map your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like