The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 42410, Earlington, Kentucky is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.38 percent of the residents in 42410 has some form of health insurance. 52.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42410 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 252 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42410. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 129 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,259 health care providers accessible to residents in 42410, Earlington, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 42410, Earlington, Kentucky
Breast Cancer Score | 36 |
---|---|
People Score | 46 |
Provider Score | 58 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 27 |
42410 | Earlington | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Breast cancer care access and quality are critical health indicators, especially when examined at a localized level. This analysis focuses on evaluating the availability and quality of breast cancer-related healthcare services for residents of ZIP Code 42410 (Earlington, Kentucky) and assessing the overall primary care landscape within the same area. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.
Physician-to-patient ratios are fundamental to understanding healthcare accessibility. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative screenings, and potential delays in diagnosis and treatment. Data from the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, combined with population estimates from the US Census Bureau, would be essential to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 42410. This ratio should be specifically calculated for primary care physicians, oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons specializing in breast cancer. A higher ratio of these specialists would indicate better access to the specialized care needed for breast cancer detection and treatment.
Primary care availability is the cornerstone of preventative healthcare. Regular check-ups, screenings, and early detection are crucial in combating breast cancer. The analysis would need to evaluate the number of primary care practices operating within Earlington, their hours of operation, and their capacity to accept new patients. Assessing the availability of same-day or next-day appointments, the presence of extended evening or weekend hours, and the acceptance of various insurance plans are also crucial factors. The presence of patient navigators or dedicated staff assisting with cancer screening referrals and follow-up care would be considered a significant asset.
Standout practices within the area would be those demonstrating exceptional performance in breast cancer care. Identifying these practices would require a review of publicly available data, patient reviews, and potentially, interviews with healthcare professionals. Key indicators would include: the utilization of evidence-based screening guidelines, the adoption of advanced imaging technologies like 3D mammography (tomosynthesis), the availability of genetic counseling and testing for high-risk patients, and the implementation of multidisciplinary care models that involve primary care physicians, radiologists, oncologists, surgeons, and other specialists. Practices with a strong focus on patient education, support groups, and survivorship programs would also be highly regarded.
Telemedicine adoption has revolutionized healthcare delivery, particularly in rural areas. The availability of telehealth services for breast cancer consultations, follow-up appointments, and educational sessions could significantly improve access to care for residents of Earlington. The analysis would assess which primary care practices and specialists offer telehealth options, the types of services available via telehealth (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the ease of use for patients. The integration of telehealth into the overall care continuum, including the ability to access medical records and communicate with healthcare providers electronically, would be a key consideration.
Mental health resources are a critical component of comprehensive breast cancer care. A diagnosis of breast cancer can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. The analysis would assess the availability of mental health services within Earlington, including access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists. The presence of support groups specifically for breast cancer patients and survivors would be a significant advantage. The integration of mental health services into the broader healthcare system, such as the availability of on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, would be considered a positive factor.
The overall ‘Breast Cancer Score’ for doctors in ZIP Code 42410 and primary care availability in Earlington would be a composite score, reflecting the weighted average of the factors discussed above. The weight assigned to each factor would be determined based on its relative importance in delivering high-quality breast cancer care. For example, physician-to-patient ratios and primary care availability might be given a higher weight than telemedicine adoption, while telemedicine adoption would be given a higher weight than the availability of mental health resources. The final score would provide a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare environment, highlighting areas of strength and weakness.
The analysis would also identify potential barriers to care, such as transportation challenges, insurance coverage limitations, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding these barriers is crucial for developing targeted interventions to improve access to care for all residents of Earlington. The analysis would consider the availability of transportation assistance programs, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of financial assistance programs for patients.
The analysis would need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as the addition of new healthcare providers, the adoption of new technologies, and changes in insurance coverage. This ongoing monitoring would ensure that the ‘Breast Cancer Score’ remains a relevant and useful tool for assessing the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care in Earlington.
The information gathered and analyzed here can be used to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members about the state of breast cancer care in Earlington. It can also be used to identify areas where improvements are needed and to develop strategies to address those needs. For example, the analysis might highlight the need for additional primary care physicians, the expansion of telemedicine services, or the establishment of a breast cancer support group.
The analysis would also consider the impact of healthcare disparities on breast cancer outcomes. It would assess whether certain populations, such as racial and ethnic minorities, experience unequal access to care or worse outcomes. The analysis would identify any disparities and recommend strategies to address them.
To further enhance the understanding of the healthcare landscape in Earlington and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, primary care practice locations, and other relevant data, allowing for a more in-depth analysis and a better understanding of healthcare access.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like