01922, Byfield, Massachusetts Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 01922, Byfield, Massachusetts is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.80 percent of the residents in 01922 has some form of health insurance. 32.07 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01922 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,082 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01922. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 890 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,041 health care providers accessible to residents in 01922, Byfield, Massachusetts.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in 01922 and Primary Care in Byfield

This analysis evaluates the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 01922 (Georgetown, MA) and the availability of primary care resources in the adjacent town of Byfield, focusing on factors that contribute to a comprehensive "Breast Cancer Score." This score considers access to care, quality of services, and support systems crucial for patients navigating diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. While a definitive numerical score cannot be assigned without direct access to proprietary data, this analysis provides a qualitative assessment based on publicly available information and industry trends.

The foundation of any strong breast cancer care system rests on accessible and qualified primary care physicians (PCPs). Byfield's proximity to Georgetown necessitates an examination of primary care availability in the area. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A higher ratio, meaning more patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses. Publicly available data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or local health departments can offer insights into these ratios. If the ratio is unfavorable, it suggests a potential bottleneck in accessing initial screenings and referrals, impacting the overall score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Do local PCPs actively promote breast cancer screenings, such as mammograms? Do they have established referral pathways to specialists? Are they knowledgeable about the latest screening guidelines and risk factors? These factors directly influence early detection, a critical element in successful treatment outcomes. A strong Breast Cancer Score requires a proactive and informed primary care network.

The availability of specialists within or easily accessible from 01922 is another crucial element. Oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists form the core of a breast cancer treatment team. The presence of these specialists at nearby hospitals, such as those in Newburyport or Beverly, directly impacts the score. The shorter the travel time to these specialists, the better the patient experience and the quicker the access to potentially life-saving treatments. This also includes the availability of specialized breast imaging centers with advanced technologies.

Standout practices within the 01922 area would significantly boost the score. These practices might be recognized for their patient-centered care, their commitment to research and clinical trials, or their use of innovative treatment modalities. Identifying practices with a strong reputation within the community, as evidenced by patient reviews and peer recognition, is a key component of this assessment. A practice that consistently demonstrates excellence in breast cancer care would significantly elevate the overall score.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and even some forms of therapy can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in more rural areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering flexible and convenient options, would receive a higher score. This is not just about convenience; it's about ensuring continuity of care and reducing potential barriers to treatment.

Mental health resources play a vital role in the Breast Cancer Score. A breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can be incredibly stressful, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, specializing in oncology, is crucial. Does the local healthcare system provide access to these resources? Are support groups available for patients and their families? A comprehensive approach to care must address the emotional and psychological needs of patients. This includes access to support groups, counseling services, and psychiatric care when needed.

The integration of these resources is also critical. A high-scoring system would have a seamless referral process between primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health providers. This coordinated approach ensures that patients receive the care they need in a timely and efficient manner. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate information sharing is another positive factor.

The Breast Cancer Score also considers the availability of patient education and support services. Does the local healthcare system offer educational materials about breast cancer prevention, screening, and treatment options? Are there patient navigators to help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system? These resources empower patients to make informed decisions about their care and improve their overall experience. Organizations like the American Cancer Society or local breast cancer support groups contribute positively to the score.

Furthermore, the score should reflect the commitment to addressing health disparities. Are services available to underserved populations, including those with limited financial resources or language barriers? Addressing these disparities is essential to ensuring equitable access to quality breast cancer care for all residents of the area.

In conclusion, evaluating the Breast Cancer Score for doctors in 01922 and primary care availability in Byfield requires a multifaceted approach. Assessing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources are all crucial components. The overall score reflects not just the presence of services but also the quality, accessibility, and coordination of those services.

If you are interested in visualizing this data and gaining a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in your area, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. They offer a powerful way to map and analyze healthcare resources, helping you make informed decisions about your health and the health of your community.