The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 02467, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.45 percent of the residents in 02467 has some form of health insurance. 18.71 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 90.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02467 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 5,348 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02467. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,485 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,341 health care providers accessible to residents in 02467, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 02467, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
Breast Cancer Score | 74 |
---|---|
People Score | 31 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 63 |
02467 | Chestnut Hill | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical 'Breast Cancer Score' assessment for primary care physicians in ZIP code 02467 (Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts), focusing on factors relevant to breast cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. This score is a composite, reflecting the availability and quality of services, not a definitive medical judgment. It emphasizes the importance of accessible, comprehensive care within the community.
The core of a strong 'Breast Cancer Score' lies in the accessibility of primary care. Chestnut Hill, a relatively affluent suburb, likely enjoys a favorable physician-to-patient ratio compared to underserved areas. However, simply having doctors isn't enough. The *quality* of those physicians and their practices is paramount. A high score demands a robust network of primary care providers, ideally with a proven track record of early detection and patient navigation. This includes regular mammogram screenings, clinical breast exams, and a streamlined referral process to specialists.
Standout practices in this context would demonstrate a proactive approach to breast cancer screening. This might manifest through automated reminders for mammograms, dedicated patient navigators who assist with appointments and insurance complexities, and partnerships with local imaging centers known for their advanced technology and experienced radiologists. Practices employing electronic health records (EHRs) with built-in screening protocols and data analysis capabilities would also receive a higher rating. These systems can flag patients who are overdue for screenings and track outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments, discussing test results, and providing emotional support, can significantly enhance the patient experience. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering secure video conferencing and remote monitoring capabilities, would contribute positively to the 'Breast Cancer Score'. This is especially relevant for patients who may have mobility issues or who live in areas with limited transportation options. Telemedicine also allows for easier access to specialists located further afield.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of breast cancer care. A diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services is essential. A strong 'Breast Cancer Score' would reflect the availability of these resources within the primary care network. This might involve partnerships with local therapists, psychiatrists, and support organizations specializing in cancer care. Practices that actively screen for mental health concerns and offer referrals to appropriate services would score higher.
The presence of a multidisciplinary approach is also important. Ideally, primary care practices would collaborate closely with oncologists, surgeons, radiation therapists, and other specialists to provide a coordinated and comprehensive treatment plan. This includes regular communication, shared patient records, and participation in tumor boards to discuss complex cases. Practices that demonstrate this level of collaboration would be seen as providing a higher quality of care.
Furthermore, the 'Breast Cancer Score' should consider the practice's commitment to patient education. Providing patients with clear, concise information about breast cancer risk factors, screening guidelines, and treatment options is essential. This might involve offering educational materials, hosting patient workshops, or maintaining a website with relevant resources. Practices that actively engage in patient education are more likely to empower patients to take an active role in their own healthcare.
Insurance acceptance and financial assistance programs are also important factors. The 'Breast Cancer Score' would reflect the practice's ability to accept a wide range of insurance plans and its knowledge of financial assistance programs available to patients who may be struggling to afford care. This ensures that financial barriers do not prevent patients from accessing necessary screening and treatment.
Regarding the specific ZIP code of 02467, the 'Breast Cancer Score' would need to be informed by local data. This includes the demographics of the population, the prevalence of breast cancer in the area, and the availability of healthcare resources. The score would also need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as new screening guidelines, advances in treatment, and the emergence of new technologies.
Analyzing the primary care availability in Chestnut Hill requires a granular approach. One must consider the number of primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code, the types of services they offer (e.g., internal medicine, family practice), and their affiliations with hospitals and specialty clinics. The geographical distribution of these practices within the community is also important, ensuring that patients have convenient access to care.
The analysis should also evaluate the accessibility of these practices. This includes factors such as office hours, appointment availability, and the ability to accommodate patients with disabilities. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, and online scheduling options would contribute positively to the score.
The 'Breast Cancer Score' is not a static measure. It's a dynamic assessment that should evolve with the changing healthcare landscape. It's designed to be a useful tool for patients seeking primary care in Chestnut Hill, providing them with valuable information to make informed decisions about their healthcare. The goal is to encourage a proactive approach to breast cancer prevention and early detection.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Chestnut Hill and visualize the distribution of primary care practices, imaging centers, and support services, we invite you to explore the power of spatial data. **Visit CartoChrome maps to visualize and analyze healthcare data in your area and discover the resources available to you.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like