The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 02558, Onset, Massachusetts is 64 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.25 percent of the residents in 02558 has some form of health insurance. 53.96 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02558 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 100 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02558. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 619 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,070 health care providers accessible to residents in 02558, Onset, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 02558, Onset, Massachusetts
Breast Cancer Score | 60 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 64 |
Hospital Score | 73 |
Travel Score | 34 |
02558 | Onset | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Breast cancer care, a multifaceted endeavor demanding a coordinated approach, necessitates evaluating several critical factors. This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP Code 02558, encompassing Onset, Massachusetts, focusing on physician availability, practice quality, technological integration, and mental health support. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to patients and assess the overall strength of the local healthcare system in addressing this significant health concern.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). They serve as the initial point of contact, guiding patients through screening, diagnosis, and referral processes. Assessing primary care availability involves examining physician-to-patient ratios. A higher ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, generally suggests greater accessibility and potentially shorter wait times for appointments. Conversely, a lower ratio might indicate strain on the system, potentially leading to delayed care. In Onset, the physician-to-patient ratio should be investigated using publicly available data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health or other reliable sources. This data provides a crucial baseline for evaluating the accessibility of primary care services.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care practices is paramount. This involves evaluating factors such as the use of electronic health records (EHRs), which facilitate seamless information sharing between providers; the availability of on-site diagnostic services, which can expedite the diagnostic process; and the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for breast cancer screening and management. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care are likely to provide a higher level of service. Researching specific practices in the area and examining their accreditations and patient satisfaction scores can provide valuable insights into their quality.
The availability of specialists, particularly oncologists and surgeons, is another critical element. These specialists are essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical interventions. Evaluating the presence of these specialists within a reasonable geographic radius is vital. This includes assessing the number of specialists, their board certifications, and their affiliations with hospitals or cancer centers. Proximity to comprehensive cancer centers, which offer a full spectrum of services, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and clinical trials, is a significant advantage for patients. The ability to access these specialized services locally or within a manageable distance is a key factor in the overall quality of breast cancer care.
Technological integration plays an increasingly important role in modern healthcare. Telemedicine, in particular, offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. Examining the adoption of telemedicine by local practices is crucial. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and online patient portals. Telemedicine can facilitate follow-up appointments, medication management, and access to specialist consultations, reducing the burden on patients and improving their overall experience. Practices that embrace technology are often better equipped to provide timely and convenient care.
Mental health support is an often-overlooked but essential component of breast cancer care. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. Assessing the availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is therefore crucial. This includes evaluating the presence of mental health professionals within primary care practices, the availability of referrals to specialized mental health services, and the existence of support groups specifically for breast cancer patients. Integrating mental health services into the overall care plan can significantly improve patients' quality of life and their ability to cope with the challenges of their illness.
Standout practices in the area should be identified based on their commitment to patient-centered care, their adoption of technology, and their overall quality metrics. These practices might demonstrate excellence in areas such as patient communication, care coordination, or patient satisfaction. Identifying these standout practices can provide valuable information for patients seeking high-quality breast cancer care. This requires a thorough review of practice websites, patient reviews, and publicly available data to identify practices that consistently deliver exceptional care.
The analysis should consider the overall coordination of care. This involves evaluating the communication and collaboration between primary care physicians, specialists, and other healthcare providers. A well-coordinated care system ensures that patients receive seamless and comprehensive care, with all providers working together to achieve the best possible outcomes. This includes assessing the use of care management programs, the availability of care coordinators, and the integration of electronic health records to facilitate information sharing.
In conclusion, evaluating breast cancer care in ZIP Code 02558 requires a comprehensive assessment of primary care availability, specialist access, technological integration, mental health support, and overall care coordination. The physician-to-patient ratio provides a foundational understanding of accessibility, while the quality of practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources significantly impact the patient experience. Identifying standout practices and assessing the level of care coordination further enhances the understanding of the local healthcare landscape.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare resources available in your area, including the locations of physicians, specialists, and hospitals, and their relationships to each other, consider using CartoChrome maps. Their interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the geographical distribution of healthcare services and help you make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like