The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 02642, Eastham, Massachusetts is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.38 percent of the residents in 02642 has some form of health insurance. 53.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.79 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02642 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 828 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02642. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,202 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 439 health care providers accessible to residents in 02642, Eastham, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 02642, Eastham, Massachusetts
Breast Cancer Score | 36 |
---|---|
People Score | 48 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 64 |
Travel Score | 13 |
02642 | Eastham | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" assessment for primary care physicians within ZIP code 02642 (Eastham, Massachusetts), focusing on factors relevant to breast cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. This score is a composite, imaginary metric and does not reflect any actual, validated scoring system. The goal is to illustrate how various elements contribute to a comprehensive evaluation of care accessibility and quality in the context of breast cancer.
The foundation of a strong "Breast Cancer Score" begins with the availability and accessibility of primary care. Eastham, a relatively small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in this regard. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can strain resources and potentially limit appointment availability for preventative screenings and timely follow-up care. In this hypothetical scenario, we assume a moderate physician-to-patient ratio within 02642, but further investigation would be necessary to ascertain the actual figures. The presence of multiple primary care practices within the zip code improves the score, offering patients more choices and potentially shorter wait times.
Standout practices within this context are those that demonstrate a proactive approach to breast cancer care. This includes actively promoting regular mammograms, providing patient education materials, and having established referral pathways to specialists, such as oncologists and surgeons. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively can also significantly improve their score. EHRs allow for efficient tracking of patient screening history, reminders for follow-up appointments, and streamlined communication with specialists. Practices that participate in regional or national quality improvement initiatives related to cancer screening and care would also receive a higher score.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. Telemedicine offers the potential to increase access to care, especially for patients who may have difficulty traveling to appointments due to distance, mobility issues, or transportation limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations for routine check-ups, follow-up appointments, or even initial consultations for breast cancer concerns would receive a boost in their score. The ability to conduct virtual consultations can also improve patient convenience and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. The quality of the telemedicine platform, including its ease of use and security features, is also a consideration.
Mental health resources play a vital role in the overall well-being of breast cancer patients. A diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care model significantly improve their "Breast Cancer Score." This could include on-site counselors, partnerships with mental health professionals in the community, or referrals to support groups. The availability of resources for managing stress, coping with treatment side effects, and addressing emotional needs is essential.
The integration of these elements into a cohesive care model is key. The best-performing practices would be those that prioritize patient education, provide comprehensive screening services, facilitate seamless referrals to specialists, and offer robust support for mental and emotional well-being. The "Breast Cancer Score" would reflect the degree to which a practice has successfully integrated these elements.
The availability of diagnostic imaging services within the zip code is also a critical factor. Access to mammography and other imaging modalities, such as ultrasound and MRI, is essential for early detection. Practices that have established relationships with local imaging centers or that offer on-site imaging services would receive a higher score. The quality of the imaging equipment and the expertise of the radiologists are also important considerations.
Furthermore, the "Breast Cancer Score" would assess the practice's commitment to patient communication and shared decision-making. Practices that actively involve patients in their care, provide clear and understandable information about their diagnosis and treatment options, and encourage patients to ask questions would receive a higher score. The ability to communicate effectively with patients in their preferred language and to provide culturally sensitive care is also a significant factor.
The presence of patient navigators or care coordinators can also significantly improve the score. Patient navigators help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, providing support with scheduling appointments, coordinating care, and accessing resources. Care coordinators can also help patients manage their medications, understand their treatment plans, and address any concerns they may have.
Finally, the "Breast Cancer Score" would consider the practice's commitment to continuous quality improvement. Practices that regularly review their performance, track patient outcomes, and implement changes to improve their care delivery would receive a higher score. The willingness to learn from mistakes and to adapt to new evidence-based practices is essential for providing high-quality care.
This "Breast Cancer Score" analysis is a hypothetical framework. It emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach to breast cancer care, encompassing early detection, timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and robust patient support. The specific weight given to each factor would depend on the individual's priorities and values. The goal is to provide a starting point for evaluating the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care within a specific geographic area.
To gain a visual understanding of the distribution of these factors and the geographic accessibility of care within Eastham and surrounding areas, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and the availability of resources, helping to identify areas with greater or lesser access to care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like