39074, Forest, Mississippi Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 39074, Forest, Mississippi is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 84.27 percent of the residents in 39074 has some form of health insurance. 46.19 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 46.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39074 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,920 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39074. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,413 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 292 health care providers accessible to residents in 39074, Forest, Mississippi.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Forest, MS (ZIP Code 39074)

This analysis assesses the availability and quality of breast cancer-related care within ZIP code 39074 (Forest, Mississippi), focusing on primary care physician (PCP) resources and their impact on early detection and patient support. The objective is to provide a "Breast Cancer Score" framework, evaluating key factors that influence a patient's journey from initial screening to potential treatment and ongoing care. This analysis will consider physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and assess the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of Forest's healthcare landscape.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in accessible primary care. PCPs are often the first point of contact, crucial for initiating screenings, providing referrals, and offering ongoing support. In Forest, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed screenings, and reduced opportunities for preventative care. This directly impacts the Breast Cancer Score, as early detection is paramount. While precise figures fluctuate, research into the local medical community is essential to determine the current ratio. This involves analyzing the number of practicing PCPs within the 39074 ZIP code and comparing it to the population size. Public health data and local hospital information are vital sources for this data.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices is crucial. Standout practices demonstrate a commitment to proactive breast cancer screening protocols. This includes ensuring patients are up-to-date with mammogram recommendations based on age and risk factors. Practices that actively remind patients of screenings and provide educational materials contribute positively to the Breast Cancer Score. These practices might also incorporate patient navigators, individuals who guide patients through the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. The presence of these navigators, particularly within primary care settings, significantly enhances the patient experience and improves outcomes. Identifying these practices involves researching local medical directories, reviewing patient testimonials, and assessing the availability of services like on-site mammography or partnerships with local imaging centers.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to conduct virtual consultations offers several advantages, particularly in rural areas like Forest. Telemedicine can facilitate initial consultations, follow-up appointments, and discussions about test results. This increases access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or transportation challenges. Practices that embrace telemedicine, providing secure and user-friendly platforms, receive a higher Breast Cancer Score. The availability of telemedicine also allows patients to consult with specialists located outside of Forest, broadening their access to expertise. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves examining practice websites, contacting clinics to inquire about virtual appointment options, and evaluating the ease of use and security of the platforms.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for patients facing a breast cancer diagnosis. The emotional toll of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery can be significant. Practices that recognize this and offer access to mental health support, such as therapists or counselors, receive a higher Breast Cancer Score. This support can take various forms, including on-site counseling, referrals to mental health professionals, or partnerships with support groups. The presence of these resources demonstrates a holistic approach to patient care, addressing not only the physical aspects of the disease but also the psychological and emotional well-being of the patient. Evaluating mental health resources involves researching local mental health providers, assessing the availability of support groups, and examining the integration of mental health services within primary care practices.

The overall Breast Cancer Score for Forest (39074) is a composite of these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, the proactive screening protocols of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources all contribute to the score. A high score reflects a healthcare environment that prioritizes early detection, provides comprehensive support, and facilitates access to care. A low score indicates areas for improvement, such as addressing physician shortages, promoting proactive screening practices, expanding telemedicine options, and increasing access to mental health support.

To improve the Breast Cancer Score, several strategies can be implemented. Recruiting more PCPs to address the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. Supporting practices in adopting proactive screening protocols, including patient reminders and educational materials, is essential. Encouraging the adoption of telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for those in rural areas. Finally, increasing access to mental health resources through partnerships with local providers or the integration of mental health services within primary care practices is vital for supporting patients' emotional well-being.

This analysis provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of breast cancer-related care in Forest, Mississippi. By assessing these factors, healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members can work together to improve the Breast Cancer Score and ensure that all residents have access to the care they need. This will require a collaborative effort, including local hospitals, primary care practices, mental health providers, and community organizations. The goal is to create a healthcare environment that prioritizes early detection, provides comprehensive support, and empowers patients to navigate their breast cancer journey with confidence and dignity.

For a more detailed visual representation of healthcare access and resources in Forest, Mississippi, including physician locations, clinic information, and demographic data relevant to breast cancer risk factors, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. They provide a dynamic and interactive way to understand the healthcare landscape and identify areas for improvement.