39153, Raleigh, Mississippi Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 39153, Raleigh, Mississippi is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 84.45 percent of the residents in 39153 has some form of health insurance. 32.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39153 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 615 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39153. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 431 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 272 health care providers accessible to residents in 39153, Raleigh, Mississippi.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 39153 & Raleigh Primary Care

This analysis assesses the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP Code 39153 and the primary care environment in Raleigh, North Carolina, focusing on factors crucial for patient outcomes. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of access to care, quality of services, and available resources, ultimately informing individuals seeking the best possible care. The analysis is structured around key performance indicators (KPIs) relevant to breast cancer treatment and support.

**ZIP Code 39153: A Localized Perspective**

ZIP Code 39153, the geographical focus for this initial assessment, requires a localized investigation into its healthcare infrastructure. This includes a detailed examination of available medical professionals, specifically those specializing in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of healthcare providers, can lead to delayed appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially poorer outcomes. Data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with information from the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure, would be necessary to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 39153. This would include the number of primary care physicians, oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists specializing in breast health.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care offered by the existing medical practices is paramount. This involves evaluating factors such as accreditation by recognized organizations (e.g., the American College of Surgeons for breast centers), the availability of advanced diagnostic technologies (e.g., 3D mammography, MRI), and the use of evidence-based treatment protocols. Identifying standout practices within 39153 would necessitate a review of patient satisfaction surveys, peer reviews, and clinical outcomes data, if publicly available.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical area. The ability to access virtual consultations with specialists, particularly for follow-up appointments or second opinions, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services within 39153 requires examining the practices’ online presence and telehealth capabilities.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for breast cancer patients. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services within the ZIP Code is crucial. This includes evaluating the presence of licensed therapists, psychiatrists, and social workers specializing in oncology support.

**Raleigh: A Broader Primary Care Landscape**

Shifting focus to Raleigh, the analysis examines the primary care environment, which serves as the gateway to specialized breast cancer care. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a fundamental factor. A robust primary care system ensures that patients have regular access to preventative screenings, early detection, and timely referrals to specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio in Raleigh, compared to national averages, provides a crucial benchmark.

The types of primary care practices available in Raleigh are important. Do they offer comprehensive services, including mammogram referrals and breast health education? Are there specific practices that prioritize preventative care and early detection? This requires a review of practice websites, patient testimonials, and information from the North Carolina Medical Board.

The integration of technology within primary care practices is becoming increasingly important. Electronic health records (EHRs) facilitate efficient communication between PCPs and specialists, improving care coordination. Patient portals allow patients to access their medical records, schedule appointments, and communicate with their physicians, which can improve patient engagement.

The availability of mental health services within primary care practices is also a key consideration. Integrated mental health services, where mental health professionals work directly within the primary care setting, can improve access to care and reduce the stigma associated with mental health challenges.

**Comparative Analysis and Scoring Methodology**

Developing a "Breast Cancer Score" requires a standardized methodology. Each KPI discussed above would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance to patient outcomes. For example, physician-to-patient ratios might receive a higher weight than the availability of online appointment scheduling.

Data would be collected from various sources, including government databases, medical boards, healthcare directories, and practice websites. Each practice or ZIP Code would be scored on each KPI, and the scores would be aggregated to produce an overall score. This score would provide a comparative ranking of the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care.

**Challenges and Considerations**

Data availability is a significant challenge. Obtaining comprehensive and up-to-date information on all the factors discussed above can be difficult. Some data, such as patient outcomes data, may not be publicly available. Additionally, the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, so the analysis must be updated regularly to remain relevant.

**Conclusion**

This analysis provides a framework for evaluating the breast cancer care landscape in ZIP Code 39153 and the primary care environment in Raleigh. By assessing physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can gain a more complete understanding of access to care and the quality of services available to patients. The ultimate goal is to empower individuals with the information they need to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

**Call to Action**

To visualize and analyze this complex data more effectively, consider exploring the power of geospatial mapping. CartoChrome maps can transform raw data into interactive visualizations, allowing you to identify patterns, trends, and disparities in healthcare access. Explore CartoChrome maps to gain deeper insights into the breast cancer care landscape and make data-driven decisions.