The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 27047, Siloam, North Carolina is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 74.07 percent of the residents in 27047 has some form of health insurance. 31.20 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.21 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27047 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 477 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27047. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 128 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,378 health care providers accessible to residents in 27047, Siloam, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27047, Siloam, North Carolina
Breast Cancer Score | 71 |
---|---|
People Score | 80 |
Provider Score | 34 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 55 |
27047 | Siloam | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 27047 and Siloam Primary Care
Analyzing the breast cancer landscape within ZIP Code 27047, encompassing Siloam, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis assesses the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), the quality of those physicians, and the resources available for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and support. We will evaluate the physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and consider the integration of mental health resources. This comprehensive review aims to provide a "Breast Cancer Score" assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of any effective breast cancer care pathway is accessible and competent primary care. Siloam's primary care landscape is the initial point of contact for patients. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A lower ratio, meaning fewer patients per doctor, generally translates to more available appointment slots and potentially more individualized care. Data from the North Carolina Medical Board, combined with publicly available census information for the 27047 ZIP code, allows for an initial estimation of this ratio. This ratio is not static; it fluctuates based on physician availability, patient influx, and the retirement of existing providers. A detailed analysis would involve surveying local practices to determine their patient load and appointment scheduling practices.
Standout practices within the Siloam area are identified through patient reviews, peer recognition, and the scope of services offered. Practices that offer comprehensive care, including preventative screenings, diagnostic imaging referrals, and patient education, are highly valued. The presence of on-site mammography services, or close partnerships with imaging centers, significantly enhances the patient experience and streamlines the diagnostic process. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs, promoting breast cancer awareness and early detection, also contribute positively to the overall score. Patient testimonials, when available, provide valuable insights into the quality of care, the responsiveness of staff, and the overall patient experience.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical factor, particularly in a rural setting like Siloam. Telemedicine enables patients to access care remotely, reducing the need for travel, especially beneficial for follow-up appointments, medication management, and consultations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring, receive a higher score. The availability of telehealth services for breast cancer-related concerns, such as genetic counseling or post-treatment support, further enhances the score. The ease of use of the telemedicine platform, the availability of technical support, and the integration of telemedicine with existing patient portals are all important considerations.
Mental health resources are an integral component of comprehensive breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site therapists or partnerships with mental health providers, receive a higher score. The availability of support groups, counseling services, and access to psychiatric care is crucial. Practices that proactively screen patients for mental health concerns and offer referrals to appropriate resources demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The presence of resources specifically tailored to the unique needs of breast cancer patients, such as support groups for survivors or couples counseling, further enhances the score.
Assessing the quality of care also involves examining the adherence to established clinical guidelines. Practices that follow the latest recommendations for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment receive a higher score. This includes adherence to guidelines regarding mammography frequency, the use of advanced imaging techniques, and the referral to specialists when necessary. The participation in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), further demonstrates a commitment to providing high-quality care. The availability of patient education materials, such as brochures, websites, and educational videos, also contributes to the score.
The "Breast Cancer Score" is not a static number but rather a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. The score is influenced by the availability of resources, the quality of care provided, and the integration of patient support services. The analysis would involve collecting data from various sources, including physician directories, patient reviews, and public health records. This data is then analyzed to assign a score based on the criteria outlined above. The score would be presented in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The analysis would also consider the demographic makeup of the population within ZIP Code 27047. Factors such as age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can influence breast cancer risk and access to care. Practices that are culturally sensitive and provide care that is tailored to the specific needs of the patient population receive a higher score. The availability of translation services, the provision of culturally appropriate educational materials, and the ability to communicate effectively with patients from diverse backgrounds are all important considerations.
The availability of transportation services is another critical factor, particularly in a rural area. Patients who lack reliable transportation may face significant barriers to accessing care. Practices that offer transportation assistance, such as shuttle services or partnerships with local transportation providers, receive a higher score. The location of practices, the proximity to public transportation, and the availability of parking are also important considerations.
The financial burden of breast cancer care is a significant concern for many patients. Practices that offer affordable care, accept a wide range of insurance plans, and provide financial assistance programs receive a higher score. The availability of information about financial resources, such as grants and patient assistance programs, is also important. Practices that are transparent about their billing practices and provide patients with clear and concise explanations of their bills demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care.
The integration of technology is another important factor. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to streamline patient care, improve communication, and enhance data analysis receive a higher score. The use of patient portals, which allow patients to access their medical records, schedule appointments, and communicate with their providers, is also important. Practices that embrace technology to improve the patient experience and enhance the efficiency of care delivery are well-positioned to provide high-quality breast cancer care.
In conclusion, the "Breast Cancer Score" for doctors in ZIP Code 27047 and the primary care availability in Siloam reflects a complex interplay of factors. Access to care, physician quality, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources are all critical components. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement. The ultimate goal is to empower patients with the information they need to make informed decisions about their care and to advocate for improvements in the local healthcare ecosystem.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Siloam, including the location of practices, the availability of services, and the demographic makeup of the population, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive view of the data, allowing for a deeper understanding of the healthcare ecosystem and its impact on the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like