27822, Elm City, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 27822, Elm City, North Carolina is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.52 percent of the residents in 27822 has some form of health insurance. 47.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.07 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27822 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,916 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27822. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,669 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,837 health care providers accessible to residents in 27822, Elm City, North Carolina.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Elm City, NC (ZIP Code 27822)

Analyzing the landscape of breast cancer care within Elm City, North Carolina, (ZIP Code 27822) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers factors crucial to a patient's journey, from initial screening and diagnosis to treatment and ongoing support. We'll delve into primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive 'Breast Cancer Score' assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests on readily accessible primary care. Elm City's primary care availability is a critical starting point. Evaluating this involves assessing the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing within the 27822 ZIP code and its immediate surrounding areas, coupled with an understanding of appointment wait times. A high physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a greater number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times, potentially delaying crucial screenings and early diagnoses. Conversely, a low ratio suggests better access. Researching the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or other community-based clinics is also vital, as these often serve as access points for underserved populations.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care matters. Does the local primary care community actively promote breast cancer screening guidelines, such as mammograms and clinical breast exams? Are PCPs well-versed in discussing risk factors, family history, and personalized screening recommendations? A proactive primary care environment significantly improves early detection rates, which is the cornerstone of successful treatment outcomes. Investigating the availability of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability between primary care and specialist practices is equally important. Seamless information sharing streamlines referrals and ensures continuity of care.

Identifying 'standout practices' involves recognizing those that demonstrate exceptional commitment to breast cancer care. This includes practices that offer comprehensive screening services, such as on-site mammography or partnerships with local imaging centers. They might also have dedicated patient navigators who guide patients through the complex healthcare system, coordinating appointments, providing emotional support, and educating patients about their treatment options. Furthermore, practices with a track record of patient satisfaction, as evidenced by online reviews and patient testimonials, deserve special recognition. These practices often foster a patient-centered approach that prioritizes individual needs and preferences.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. The ability to consult with physicians remotely, particularly specialists, can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas. Assessing the availability of telehealth services for breast cancer-related consultations, such as follow-up appointments, discussing test results, or receiving counseling, is essential. Telemedicine can reduce travel burdens, improve convenience, and allow patients to connect with specialists regardless of geographic limitations. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their care models are often better equipped to serve a broader patient population.

The integration of mental health resources is a vital aspect of breast cancer care, yet often overlooked. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the local healthcare system is crucial. Do local practices offer on-site counseling services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers? Are support groups available for patients and their families? The presence of these resources demonstrates a holistic approach to care, recognizing that physical health is inextricably linked to mental and emotional well-being.

A Breast Cancer Score for Elm City, NC, (27822) would be calculated by weighting these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio would be a significant component, with a higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) contributing to a better score. Primary care quality, assessed through screening promotion and EHR interoperability, would also carry considerable weight. The presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources would further enhance the score. A higher score would indicate a more robust and patient-centered healthcare environment, better equipped to support individuals navigating the complexities of breast cancer.

To determine the final score, we would need to gather data from various sources. This would include publicly available information from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, local healthcare providers, and online databases. Patient reviews and testimonials would provide valuable insights into the patient experience. This comprehensive data collection and analysis would provide a more accurate and nuanced assessment of the healthcare landscape in Elm City.

Ultimately, the goal is to provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their care. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the key elements of breast cancer care in Elm City. It highlights the importance of accessible primary care, proactive screening practices, the integration of mental health services, and the adoption of telemedicine. By focusing on these areas, the local healthcare community can work towards improving outcomes and providing the best possible care for individuals affected by breast cancer.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in Elm City and gain a visual understanding of physician locations, primary care availability, and other relevant data points, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps can offer a valuable visual representation of the data discussed, allowing for a deeper understanding of the healthcare ecosystem.