28301, Fayetteville, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28301, Fayetteville, North Carolina is 64 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 79.51 percent of the residents in 28301 has some form of health insurance. 48.93 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28301 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28301. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,470 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,531 health care providers accessible to residents in 28301, Fayetteville, North Carolina.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Fayetteville, NC (ZIP Code 28301)

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of breast cancer care within ZIP code 28301 (Fayetteville, NC), focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to assess the overall quality of care and identify areas of strength and potential improvement. This analysis is not a ranking of individual physicians, but rather a holistic assessment of the healthcare ecosystem.

Fayetteville, a city with a significant military presence and a diverse population, faces unique challenges in healthcare delivery. The presence of Fort Bragg and its associated population fluctuations impact resource allocation and the demand for medical services. Understanding the specific needs of this community is crucial for evaluating breast cancer care quality.

Primary care availability is a foundational element of effective breast cancer care. Early detection through regular screenings and preventative care is heavily reliant on a strong primary care network. In ZIP code 28301, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical factor. Analyzing the number of PCPs per capita, the average wait times for appointments, and the acceptance of various insurance plans provides a baseline understanding of access. Furthermore, the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and their role in providing care to underserved populations should be considered. These centers often play a vital role in bridging gaps in access to care, particularly for those with limited financial resources or those who may face other barriers to care.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a key indicator of healthcare access. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, a decline in the quality of care. Assessing the ratio for both PCPs and specialists (e.g., oncologists, radiologists, surgeons) within the ZIP code is essential. This analysis must also consider the geographic distribution of physicians within the area. Are physicians concentrated in certain areas, leaving other parts of the ZIP code underserved? This spatial analysis helps identify potential healthcare deserts and areas where access to care is limited.

Identifying standout practices involves evaluating those that demonstrate excellence in breast cancer care. This includes assessing their commitment to early detection, their use of evidence-based treatment protocols, and their patient-centered approach. Factors such as the availability of advanced imaging technologies (e.g., 3D mammography, MRI), the presence of multidisciplinary teams (including surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and nurses), and patient satisfaction scores are all relevant. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials and offer comprehensive support services, such as genetic counseling and survivorship programs, should be highlighted.

Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Evaluating the extent to which practices in ZIP code 28301 utilize telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and patient education is crucial. The adoption of telemedicine can reduce travel burdens, improve patient convenience, and facilitate timely access to care. The availability of virtual support groups and online educational resources also contributes to the overall quality of care. Furthermore, the ease of use of telemedicine platforms and the technical support provided to patients are important factors to consider.

The impact of a breast cancer diagnosis extends far beyond the physical realm. Mental health support is an integral part of comprehensive care. Assessing the availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is essential. Are these resources readily accessible to patients? Do practices offer integrated mental health services? The availability of support groups specifically tailored to breast cancer patients and their families is also an important consideration. Early intervention and ongoing support can significantly improve a patient's quality of life and their ability to cope with the challenges of diagnosis and treatment.

The analysis should also consider the cultural sensitivity of healthcare providers and their ability to address the unique needs of a diverse patient population. This includes assessing the availability of language services, the cultural competency of healthcare providers, and the efforts made to address health disparities. Understanding the specific needs of different demographic groups within the ZIP code is crucial for ensuring equitable access to care.

The overall assessment of breast cancer care in ZIP code 28301 should consider the interplay of all these factors. No single metric can fully capture the quality of care. A holistic approach, combining quantitative data with qualitative assessments, is essential. This includes reviewing patient outcomes data, such as survival rates and recurrence rates, and assessing patient satisfaction. The analysis should also consider the overall healthcare infrastructure of the region, including the availability of hospitals, specialized cancer centers, and support services.

In conclusion, assessing breast cancer care in Fayetteville (ZIP Code 28301) requires a multi-faceted approach. It is a complex interplay of access to primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The analysis should consider the specific needs of the community, including the impact of the military presence and the diversity of the population.

To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and identify areas of need, explore the power of spatial data analysis with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive maps that allow you to visualize healthcare data, identify trends, and make informed decisions about resource allocation. Discover how CartoChrome can help you understand the healthcare landscape in Fayetteville and beyond.