28306, Fayetteville, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28306, Fayetteville, North Carolina is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.87 percent of the residents in 28306 has some form of health insurance. 39.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.07 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28306 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 14,053 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28306. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,886 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,619 health care providers accessible to residents in 28306, Fayetteville, North Carolina.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Fayetteville, NC (ZIP Code 28306)**

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of breast cancer care resources within the 28306 ZIP code of Fayetteville, North Carolina, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and their impact on breast cancer outcomes. The core objective is to assess the landscape of care, considering factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The analysis aims to offer actionable insights for residents seeking optimal breast cancer care and to highlight potential areas for improvement within the local healthcare system.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in robust primary care. PCPs serve as the initial point of contact for patients, providing preventative screenings, early detection, and referrals to specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio within 28306 is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to increased wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potential delays in diagnosis and treatment. Assessing this ratio requires examining publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the U.S. Census Bureau. The analysis must then consider the distribution of these physicians within the ZIP code, identifying areas with potential shortages or underserved populations.

Standout practices within 28306 are those that demonstrate excellence in patient care, particularly in the realm of breast health. This involves evaluating factors such as the availability of on-site mammography services, the use of evidence-based screening guidelines, and the presence of dedicated breast health navigators. These navigators play a crucial role in guiding patients through the complex process of diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials and research initiatives also merit recognition, as they contribute to advancements in breast cancer care. Identifying these standout practices requires researching patient reviews, examining practice websites, and consulting with local healthcare experts.

Telemedicine has become an increasingly important component of healthcare delivery, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The adoption of telemedicine within 28306 is a key factor in assessing the accessibility of breast cancer care. This involves evaluating the availability of virtual consultations with PCPs, oncologists, and other specialists. Telemedicine can reduce travel burdens, improve access to care for patients with mobility limitations, and facilitate remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. The analysis must consider the types of telemedicine services offered, the platforms used, and the extent to which these services are integrated into the overall care plan.

The emotional and psychological impact of a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment is profound. The integration of mental health resources into the care continuum is therefore essential. This involves assessing the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in working with cancer patients. The analysis must consider whether these resources are readily accessible to patients within 28306, whether they are integrated into the practices of PCPs and oncologists, and whether they are covered by insurance plans. Practices that offer support groups, educational programs, and other forms of psychosocial support are particularly valuable.

Specific examples of practices in the area would be researched and analyzed. A hypothetical example might be a practice that has a high physician-to-patient ratio and offers on-site mammography and a dedicated breast health navigator. This practice would be considered a standout, while a practice with a lower ratio and no specialized services would be flagged for improvement. The analysis would also consider the integration of telemedicine services, such as virtual consultations and remote monitoring, and the availability of mental health resources, such as therapy and support groups.

Another critical aspect of the analysis is the identification of potential gaps in care. This includes assessing the availability of specialized services, such as genetic counseling and reconstructive surgery, within the 28306 ZIP code. It also involves evaluating the accessibility of these services for patients with limited financial resources or transportation challenges. The analysis must consider the demographic characteristics of the population, including age, race, and socioeconomic status, to identify potential disparities in care.

The analysis will also consider the role of community organizations and support groups in providing breast cancer care. These organizations often offer valuable resources, such as financial assistance, educational programs, and peer support. Identifying and evaluating these organizations is an important part of the overall assessment of the care landscape. The analysis would consider the types of services offered, the populations served, and the extent to which these organizations collaborate with healthcare providers.

The conclusion of the analysis will summarize the key findings and offer recommendations for improving breast cancer care within 28306. This may include recommendations for increasing the number of PCPs, expanding telemedicine services, integrating mental health resources, and promoting the use of evidence-based screening guidelines. The analysis will also highlight the importance of patient education and empowerment.

The final report will synthesize all the collected data, providing a comprehensive breast cancer care score for 28306. This score will reflect the overall quality and accessibility of care, taking into account the factors discussed above. The score will be presented in a clear and concise manner, allowing residents to easily understand the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. This score will be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers in their efforts to improve breast cancer outcomes within the community.

Ready to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Fayetteville, NC? Explore the power of spatial analysis and uncover hidden patterns with CartoChrome maps.