28393, Turkey, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.70 percent of the residents in 28393 has some form of health insurance. 52.96 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.06 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28393 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 431 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28393. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 556 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,056 health care providers accessible to residents in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28393 & Primary Care in Turkey

This analysis provides a comparative "Breast Cancer Score" (BCS) assessment, evaluating healthcare resources and access related to breast cancer care in two distinct contexts: ZIP Code 28393 in the United States and the nation of Turkey. The BCS is not a definitive clinical metric but rather a composite score reflecting the availability of key services and resources critical for early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.

**ZIP Code 28393, USA: A Local Perspective**

ZIP Code 28393, likely located in a rural or suburban area, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities regarding breast cancer care. The BCS for this area will be heavily influenced by the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), specialists (oncologists, radiologists, surgeons), and diagnostic facilities.

Physician-to-patient ratios are crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can significantly impact access to timely screenings and consultations. This can lead to delayed diagnoses and poorer outcomes. The BCS will reflect this, penalizing areas with limited physician availability. We'll need to assess the ratio of PCPs, radiologists, and oncologists to the population within 28393. Data from sources like the American Medical Association (AMA) and state health departments will be essential to inform this aspect of the score.

Standout practices, if any, will positively influence the BCS. These could include clinics offering comprehensive breast cancer screening programs, including mammography, ultrasound, and potentially MRI. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, early detection initiatives, and multidisciplinary care (integrating surgeons, oncologists, and support staff) will receive higher marks. The analysis will look for practices actively involved in community outreach and awareness campaigns.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients in rural areas to access specialists who may be located further away. The BCS will evaluate the availability of telehealth consultations for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and follow-up care. This includes the availability of virtual consultations with radiologists for reviewing mammograms, oncologists for discussing treatment plans, and therapists for providing mental health support.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are vital for breast cancer patients. The BCS will assess the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, specializing in oncology. Access to support groups, both in-person and virtual, will also be considered. The presence of integrated mental health services within primary care practices or oncology centers will be viewed favorably.

**Primary Care Availability in Turkey: A National Overview**

Evaluating breast cancer care across an entire nation like Turkey requires a broader perspective, considering national policies, healthcare infrastructure, and cultural factors. The BCS for Turkey will reflect the overall healthcare system's capacity to address breast cancer, focusing on primary care's role as a gateway to specialized services.

Physician-to-patient ratios in Turkey will be a key indicator. The distribution of physicians across the country, particularly in rural areas, will be examined. This includes assessing the availability of PCPs, radiologists, and oncologists in different regions. Data from the Turkish Ministry of Health and international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) will be used to compile this information.

Standout practices will be evaluated based on their national impact. This includes assessing the performance of university hospitals, specialized cancer centers, and private clinics. The analysis will look for evidence of advanced technologies, such as digital mammography and advanced imaging techniques, and the adoption of evidence-based treatment protocols. The availability of multidisciplinary teams and patient-centered care models will be considered.

Telemedicine adoption in Turkey is growing but may still face challenges related to infrastructure and access. The BCS will assess the availability of telemedicine services for breast cancer care, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to specialist opinions. The analysis will consider the role of the government in promoting telemedicine and the availability of technological infrastructure in rural areas.

Mental health resources in Turkey are crucial, especially considering the cultural context and the potential for stigma surrounding mental health issues. The BCS will evaluate the availability of mental health services for breast cancer patients, including access to psychiatrists, psychologists, and support groups. The analysis will consider the integration of mental health services within oncology centers and primary care practices.

**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**

Comparing the BCS for ZIP Code 28393 and Turkey reveals contrasting challenges and opportunities. 28393 may struggle with geographical limitations and potentially lower physician-to-patient ratios. Turkey, on the other hand, may face challenges related to healthcare infrastructure disparities and access to care in rural regions. Both locations must prioritize early detection, comprehensive care, and the integration of mental health services.

This analysis underscores the importance of data-driven decision-making in healthcare. Understanding the availability of resources, the adoption of new technologies, and the integration of mental health services is essential for improving breast cancer outcomes.

**Call to Action:**

For a visual representation of these findings, including the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and access to care, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a clear and concise visualization of the factors influencing the BCS for both ZIP Code 28393 and Turkey. They can help you understand the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and access to care, leading to better-informed decisions and improved outcomes.