28422, Bolivia, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28422, Bolivia, North Carolina is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.95 percent of the residents in 28422 has some form of health insurance. 57.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28422 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,339 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28422. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,599 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,979 health care providers accessible to residents in 28422, Bolivia, North Carolina.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28422 and Primary Care Availability in Bolivia**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly regarding breast cancer care, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on two distinct geographical areas: doctors within the 28422 ZIP code in the United States and primary care availability in Bolivia. A "Breast Cancer Score" is a hypothetical construct, incorporating factors crucial for early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care. It reflects the ability of a region to provide comprehensive breast cancer care, emphasizing accessibility, quality, and patient support.

**ZIP Code 28422: A Detailed Examination**

ZIP code 28422, likely a suburban or rural area in the United States, requires a nuanced evaluation. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) forms the foundation. A low PCP-to-population ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing initial screenings and referrals. A high ratio, conversely, indicates greater accessibility. Publicly available data, such as the U.S. Census Bureau and state medical boards, provides population figures and physician licensing information. This data is then used to calculate the physician-to-patient ratio. For example, if the population of 28422 is 15,000 and there are 10 PCPs, the ratio is 1:1500. This ratio is then benchmarked against national or state averages to assess relative access.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are they clustered in one area, leaving other parts of the ZIP code underserved? This requires spatial analysis, identifying areas with limited access. Furthermore, the types of practices are important. Are there any federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or community health centers (CHCs)? These often serve vulnerable populations and may offer sliding-scale fees, making care more affordable. The presence of these centers positively impacts the Breast Cancer Score.

Specialist availability is critical. The presence of oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons specializing in breast cancer is paramount. These specialists are essential for diagnosis, staging, and treatment. The Breast Cancer Score heavily weighs the proximity and availability of these specialists. A practice with a dedicated breast cancer center, offering mammography, biopsies, and surgical consultations, significantly elevates the score.

Standout practices within 28422 deserve specific attention. Identifying practices that excel in patient care, early detection programs, and patient education is crucial. This requires research into patient reviews, practice websites, and community outreach efforts. Practices actively promoting breast cancer awareness, offering free or low-cost screenings, and partnering with local organizations to provide support services would receive higher marks.

Telemedicine adoption plays a crucial role in modern healthcare. Practices utilizing telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring enhance accessibility, particularly for patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations. The Breast Cancer Score considers the extent to which practices utilize telemedicine technologies. Practices offering virtual consultations, particularly with specialists, would receive a higher score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for breast cancer patients. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally taxing. Practices offering on-site mental health services or partnerships with mental health professionals, such as therapists or support groups, positively impact the Breast Cancer Score. These resources provide crucial support for patients navigating the emotional challenges of their diagnosis and treatment.

**Primary Care Availability in Bolivia: A Comparative Analysis**

Evaluating primary care availability in Bolivia presents a different set of challenges. Data availability is likely less comprehensive than in the United States. The analysis relies on international health organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), as well as Bolivian government sources.

The physician-to-population ratio in Bolivia is a crucial starting point. Bolivia, being a developing country, may have a lower ratio than the United States. The analysis will compare this ratio to regional and global averages to assess relative access.

Geographic disparities are likely significant in Bolivia. Rural areas may have limited access to primary care compared to urban centers. The analysis will consider the distribution of physicians and healthcare facilities across different regions.

The types of healthcare facilities available are important. Are there public hospitals, private clinics, and community health posts? The availability and accessibility of these facilities, particularly in rural areas, significantly impact the Breast Cancer Score.

The presence of screening programs for breast cancer is crucial. Does the Bolivian government or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) offer mammography or other screening services? The existence and accessibility of these programs are critical for early detection.

The availability of specialists is also a concern. The analysis will consider the availability of oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons specializing in breast cancer. The number of specialists and their geographic distribution are critical factors.

The affordability of healthcare is a significant consideration. Access to breast cancer care can be limited by financial constraints. The analysis will consider the cost of consultations, screenings, and treatment.

Cultural factors also play a role. Cultural beliefs and practices can influence women's willingness to seek medical care. The analysis will consider cultural sensitivity and the availability of culturally appropriate healthcare services.

**Conclusion: A Call to Action**

Both analyses, whether in 28422 or Bolivia, demonstrate the complexity of evaluating breast cancer care access. The Breast Cancer Score, while a hypothetical construct, highlights the importance of considering physician-to-patient ratios, specialist availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and cultural factors. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving breast cancer care and ensuring that all individuals have access to the resources they need.

For a visual representation of healthcare access, resource distribution, and geographical disparities, consider exploring the power of spatial data visualization. CartoChrome maps provide a dynamic and interactive way to analyze and understand complex healthcare data. Visit CartoChrome to see how you can gain deeper insights into healthcare access and make informed decisions.