28555, Maysville, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28555, Maysville, North Carolina is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.62 percent of the residents in 28555 has some form of health insurance. 45.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28555 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 913 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 28 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28555. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,039 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,932 health care providers accessible to residents in 28555, Maysville, North Carolina.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Maysville, NC (ZIP Code 28555)

This analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of breast cancer care accessibility and quality within the Maysville, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28555) area. The goal is to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem, focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, all crucial factors in a patient’s journey through breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests upon a strong primary care infrastructure. Primary care physicians (PCPs) serve as the initial point of contact, responsible for screening, early detection, and referral to specialists. In Maysville, assessing the availability of PCPs is paramount. The analysis considers the number of practicing PCPs within the 28555 ZIP code and the surrounding areas, factoring in the population density of the region. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can lead to delayed appointments, longer wait times for screenings, and potentially, delayed diagnoses. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility and potentially improved outcomes.

Furthermore, the analysis investigates the distribution of PCPs across different practice settings. Are there predominantly solo practices, or are there larger group practices or hospital-affiliated clinics? Group practices often offer greater resources, including access to a wider range of specialists and diagnostic equipment. Hospital affiliations can also streamline the referral process and facilitate coordinated care. The presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) is also considered, as these centers often serve underserved populations and provide crucial access to care for those with limited financial resources.

Beyond the raw numbers, the analysis delves into the quality of primary care. This involves assessing factors such as the adoption of evidence-based screening guidelines, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient information sharing, and the availability of patient education materials. Practices that proactively engage in these measures are likely to provide a higher standard of care and contribute to earlier detection rates.

Specialist availability is another crucial factor. The analysis evaluates the presence of oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and other specialists within a reasonable driving distance of Maysville. The proximity of these specialists directly impacts the speed and convenience of diagnosis and treatment. Long travel distances can create significant barriers to care, particularly for patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy, which require frequent visits. The analysis considers the number of specialists, their sub-specialties (e.g., breast surgeons, medical oncologists), and their affiliations with hospitals or cancer centers.

The analysis also identifies standout practices within the area. This involves evaluating practices that demonstrate a commitment to excellence in breast cancer care. This may include practices that:

* Offer comprehensive screening programs, including mammography and other advanced imaging techniques.
* Embrace multidisciplinary care models, where specialists collaborate to develop individualized treatment plans.
* Participate in clinical trials, offering patients access to cutting-edge therapies.
* Have a strong track record of positive patient outcomes.
* Actively engage in community outreach and education initiatives.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of the analysis. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas like Maysville. The analysis assesses the availability of telehealth services for primary care appointments, specialist consultations, and follow-up care. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can provide greater convenience and reduce the burden of travel for patients. The availability of remote monitoring technologies, such as wearable devices that track vital signs, is also considered.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for patients navigating a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. The analysis investigates the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the area. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, is also considered. Cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging, and access to mental health support is crucial for patients' well-being and recovery. The analysis considers the integration of mental health services into the overall care plan, such as the availability of on-site counselors or referrals to mental health specialists.

The analysis also considers the availability of resources for financial assistance. Breast cancer treatment can be expensive, and patients may face significant financial burdens. The analysis investigates the availability of programs that provide financial assistance for treatment costs, medications, and other expenses. This includes information on local charities, government programs, and hospital-based financial assistance programs.

Finally, the analysis considers the overall patient experience. This involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction, communication between healthcare providers and patients, and the ease of navigating the healthcare system. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care are more likely to provide a positive and supportive experience. This may include practices that offer patient navigators to help patients coordinate their care and navigate the complexities of the healthcare system.

In conclusion, the breast cancer score analysis for Maysville, NC (ZIP Code 28555) provides a detailed assessment of the healthcare landscape. It highlights areas of strength and weakness, offering valuable insights for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Understanding the availability of primary care, specialist access, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and financial assistance programs is crucial for improving breast cancer outcomes in the community.

To visualize this data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Maysville and beyond, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive visualizations, allowing you to explore geographic data and identify patterns and trends.