28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.91 percent of the residents in 28652 has some form of health insurance. 22.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28652 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 37 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28652. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,166 health care providers accessible to residents in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28652 & Minneapolis Primary Care

This analysis examines the availability and quality of breast cancer-related care within ZIP Code 28652 (specific location not provided, assumed to be a rural or suburban area based on the ZIP code) and primary care accessibility in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The goal is to create a "Breast Cancer Score" reflecting the ease of access to necessary services, the quality of care provided, and the support systems available to patients. This score, while not a definitive metric, aims to offer a comparative understanding of the healthcare landscapes in these two distinct geographic areas.

**ZIP Code 28652: A Rural Perspective**

Assessing breast cancer care in a ZIP code like 28652 requires acknowledging the potential challenges inherent in a rural setting. These often include limited access to specialized medical professionals, longer travel times to appointments, and fewer readily available support services.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial starting point. In a rural area, the number of primary care physicians, oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons specializing in breast cancer care is likely lower than in an urban center. This could lead to longer wait times for appointments, delaying diagnosis and treatment. The "Breast Cancer Score" for this area would likely be negatively impacted by a low physician-to-patient ratio.

Standout practices, if any, would be those that manage to overcome these limitations. This might include clinics with a multidisciplinary approach, where primary care physicians collaborate closely with specialists. The presence of a dedicated breast cancer center, even a small one, would significantly boost the score. These centers often offer comprehensive services, including screening, diagnosis, treatment, and support, all under one roof.

Telemedicine adoption is particularly important in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, reducing the need for travel. The availability of telemedicine services for breast cancer screening, follow-up appointments, and mental health counseling would positively influence the score. The extent to which telemedicine is integrated into the local healthcare system, including insurance coverage and patient adoption, is a key factor.

Mental health resources are another critical component. A breast cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating. Access to therapists, support groups, and other mental health services is crucial for patients' well-being. The availability of these resources, and their integration with the broader healthcare system, would contribute significantly to the "Breast Cancer Score." The presence of dedicated oncology social workers, who can help patients navigate the complexities of treatment and provide emotional support, would be a major plus.

**Minneapolis: An Urban Advantage**

Minneapolis, a major metropolitan area, presents a different picture. Its higher population density generally translates to a greater concentration of healthcare providers and resources. This, in turn, should contribute to a higher "Breast Cancer Score."

The physician-to-patient ratio in Minneapolis is likely to be more favorable than in 28652. The presence of major hospitals, cancer centers, and a larger pool of specialists would mean shorter wait times and easier access to specialized care. The score would reflect this advantage.

Standout practices in Minneapolis would likely be those that excel in research, innovation, and patient-centered care. These might include hospitals with advanced imaging technology, clinical trial participation, and a strong focus on patient experience. The presence of nationally recognized cancer centers would significantly elevate the score.

Telemedicine adoption is also relevant in Minneapolis, although perhaps less critical than in a rural setting. However, telemedicine can still improve access for patients with mobility issues, those living far from the hospital, or those seeking follow-up care. The sophistication of telemedicine platforms, including the ability to share medical records and conduct virtual consultations, would influence the score.

Mental health resources in Minneapolis are likely to be more readily available than in 28652. The city's larger population and more diverse healthcare landscape should provide a wider range of mental health services. The integration of mental health support within cancer care, including on-site therapists and support groups, would be a key factor in the score. The presence of specialized mental health professionals trained in oncology would be a significant advantage.

**Comparative Analysis and Scoring Considerations**

Creating a "Breast Cancer Score" requires a nuanced approach. It's not simply about counting doctors or resources. It's about assessing the quality, accessibility, and integration of care. Factors to consider include:

* **Access to Screening:** Availability of mammography, including 3D mammography (tomosynthesis), and the ease of scheduling appointments.
* **Diagnostic Capabilities:** Access to advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI and ultrasound, and the expertise of radiologists.
* **Treatment Options:** Availability of various treatment modalities, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies.
* **Surgical Expertise:** The skill and experience of breast surgeons, including their use of minimally invasive techniques.
* **Multidisciplinary Approach:** The degree of collaboration between different specialists, such as oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and nurses.
* **Patient Support:** Availability of support groups, counseling services, and financial assistance programs.
* **Patient Satisfaction:** Patient reviews and feedback on the quality of care and the overall experience.
* **Insurance Coverage:** The extent to which insurance plans cover breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

The "Breast Cancer Score" would be a composite of these factors, weighted according to their relative importance. Minneapolis, with its greater concentration of resources, would likely receive a higher score than ZIP Code 28652. However, the score for 28652 could be improved by focusing on telemedicine, community outreach, and partnerships with larger healthcare systems.

**Conclusion**

Understanding the healthcare landscape for breast cancer patients requires detailed analysis of various factors. The "Breast Cancer Score" is a useful tool for comparing different geographic areas, highlighting strengths and weaknesses. The availability of quality care, including access to specialists, advanced technologies, and comprehensive support services, is paramount.

Want to visualize these healthcare landscapes and identify areas with the best breast cancer care? Explore the power of geographic data visualization with CartoChrome maps. See how location impacts access to care and make informed decisions about your health.