28754, Mars Hill, North Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 28754, Mars Hill, North Carolina is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.05 percent of the residents in 28754 has some form of health insurance. 40.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.66 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28754 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,859 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28754. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,071 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,607 health care providers accessible to residents in 28754, Mars Hill, North Carolina.

The analysis of breast cancer care quality and primary care availability in Mars Hill, North Carolina (ZIP code 28754) requires a nuanced understanding of several interconnected factors. This assessment aims to provide an informed perspective, focusing on physician accessibility, innovative care models, and support services crucial for patients navigating a breast cancer diagnosis and its aftermath.

Mars Hill, a small town nestled in the Appalachian Mountains, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The rural setting often translates to lower population density, potentially impacting physician-to-patient ratios and access to specialized care. Assessing the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) forms the foundation of this analysis, as PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients, guiding them through screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 28754 is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and diagnoses. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the North Carolina Medical Board should be consulted to determine the current physician-to-patient ratio in the area. This data should be compared against state and national averages to gauge the relative accessibility of primary care.

Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. The analysis must consider the types of services offered by local practices. Do they provide comprehensive wellness exams, including breast cancer screenings? Are they equipped to handle basic diagnostic tests, such as mammograms or referrals to specialists? Practices that integrate preventative care and patient education into their standard protocols are generally considered to be higher quality.

Standout practices in the area should be identified. These might be characterized by their commitment to patient-centered care, their use of technology to enhance patient experience, or their strong ties to the community. Factors to consider include patient reviews, accreditations, and the availability of extended hours or weekend appointments. It's also important to assess the practice's approach to patient communication, including the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals.

Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor in assessing healthcare accessibility, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially expanding access to specialists. The analysis should determine the extent to which local practices offer telemedicine services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient education. Practices that embrace telemedicine are often better positioned to serve patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas.

Mental health resources are an integral part of breast cancer care. A diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. The analysis should assess the availability of mental health services in the area, including therapists, counselors, and support groups. Are these services integrated into the primary care setting, or are patients required to seek them out separately? Practices that prioritize mental health support are often better equipped to provide holistic care.

The availability of breast cancer specialists is another critical consideration. The analysis should identify the presence of oncologists, surgeons, and other specialists in the area or nearby. How easily can patients access these specialists? Are there established referral pathways between primary care practices and specialists? The presence of a multidisciplinary team of specialists is a strong indicator of a robust breast cancer care system.

The analysis should also consider the availability of support services, such as patient navigators, financial counselors, and support groups. Patient navigators can help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, coordinating appointments, and providing emotional support. Financial counselors can assist patients with understanding their insurance coverage and accessing financial assistance programs. Support groups provide a valuable opportunity for patients to connect with others who have similar experiences.

The analysis should also examine the local hospital system, if any, and its capacity to provide breast cancer care. Does the hospital offer comprehensive cancer services, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy? Is the hospital accredited by reputable organizations, such as the American College of Surgeons? The presence of a well-equipped hospital with a dedicated cancer center is a significant advantage for patients.

Furthermore, the analysis should assess the availability of resources for underserved populations, such as those with limited English proficiency or those experiencing financial hardship. Are there programs in place to address health disparities and ensure that all patients have access to quality care? Practices that are committed to serving all members of the community are generally considered to be more patient-centered.

In conclusion, assessing the quality of breast cancer care and primary care availability in Mars Hill, NC (28754) requires a comprehensive approach. This analysis should consider physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of specialized services and support programs. A thorough evaluation of these factors will provide a more complete understanding of the healthcare landscape in the area.

For a detailed visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Mars Hill, including physician locations, specialist availability, and access to care, explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing healthcare data and understanding the geographic distribution of resources.