The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 08089, Waterford Works, New Jersey is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.76 percent of the residents in 08089 has some form of health insurance. 35.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08089 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 811 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 22 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08089. An estimate of 8 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 659 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 13,893 health care providers accessible to residents in 08089, Waterford Works, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08089, Waterford Works, New Jersey
Breast Cancer Score | 53 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 77 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 64 |
08089 | Waterford Works | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Waterford Works, NJ (ZIP Code 08089)
This analysis evaluates the landscape of breast cancer care and primary care availability within Waterford Works, New Jersey (ZIP code 08089). The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare resources available to residents, focusing on factors crucial for early detection, treatment, and overall well-being. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, highlights standout practices, assesses telemedicine adoption, and examines the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of breast cancer care.
The foundation of effective breast cancer management rests on accessible and responsive primary care. In Waterford Works, understanding the density of primary care physicians is paramount. The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a critical indicator. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, could potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced individual attention, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility and the potential for more proactive preventative care, including regular screenings and early detection initiatives. Data from reputable sources, such as the US Department of Health & Human Services and local healthcare networks, would be essential to accurately determine this ratio within the specific ZIP code. This data, combined with information on the age and health profile of the population in 08089, would allow for a more refined assessment of primary care adequacy.
Beyond simple physician numbers, the quality and breadth of primary care services offered are equally important. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to breast cancer screening, such as mammography referrals and patient education programs, should be recognized. Standout practices often implement proactive outreach programs, reminding patients of their screening schedules and providing readily available educational materials about breast health and risk factors. These practices often have dedicated staff, such as nurse navigators, who assist patients in navigating the complexities of the healthcare system, from scheduling appointments to coordinating specialist referrals. The presence of these resources significantly improves patient outcomes and experience.
Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, particularly in areas with limited access to specialists or those with mobility challenges. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care physicians and specialists in Waterford Works is a crucial element of this assessment. Telemedicine can facilitate remote consultations, follow-up appointments, and the delivery of educational materials. For breast cancer patients, telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for accessing specialists, receiving psychological support, and managing post-treatment care. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring capabilities, are likely to score higher in this analysis.
The emotional and psychological impact of a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment is significant. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an integral component of comprehensive care. Primary care practices and local healthcare networks that offer or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, are critical. These resources can help patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression that often accompany a cancer diagnosis. The analysis will consider the presence of on-site mental health services, partnerships with local mental health providers, and the availability of support groups specifically tailored to breast cancer patients. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan significantly improves patient well-being and treatment outcomes.
The analysis will also examine the accessibility of specialized breast cancer care within and around Waterford Works. This includes the availability of oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists. Proximity to reputable cancer centers and hospitals equipped with advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies is a significant factor. The ability to receive timely and comprehensive care, including access to clinical trials and innovative therapies, is essential for optimal outcomes. Practices that have established strong relationships with these specialists and cancer centers are likely to provide better care.
Assessing the overall quality of care also requires consideration of patient satisfaction. Reviewing patient testimonials, online ratings, and feedback from patient advocacy groups provides valuable insights into the patient experience. Practices with positive patient feedback, demonstrating a commitment to compassionate care, clear communication, and patient empowerment, will be prioritized. The analysis will incorporate data from various sources, including patient surveys and online reviews, to provide a comprehensive assessment of patient satisfaction.
The evaluation will also consider the socioeconomic factors that may impact access to care. The analysis will consider whether practices accept a variety of insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, and whether they offer financial assistance programs to patients who are uninsured or underinsured. Addressing these socioeconomic barriers is crucial to ensuring that all residents of Waterford Works have equal access to quality breast cancer care. Practices that are actively working to address these disparities will be recognized for their commitment to equitable care.
In conclusion, this ‘Breast Cancer Score’ analysis for Waterford Works, NJ (08089) provides a comprehensive overview of the healthcare resources available to residents. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, highlighting standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources, the analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape. This information is crucial for residents seeking to make informed decisions about their healthcare and for healthcare providers seeking to improve the quality and accessibility of their services.
To visualize and further explore the healthcare landscape in Waterford Works and beyond, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing geographic data, including the location of healthcare providers, the distribution of resources, and the demographics of the population. Using CartoChrome maps can provide a more detailed and interactive understanding of the factors discussed in this analysis.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like