The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 15206, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is 92 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.56 percent of the residents in 15206 has some form of health insurance. 33.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.55 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15206 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,811 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 201 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15206. An estimate of 171 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,324 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 68,639 health care providers accessible to residents in 15206, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15206, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 48 |
---|---|
People Score | 8 |
Provider Score | 92 |
Hospital Score | 23 |
Travel Score | 67 |
15206 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis assesses the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 15206, focusing on physician availability, quality of care, and support resources, while also considering the broader context of primary care access in Pittsburgh. This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the resources available to patients in their fight against breast cancer.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric for assessing healthcare access. In 15206, a detailed analysis of the ratio of primary care physicians (PCPs), oncologists, and radiologists to the population is essential. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Allegheny County Health Department, combined with information from professional organizations like the American Medical Association (AMA), can provide a baseline. This data should be further refined to identify specialists specifically focused on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of physicians, may lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and ultimately, poorer patient outcomes.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care provided by these physicians is paramount. This involves examining factors like board certifications, years of experience, and patient satisfaction scores. Websites like the U.S. News & World Report and Healthgrades often provide physician profiles, including information on board certifications and patient reviews. However, these resources should be interpreted with caution, as they may not always reflect the full scope of a physician's expertise or the nuances of their practice. The analysis must also consider the integration of evidence-based practices, adherence to national guidelines for breast cancer screening and treatment, and the availability of advanced technologies, such as 3D mammography and minimally invasive surgical techniques.
Standout practices within 15206 should be identified based on their comprehensive approach to breast cancer care. These practices often integrate a multidisciplinary team, including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and nurses. They may also offer specialized services, such as genetic counseling, survivorship programs, and access to clinical trials. The analysis should highlight practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, focusing on communication, empathy, and shared decision-making.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis should assess the extent to which physicians in 15206 offer telehealth services for consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients who live in remote areas or have mobility limitations. It can also reduce the burden of travel and potentially lower healthcare costs. The analysis should consider the types of telemedicine platforms used, the availability of virtual appointments, and the integration of telehealth services into the overall care plan.
Mental health resources are an integral part of breast cancer care. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues. The analysis must evaluate the availability of mental health services within 15206, including access to therapists, counselors, and support groups. It should also assess the integration of mental health services into the overall care plan, such as screening for mental health issues and referrals to appropriate resources. The presence of support groups, both in-person and online, is particularly important for providing patients with a sense of community and shared experience.
The broader context of primary care availability in Pittsburgh is crucial. Primary care physicians play a vital role in early detection of breast cancer through regular screenings and referrals to specialists. The analysis should consider the overall availability of PCPs in Pittsburgh, including physician-to-patient ratios and wait times for appointments. It should also assess the accessibility of primary care services, such as the acceptance of various insurance plans and the availability of evening and weekend appointments. A strong primary care infrastructure can help ensure that patients receive timely screenings and referrals, leading to earlier diagnoses and improved outcomes.
Specific examples of practices within 15206 to be examined include, but are not limited to, those affiliated with UPMC and Allegheny Health Network. Each practice should be examined for their specific offerings, including the availability of genetic testing, advanced imaging techniques, and access to clinical trials. Furthermore, the analysis should consider the integration of these practices with community resources, such as local support groups and patient advocacy organizations.
The analysis must also consider the socioeconomic factors that can influence access to care. These factors include income levels, insurance coverage, and transportation options. The analysis should identify any disparities in access to care based on these factors and suggest strategies for addressing them. This may include outreach programs, financial assistance, and transportation services.
In conclusion, assessing the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care in 15206 requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by physicians, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the broader context of primary care availability in Pittsburgh. By conducting a comprehensive analysis, we can identify areas of strength and weakness and develop strategies for improving the care provided to patients in their fight against breast cancer.
To visualize this complex data and explore the geographic distribution of resources, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful tool for understanding the landscape of breast cancer care in 15206 and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like