The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 15482, Star Junction, Pennsylvania is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.86 percent of the residents in 15482 has some form of health insurance. 54.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15482 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 23 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15482. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 103 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 229 health care providers accessible to residents in 15482, Star Junction, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15482, Star Junction, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 46 |
---|---|
People Score | 55 |
Provider Score | 43 |
Hospital Score | 44 |
Travel Score | 45 |
15482 | Star Junction | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Star Junction, PA (ZIP Code 15482)
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer care within the 15482 ZIP code, encompassing the Star Junction, PA area. We will assess the landscape of primary care physicians, their capacity to manage breast health, and the supporting resources available to patients. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem's strengths and weaknesses in addressing this critical health concern.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in strong primary care. Early detection is paramount, and primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for patients. They are responsible for routine screenings, patient education, and timely referrals to specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio within 15482 is a crucial indicator. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians serving a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Researching the exact physician-to-patient ratio requires access to specific demographic and healthcare provider data, which is beyond the scope of this analysis. However, understanding this ratio is the initial step in evaluating the accessibility of care.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is equally important. The analysis necessitates investigating the practices and their approach to breast health. Are PCPs actively promoting mammogram screenings according to current guidelines? Do they have established protocols for referring patients with suspicious findings to specialists? Do they offer patient education materials on breast cancer risk factors, self-exams, and the importance of early detection? Practices demonstrating a proactive approach to breast health, including robust screening programs and patient education initiatives, would receive a higher score.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into their operations. This includes reviewing patient testimonials, if available, and assessing their integration with local specialists. Practices that have established strong referral networks with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons are better positioned to provide comprehensive care. Furthermore, practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively can improve care coordination and ensure seamless information sharing between providers. The presence of certified nurse navigators, who assist patients through the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, would also significantly enhance a practice's score.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations can improve access to care, especially for patients who live in rural areas or have mobility limitations. Telemedicine can be particularly valuable for follow-up appointments, discussing test results, and providing emotional support. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms and offer virtual visits would receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to patient convenience and accessibility.
Mental health resources are an integral component of breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health support, either within the primary care practice or through referrals to external providers, is essential. Practices that offer on-site counseling services or have established relationships with mental health professionals would receive a higher score. This support can include individual therapy, group support sessions, and access to resources like support groups and educational materials.
The availability of specialized breast cancer services, such as diagnostic imaging (mammography, ultrasound, MRI) and surgical oncology, within a reasonable distance from Star Junction is also a critical consideration. Patients benefit from having access to these services locally, reducing travel time and the associated stress. Proximity to comprehensive cancer centers with multidisciplinary teams, including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and breast surgeons, is highly advantageous. The analysis needs to assess the proximity and accessibility of these specialized services, considering factors like travel time, insurance coverage, and patient wait times.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of supportive services, such as physical therapy, lymphedema management, and nutritional counseling. These services are essential for helping patients manage the side effects of treatment and improve their quality of life. Practices that offer these supportive services or have established referral networks would receive a higher score.
Finally, the analysis should assess the affordability of care. This includes examining the acceptance of various insurance plans, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the transparency of pricing. The cost of breast cancer care can be substantial, and access to affordable care is crucial for all patients. Practices that prioritize affordability and offer financial counseling services would receive a higher score.
In conclusion, evaluating the breast cancer care landscape in Star Junction (15482) is a multifaceted process. It involves assessing the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the proximity of specialized services. Practices that demonstrate a proactive approach to breast health, prioritize patient education, and offer comprehensive support services will receive a higher score. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the resources available and identify areas for improvement.
To visualize the healthcare landscape in 15482 and beyond, including the location of physicians, specialists, hospitals, and support services, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data discussed in this analysis, making it easier to understand the accessibility and availability of breast cancer care in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like