15551, Markleton, Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 15551, Markleton, Pennsylvania is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.37 percent of the residents in 15551 has some form of health insurance. 43.85 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15551 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 152 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15551. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 176 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 732 health care providers accessible to residents in 15551, Markleton, Pennsylvania.

Please note: I am an AI and cannot provide medical advice or create a "Breast Cancer Score" as that would require specialized medical expertise and access to sensitive patient data. Furthermore, I cannot definitively rank doctors or practices. This response provides a hypothetical framework for such an analysis, focusing on the elements that might be considered.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Hypothetical Framework for Markleton, PA (ZIP Code 15551)**

The task is to develop a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" analysis for physicians within the 15551 ZIP code, focusing on primary care availability in the town of Markleton, Pennsylvania. This analysis, were it real, would aim to provide insights into the accessibility and quality of care related to breast cancer prevention, detection, and support within the local healthcare landscape. The following outlines the potential components of such a study.

The first critical element of any such analysis would be an assessment of physician-to-patient ratios. Data collection would involve identifying the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists (e.g., oncologists, radiologists, surgeons) practicing within the 15551 ZIP code. This information would be compared to the estimated population of Markleton and the surrounding areas, considering factors like age distribution and demographics. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for specialists, could indicate potential challenges in accessing timely care, impacting the overall score. The availability of specialized breast cancer care, such as dedicated breast centers, would also be factored in.

Another crucial area would be the examination of standout practices. This would involve identifying practices that demonstrate excellence in breast cancer care. This could be determined through several avenues. Reviewing patient testimonials and online reviews, while not always definitive, can offer valuable insights into patient experiences. The analysis would also consider the accreditation status of medical facilities, such as whether they are accredited by the American College of Surgeons for their breast cancer programs. Practices with advanced technology, such as 3D mammography (tomosynthesis), would be viewed favorably.

The analysis would also examine the availability of support services. This includes access to genetic counseling for individuals with a family history of breast cancer, as well as the availability of patient navigators. Patient navigators play a critical role in guiding patients through the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. The presence of support groups, both in-person and online, would also contribute positively to the score, providing patients with emotional support and a sense of community.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Markleton. The study would assess the extent to which local practices offer telemedicine services for breast cancer-related consultations, follow-up appointments, and educational sessions. Telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies would receive higher scores in this category. The types of telemedicine platforms used, such as secure video conferencing, would also be considered.

Mental health resources are an integral part of comprehensive breast cancer care. The analysis would investigate the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, who specialize in supporting cancer patients. Access to these resources is vital, as a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging. The analysis would consider the proximity of mental health providers to primary care practices and the existence of collaborative care models.

The study would also consider the availability of preventive care services. This includes the frequency with which PCPs offer breast cancer screening recommendations, such as mammograms and clinical breast exams, based on current guidelines. The analysis would also assess the effectiveness of patient education programs regarding breast cancer risk factors, early detection, and self-exams. Practices that actively promote preventive care would be viewed positively.

The analysis would also consider the availability of financial assistance programs. Breast cancer treatment can be expensive, and the availability of financial resources can significantly impact a patient's ability to access care. The study would investigate whether local practices provide information about financial assistance programs, such as grants, co-pay assistance, and payment plans. The existence of partnerships with local charities or organizations that offer financial support would also be a factor.

The study would consider the integration of data analytics. This would involve assessing whether local practices use data analytics to track patient outcomes, identify areas for improvement, and personalize care. Practices that utilize data analytics to improve the quality and efficiency of breast cancer care would receive higher scores. This could include tracking screening rates, treatment outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

The analysis would also assess the cultural sensitivity of local practices. This includes evaluating whether practices have staff who speak multiple languages, offer culturally appropriate educational materials, and are sensitive to the needs of diverse patient populations. Practices that prioritize cultural sensitivity would receive higher scores, as this can improve patient engagement and outcomes.

The final "Breast Cancer Score" for each physician or practice would be a composite score, derived from the weighted scores across all the aforementioned categories. The weighting of each category would be determined based on its relative importance in the context of breast cancer care. The final score would provide a snapshot of the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care in the 15551 ZIP code. The analysis would also include a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape, as well as recommendations for improvement.

This hypothetical analysis, while focused on the Markleton area, highlights the complex factors that contribute to the quality of breast cancer care. The availability of resources, the adoption of technology, and the commitment to patient-centered care are all essential components. Such an analysis, if real, would be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Markleton and surrounding areas, including physician locations, hospital locations, and the availability of various services, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a comprehensive and interactive view of the data, allowing you to explore the healthcare resources in your area and make informed decisions about your care.