The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 16151, Sheakleyville, Pennsylvania is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 16151 has some form of health insurance. 23.60 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16151 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 22 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16151. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,354 health care providers accessible to residents in 16151, Sheakleyville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16151, Sheakleyville, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 79 |
---|---|
People Score | 55 |
Provider Score | 65 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 59 |
16151 | Sheakleyville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of breast cancer care within ZIP code 16151, encompassing Sheakleyville, requires a nuanced examination of available resources. This assessment goes beyond simple counts, delving into the quality, accessibility, and integration of services, particularly concerning primary care physicians and their capacity to address breast cancer concerns. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem in supporting patients through prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship.
Physician-to-patient ratios form a crucial starting point. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative screenings, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and state health departments can provide insights into the number of primary care physicians, oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons practicing within the ZIP code. However, these figures alone are insufficient.
It is essential to consider the *type* of physicians. Are there enough board-certified specialists in oncology, radiology, and surgery? The presence of a dedicated breast cancer specialist, for example, can significantly impact patient outcomes. Furthermore, the age and experience of the physicians matter. Experienced practitioners often possess a deeper understanding of complex cases and a broader network of referral resources.
Beyond the raw numbers, the *geographic distribution* of physicians is critical. Sheakleyville, being a rural area, might face challenges in terms of physician density. Are the doctors concentrated in one specific location, or are they dispersed throughout the community? This dispersion affects travel times, which can be a significant barrier for patients, especially those undergoing treatment.
Another vital aspect is the *availability of primary care*. Primary care physicians are the gatekeepers to the healthcare system. They are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms or seeking preventative care. Their ability to perform breast exams, order mammograms, and refer patients to specialists is crucial. The analysis must evaluate the number of primary care physicians in Sheakleyville, their patient load, and the ease with which patients can schedule appointments.
Standout practices, if any, within the ZIP code merit specific attention. These practices might demonstrate excellence in patient care, innovative approaches to treatment, or a strong commitment to community outreach. Identifying these practices requires a multifaceted approach. Patient reviews, quality metrics (if available), and physician certifications are key indicators.
The adoption of telemedicine is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge the gap in access to care by allowing patients to consult with specialists remotely. The analysis should assess the extent to which physicians in the area utilize telemedicine platforms for consultations, follow-up appointments, and patient education.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are vital for breast cancer patients. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally and psychologically challenging. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, is crucial for supporting patients through their journey. The analysis should identify the availability of mental health services in Sheakleyville, including the number of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the ease with which patients can access these resources.
The integration of services is another critical factor. Does the healthcare system in Sheakleyville offer a coordinated approach to breast cancer care? Are there established referral pathways between primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health professionals? A coordinated approach can improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on patients.
The analysis should also consider the availability of support groups and educational resources. Support groups provide a safe space for patients to share their experiences, receive emotional support, and learn from others who have gone through similar challenges. Educational resources, such as pamphlets, websites, and workshops, can empower patients to make informed decisions about their care.
The assessment of breast cancer care in Sheakleyville must also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors. Poverty, lack of transportation, and limited access to insurance can all create barriers to care. The analysis should examine the prevalence of these factors in the community and their potential impact on patient outcomes.
Furthermore, the analysis should evaluate the availability of financial assistance programs. Breast cancer treatment can be expensive, and many patients struggle to afford the costs of care. The analysis should identify any programs that offer financial assistance to patients, such as grants, scholarships, or payment plans.
Finally, the analysis should assess the quality of the local hospitals. Do the hospitals have modern equipment, such as digital mammography machines and advanced imaging technology? Do they have experienced staff, including radiologists, surgeons, and nurses? The quality of the hospital can significantly impact patient outcomes.
In conclusion, the breast cancer care landscape in Sheakleyville (ZIP code 16151) demands a comprehensive evaluation. Assessing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and examining mental health resources are all crucial. A thorough analysis of these factors, combined with consideration of socioeconomic factors and the integration of services, provides a clearer picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
For a visual representation of this data, including geographic distribution of resources and a comparative analysis of healthcare access, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their interactive platform can help you visualize and understand the complexities of breast cancer care in Sheakleyville.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like