16160, West Pittsburg, Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 16160, West Pittsburg, Pennsylvania is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.02 percent of the residents in 16160 has some form of health insurance. 67.84 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16160 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 169 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16160. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 243 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,410 health care providers accessible to residents in 16160, West Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.

The analysis below provides a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" ranking for primary care physicians in the 16160 ZIP code (West Pittsburg, Pennsylvania), considering factors relevant to breast cancer care and patient access. This is a simulated assessment, and actual data would be required for a definitive ranking. The goal is to illustrate how such an analysis might be structured.

The foundation of a strong "Breast Cancer Score" rests on several key pillars. These include the availability of primary care, the quality of those providers, the accessibility of specialized care (like mammography and oncology), and the integration of supportive services. In the context of West Pittsburg, a rural area, the availability of primary care becomes paramount.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can create significant barriers to timely care. In the 16160 ZIP code, we would need to assess the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing and compare that to the population. Publicly available data from the US Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health would be essential for this calculation. A concerningly high ratio would immediately lower the "Breast Cancer Score" for the entire area.

Beyond raw numbers, we must evaluate the quality of the existing primary care. This includes factors such as board certifications, years of experience, and patient satisfaction scores. Publicly available resources, such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and Healthgrades, can provide some insights, though their coverage may vary. We would need to research the specific credentials and experience of each PCP practicing in 16160. Practices with a high concentration of board-certified physicians and a proven track record of positive patient outcomes would receive a higher score.

Accessibility is another critical component. This involves not just the physical location of the practices but also their hours of operation, appointment availability, and acceptance of various insurance plans. Practices offering extended hours, weekend appointments, and a wide range of insurance coverage would be more accessible and therefore score higher. The ability to schedule appointments online and the presence of multilingual staff would also be considered.

A crucial aspect of the "Breast Cancer Score" is the integration of breast cancer screening and early detection services. This includes access to mammography. We would need to identify the nearest facilities offering mammograms and assess the ease of scheduling appointments. Ideally, primary care practices would have strong referral relationships with these facilities, ensuring seamless transitions for patients needing screenings. Practices that actively promote breast cancer screening and provide educational materials would also receive a boost in their score.

Telemedicine adoption is a vital consideration, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical gaps, enabling patients to access consultations and follow-up care remotely. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments for routine check-ups and consultations, would score higher. This is especially important for patients who may have difficulty traveling to appointments.

The availability of mental health resources is another key factor. A breast cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health support is crucial for patients' well-being. We would need to identify the availability of mental health professionals (psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists) in the West Pittsburg area and assess their integration with primary care practices. Practices that have established referral pathways to mental health services and offer support groups or counseling within their practice would receive a higher score.

Standout practices in the 16160 ZIP code would be those that excel in multiple areas. For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, board-certified physicians, extended hours, strong referral relationships with mammography facilities, and telemedicine capabilities would be considered a high-scoring practice. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs, promoting breast cancer awareness and providing educational resources, would also be recognized.

In the absence of specific data, it is impossible to definitively rank practices in 16160. However, a hypothetical example could be constructed. Let's say "Family Health Associates" has a relatively low physician-to-patient ratio, offers extended hours, accepts most insurance plans, and has a strong relationship with a local mammography center. They also offer telemedicine appointments for follow-up visits. Their "Breast Cancer Score" would be higher than a practice with a higher physician-to-patient ratio, limited hours, and no telemedicine capabilities.

The overall availability of primary care in West Pittsburg is a critical factor. If the area suffers from a shortage of PCPs, the "Breast Cancer Score" for the entire region will be negatively impacted, regardless of the quality of individual practices. Efforts to recruit and retain physicians in the area would be essential to improve the score and ensure adequate access to care.

The "Breast Cancer Score" is not just about the individual practices; it's about the entire healthcare ecosystem. The presence of support groups, patient navigators, and community health initiatives also contribute to a higher score. These resources can help patients navigate the complexities of breast cancer care and provide emotional support.

In conclusion, a comprehensive "Breast Cancer Score" analysis for West Pittsburg (16160) would consider physician-to-patient ratios, physician qualifications, accessibility, telemedicine adoption, integration of breast cancer screening, mental health resources, and the presence of supportive services. This simulated analysis highlights the key factors involved in assessing the quality and accessibility of breast cancer care in a specific geographic area.

For a deeper understanding of healthcare access and resource allocation in West Pittsburg and beyond, and to visualize these complex datasets, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you analyze and understand the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas of need, and make informed decisions about healthcare planning and delivery. Visit CartoChrome today to unlock the power of location intelligence.