16342, Polk, Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 16342, Polk, Pennsylvania is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.51 percent of the residents in 16342 has some form of health insurance. 49.11 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16342 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 385 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16342. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 634 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 731 health care providers accessible to residents in 16342, Polk, Pennsylvania.

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer care within the specified geographic parameters: doctors in ZIP Code 16342 and primary care availability in Polk. We will explore key factors influencing patient outcomes, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, culminating in a call to action for advanced mapping tools.

ZIP Code 16342, a rural area, presents unique challenges for healthcare access. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative screenings, and delayed diagnoses. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards would be essential to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 16342. This ratio directly impacts the ‘Breast Cancer Score’ for the area. A higher ratio, indicating better access, would positively influence the score. Conversely, a lower ratio would negatively impact it, signaling a need for increased resources and outreach.

Assessing primary care availability in Polk requires a broader perspective. Polk County, encompassing multiple ZIP codes, needs a county-wide analysis. The number of primary care physicians per 1,000 residents is a crucial metric. A robust primary care infrastructure is the foundation for early detection and effective management of breast cancer. Primary care physicians often serve as the initial point of contact, performing breast exams, ordering mammograms, and referring patients to specialists. A shortage of primary care physicians can lead to delayed diagnoses and poorer outcomes. This impacts the ‘Breast Cancer Score’ by influencing the likelihood of timely screenings and referrals.

Identifying ‘standout practices’ within 16342 or Polk County requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves reviewing patient reviews, analyzing practice performance data (if available), and assessing the availability of comprehensive services. Practices excelling in breast cancer care often demonstrate several key characteristics. They may offer state-of-the-art imaging technology, such as 3D mammography (tomosynthesis). They might have dedicated breast health centers staffed by specialized radiologists, surgeons, and oncologists. They may participate in clinical trials, providing patients with access to cutting-edge treatments. Furthermore, standout practices prioritize patient education and support, offering resources like support groups and educational materials. These practices would significantly elevate the ‘Breast Cancer Score’.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas like 16342. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists remotely. This is particularly valuable for follow-up appointments, consultations, and access to second opinions. The availability of telemedicine services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online educational resources, can significantly enhance the ‘Breast Cancer Score’. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to improving patient access and convenience. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine depends on reliable internet access and patient comfort with technology, considerations that must be factored into the overall assessment.

Mental health resources are an integral part of comprehensive breast cancer care. A diagnosis of breast cancer can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care model are better equipped to support patients throughout their journey. This includes providing access to therapists, counselors, and support groups. The availability of mental health resources, either within the practice or through referrals, is a crucial factor in the ‘Breast Cancer Score’. Practices that prioritize mental well-being demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care, improving overall quality of life.

The ‘Breast Cancer Score’ for doctors in ZIP Code 16342 and primary care availability in Polk would be a composite measure. It would incorporate the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of primary care physicians, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. Each factor would be weighted based on its relative importance in influencing patient outcomes. A higher score would indicate better access to care, more comprehensive services, and a greater likelihood of positive outcomes. A lower score would signal areas for improvement, highlighting the need for increased resources, improved access, and enhanced support services.

To obtain a truly comprehensive understanding of breast cancer care in these areas, detailed data collection and analysis are essential. This includes gathering information from various sources, such as medical databases, patient surveys, and public health reports. The analysis should also consider demographic factors, such as age, race, and socioeconomic status, as these can influence access to care and health outcomes. The ‘Breast Cancer Score’ should be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare resources and practices.

For a visual representation of this data, and to identify areas of need and opportunity, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can visually represent the data, allowing for a spatial analysis of healthcare resources and patient outcomes. CartoChrome maps can highlight areas with low physician-to-patient ratios, limited access to specialists, and a lack of mental health resources. This visual approach can inform decision-making, guide resource allocation, and support efforts to improve breast cancer care in these communities.