16423, Lake City, Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 16423, Lake City, Pennsylvania is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.01 percent of the residents in 16423 has some form of health insurance. 41.57 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.44 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16423 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,119 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16423. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 666 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 582 health care providers accessible to residents in 16423, Lake City, Pennsylvania.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Lake City, PA (ZIP Code 16423)

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer care within ZIP code 16423 (Lake City, Pennsylvania), focusing on primary care access, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive “Breast Cancer Score” assessment, offering insights for residents seeking quality healthcare and highlighting areas for potential improvement. This score is not a definitive ranking but rather a nuanced evaluation based on available data and publicly accessible information.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in accessible primary care. In Lake City, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a crucial factor. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is a starting point. Publicly available data, such as that from the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) or state medical boards, can provide estimates of the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the population they serve. A lower ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. However, this data alone is insufficient. We must also consider the types of practices available. Are there solo practitioners, or are there larger group practices? Group practices often offer a broader range of services and may have better infrastructure for coordinating care.

Furthermore, the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or other community health clinics is significant. These facilities often provide care to underserved populations and may offer sliding-scale fees, making healthcare more accessible to those with limited financial resources. The existence of these centers directly impacts the overall “Breast Cancer Score” by increasing access to preventative care, including mammograms and breast exams, which are crucial for early detection.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care matters. Practices that prioritize preventative care, including regular screenings and patient education about breast cancer risk factors, are highly valued. This includes practices that actively remind patients of screening appointments and provide resources for self-exams. The availability of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability are also critical. EHRs facilitate communication between PCPs and specialists, ensuring that patient information is readily available and that care is coordinated effectively.

Identifying standout practices involves looking beyond basic access metrics. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, as evidenced by patient reviews, accreditation status, and participation in quality improvement programs, deserve recognition. Examining online reviews (while acknowledging their inherent limitations) can provide insights into patient experiences, including wait times, staff responsiveness, and the overall quality of care. Accreditation by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) often signifies a commitment to quality standards and patient safety.

The adoption of telemedicine is a growing trend in healthcare, and its impact on breast cancer care is significant. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients who live in rural areas or have mobility limitations. It allows for virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. In Lake City, assessing the availability of telemedicine services among PCPs and specialists is crucial. Do practices offer virtual appointments? Are they equipped with the necessary technology to provide these services effectively? Practices that embrace telemedicine can significantly improve the “Breast Cancer Score” by enhancing access and convenience.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but essential component of breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can be incredibly stressful, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and support groups, is critical for supporting patients' emotional well-being. Assessing the availability of these resources within the community is a key factor in the “Breast Cancer Score.” Are there mental health professionals who specialize in cancer-related issues? Are there support groups for breast cancer survivors? The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Specialist availability is also critical. While primary care provides the foundation, access to oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists is essential for diagnosis and treatment. The proximity of these specialists to Lake City is an important factor. If patients must travel long distances for specialist appointments, it can create barriers to care. The presence of a local hospital with a dedicated oncology department or affiliation with a larger cancer center can significantly improve the “Breast Cancer Score.”

Finally, consider the overall healthcare ecosystem. Are there community resources available to support breast cancer patients? This includes organizations that provide financial assistance, transportation to appointments, or educational programs. The presence of these resources can significantly improve the patient experience and contribute to a higher “Breast Cancer Score.”

In conclusion, assessing the “Breast Cancer Score” for Lake City, PA (ZIP Code 16423) requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating the availability of primary care physicians, physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of specialist care. By considering all these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and identify areas for improvement. This analysis serves as a starting point for further investigation and should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Lake City and surrounding areas, including the location of practices, specialist availability, and access to resources, we encourage you to explore the power of spatial data visualization. **Visit CartoChrome maps to visualize and analyze healthcare data for Lake City and gain a deeper understanding of the breast cancer care landscape.**