The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 17255, Shade Gap, Pennsylvania is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.90 percent of the residents in 17255 has some form of health insurance. 49.70 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.27 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17255 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 279 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17255. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 314 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,791 health care providers accessible to residents in 17255, Shade Gap, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17255, Shade Gap, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 84 |
---|---|
People Score | 70 |
Provider Score | 78 |
Hospital Score | 65 |
Travel Score | 33 |
17255 | Shade Gap | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP Code 17255, encompassing Shade Gap, Pennsylvania, focusing on primary care availability and assessing the quality of care accessible to patients. The assessment considers factors critical to a patient's journey, from initial screening to supportive care, while also examining the impact of telemedicine and mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview to inform healthcare decisions and highlight areas for potential improvement.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests on accessible primary care. Shade Gap, being a rural community, faces inherent challenges in this regard. Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors for a larger population, can lead to delayed appointments, less personalized care, and ultimately, potential delays in diagnosis and treatment. While specific, up-to-the-minute physician-to-patient ratios are difficult to obtain publicly, the general trend in rural areas suggests a scarcity of primary care physicians compared to more urban centers. This scarcity necessitates a careful evaluation of existing resources and the strategies employed to maximize their impact.
Standout practices within the area, if any, would be those demonstrating a commitment to proactive screening and patient education. This includes practices that actively encourage mammograms, offer clear and concise information about breast cancer risk factors, and provide readily available resources for patients to understand their diagnosis and treatment options. These practices would likely also demonstrate a focus on patient-centered care, ensuring that patients feel heard, supported, and actively involved in their healthcare decisions. The presence of nurse navigators, who guide patients through the complexities of the healthcare system, is a significant indicator of quality.
Telemedicine adoption plays a vital role in bridging the geographical gap in rural communities. The ability to consult with specialists remotely, receive follow-up care via video calls, and access educational materials online can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms and integrated them seamlessly into their workflows are likely to offer a more convenient and accessible healthcare experience. This includes offering virtual consultations for initial assessments, follow-up appointments, and even support groups. The success of telemedicine, however, depends on factors like reliable internet access, digital literacy among patients, and the willingness of physicians to adopt new technologies.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of breast cancer care. A diagnosis of breast cancer can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, are demonstrating a commitment to holistic care. This could involve on-site therapists, referrals to local mental health providers, or the integration of mental health screenings into routine checkups. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, is also a valuable resource for patients to connect with others who understand their experiences.
The evaluation of breast cancer care in Shade Gap also requires a consideration of the broader healthcare ecosystem. This includes the availability of specialized services, such as oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists, within a reasonable distance. The proximity to hospitals equipped with advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies is also a significant factor. Furthermore, the coordination of care between different healthcare providers is essential to ensure a seamless and effective patient experience. This involves clear communication, shared medical records, and a collaborative approach to treatment planning.
Assessing the quality of care also involves examining the patient experience. This includes factors such as wait times for appointments, the ease of scheduling, the clarity of communication from healthcare providers, and the overall level of satisfaction with the care received. Patient feedback, through surveys and reviews, provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system. The practices that actively solicit and respond to patient feedback are more likely to improve their services and meet the needs of their patients effectively.
In the context of Shade Gap, the challenges of rural healthcare are amplified. Limited access to specialists, potential transportation difficulties, and the social isolation that can accompany a cancer diagnosis all contribute to the complexity of the situation. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach, including efforts to recruit and retain healthcare professionals, expand telemedicine services, and increase access to mental health resources. Community initiatives, such as mobile mammography units and educational programs, can also play a crucial role in improving early detection and patient outcomes.
The evaluation of breast cancer care within ZIP Code 17255 is an ongoing process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatments, and approaches to patient care emerging regularly. Continuous monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation are essential to ensure that patients in Shade Gap have access to the best possible care. This includes staying informed about the latest advancements in breast cancer research, implementing evidence-based practices, and actively engaging with patients to understand their needs and preferences.
The analysis of breast cancer care in Shade Gap reveals a complex interplay of challenges and opportunities. The success of the healthcare system depends on the commitment of healthcare providers, the availability of resources, and the active participation of patients. Addressing the specific needs of this rural community requires a comprehensive approach that considers all aspects of the patient journey, from prevention and early detection to treatment and supportive care. The goal is to ensure that every patient in Shade Gap has the opportunity to receive the best possible care and achieve the best possible outcomes.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Shade Gap and surrounding areas, including the location of healthcare providers, the availability of specialized services, and the accessibility of resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. These maps provide a valuable tool for visualizing the data discussed in this analysis and making informed decisions about your healthcare.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like