The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 17262, Spring Run, Pennsylvania is 66 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.82 percent of the residents in 17262 has some form of health insurance. 28.60 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17262 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 170 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17262. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 120 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,495 health care providers accessible to residents in 17262, Spring Run, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17262, Spring Run, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 53 |
---|---|
People Score | 27 |
Provider Score | 66 |
Hospital Score | 67 |
Travel Score | 36 |
17262 | Spring Run | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 17262 and Spring Run Primary Care
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of breast cancer care within ZIP code 17262, focusing on primary care access in the Spring Run area. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Breast Cancer Score" perspective, evaluating factors crucial for early detection, diagnosis, and support. This score is not a numerical rating but a qualitative assessment of the landscape.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in accessible primary care. Spring Run, a specific area within 17262, is a critical point of focus. Primary care physicians (PCPs) serve as the initial point of contact, guiding patients through screenings, referrals, and ongoing management. A shortage of PCPs or limited appointment availability can significantly delay the crucial early stages of detection. Physician-to-patient ratios are a key metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per patient, can strain resources, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially hindering proactive care. Investigating the current PCP-to-patient ratio within Spring Run is essential to understanding the baseline access to care.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the proactive nature of physicians regarding breast cancer screening guidelines. Do PCPs routinely discuss mammogram recommendations based on age and risk factors? Are patients educated about self-exams and other early detection methods? The presence of patient education materials and readily available information on breast cancer risk factors are indicators of a practice's commitment to preventive care.
Standout practices within Spring Run, and the broader 17262 area, would be those demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive breast health. This includes not only adherence to screening guidelines but also the provision of resources for patients. Examples include dedicated nurses or staff members specializing in breast health, readily available educational materials, and partnerships with local specialists, such as radiologists and oncologists. These practices are likely to receive higher scores in this assessment.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments or initial consultations, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in geographically remote areas. Practices embracing telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and expanding access to care. The availability of virtual appointments for discussing screening results, addressing patient concerns, or providing general health advice contributes positively to the overall score.
Mental health resources are a crucial component of breast cancer care, often overlooked. A diagnosis of breast cancer, and the subsequent treatment, can be emotionally taxing. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, is vital for supporting patients throughout their journey. The availability of these resources, either within the primary care practice or through referrals to external specialists, is a significant factor in evaluating the overall quality of care. Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their patients receive higher scores.
The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, also contributes positively to the assessment. These groups provide a valuable platform for patients to connect with others facing similar challenges, offering emotional support and practical advice. Practices that actively promote and facilitate access to these support networks demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care.
Further, the analysis examines the availability of specialized breast cancer care within the broader 17262 area. This includes the presence of dedicated breast imaging centers, surgical oncologists, and medical oncologists. The proximity and accessibility of these specialists are crucial for ensuring timely diagnosis and treatment. The availability of these specialists, and the ease with which PCPs can refer patients to them, is a key factor in the overall score.
The coordination of care between primary care physicians and specialists is also critical. Does the practice have established referral pathways? Are there systems in place to ensure seamless communication between different healthcare providers? Effective care coordination ensures that patients receive the most appropriate and timely treatment.
The analysis also considers the patient experience. This includes factors such as wait times for appointments, the ease of scheduling, and the overall communication from the practice. Practices that prioritize patient satisfaction, and actively solicit feedback from their patients, are likely to receive higher scores.
The impact of insurance coverage on access to care is also considered. Are the primary care practices in Spring Run and the broader 17262 area accepting a wide range of insurance plans? Do they offer financial assistance programs for patients who are uninsured or underinsured? Ensuring that all patients have access to affordable care is a crucial component of a high-quality breast cancer care system.
Finally, the analysis considers the overall health of the community. This includes factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and environmental factors. These factors can all impact a patient's risk of developing breast cancer, and the overall effectiveness of care.
In conclusion, assessing the breast cancer care landscape in ZIP code 17262, particularly within the Spring Run area, requires a multi-faceted approach. Evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the overall patient experience is essential. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the current system.
For a visual representation of this data and a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps offer a powerful tool for visualizing the data discussed in this analysis, providing a clear and concise understanding of the breast cancer care landscape in ZIP code 17262.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like