The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 17366, Windsor, Pennsylvania is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.26 percent of the residents in 17366 has some form of health insurance. 25.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17366 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,561 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17366. An estimate of 53 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 858 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 14,228 health care providers accessible to residents in 17366, Windsor, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17366, Windsor, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 76 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 77 |
Hospital Score | 67 |
Travel Score | 66 |
17366 | Windsor | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The task is to create a hypothetical analysis. I cannot access real-time data like physician-to-patient ratios or specific practice details. This response will simulate the requested analysis based on publicly available information and common healthcare trends.
**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Windsor, PA (ZIP Code 17366)**
The focus here is on evaluating the quality and accessibility of breast cancer-related care in Windsor, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 17366), considering the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and other relevant factors. This analysis aims to provide a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" assessment, acknowledging the limitations of not having live, proprietary data.
The foundation of any effective breast cancer care system rests upon the availability of primary care physicians. PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients, playing a critical role in preventative screenings, early detection, and referrals to specialists. In Windsor, the availability of PCPs significantly impacts the overall "Breast Cancer Score." A higher concentration of PCPs, coupled with reasonable appointment wait times, would contribute positively to the score. Conversely, a shortage of PCPs or long wait times would negatively affect it, potentially delaying crucial screenings and diagnoses.
Hypothetically, let’s consider the physician-to-patient ratio in Windsor. If the ratio is unfavorable, meaning a relatively small number of PCPs serve a large population, the "Breast Cancer Score" would be penalized. This scarcity can lead to overburdened physicians, reduced time per patient, and potentially, less thorough examinations. The availability of specialists, such as oncologists and radiologists, is equally vital. Proximity to these specialists, or the ease of referral to them, is a crucial factor in determining the score.
Standout practices in the area are crucial. We need to consider factors such as the availability of digital mammography, the presence of certified breast health navigators, and the use of electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate information sharing between providers. Practices that actively promote breast cancer awareness and offer patient education programs would also receive higher marks. These practices should be assessed for their commitment to comprehensive care, including genetic counseling and access to clinical trials.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments and discussing test results, can improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility issues. Practices that have embraced telemedicine would contribute positively to the "Breast Cancer Score." This would be especially true if these practices offer secure video conferencing and patient portals for easy communication and information access.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are an integral part of breast cancer care. A diagnosis of breast cancer can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, is essential. The "Breast Cancer Score" would consider the availability of mental health services, including whether practices have integrated behavioral health specialists into their care teams or have established referral pathways to mental health providers. Support groups and patient advocacy programs also play a significant role in providing emotional support and empowering patients.
The hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" would also consider the availability of support services such as nutrition counseling, physical therapy, and financial assistance programs. These resources can significantly improve the quality of life for patients undergoing treatment and recovery. The presence of these services demonstrates a commitment to holistic care.
Furthermore, the analysis would examine the quality of local hospitals and imaging centers. Accreditation by reputable organizations, such as the American College of Radiology (ACR), would be a positive factor. The availability of advanced imaging technologies, such as 3D mammography (tomosynthesis), would also be considered. The timeliness of diagnostic testing and the accuracy of results are also crucial factors in assessing the overall quality of care.
The "Breast Cancer Score" analysis would also consider the patient experience. This includes factors such as the ease of scheduling appointments, the wait times in the waiting room, the clarity of communication from healthcare providers, and the overall level of patient satisfaction. Patient reviews and feedback would be considered, although the analysis would need to account for the potential for bias.
Another key factor is insurance coverage. The analysis would consider whether local practices accept a wide range of insurance plans and whether they offer financial assistance programs for patients who are uninsured or underinsured. The affordability of care is a significant barrier for many patients, and practices that are committed to providing accessible and affordable care would receive higher marks.
In addition to the factors mentioned above, the "Breast Cancer Score" would also consider the community's overall health and wellness initiatives. This includes factors such as the availability of healthy food options, the promotion of physical activity, and the prevalence of smoking and obesity. These factors can impact a patient's risk of developing breast cancer and their ability to recover from treatment.
Finally, the analysis would consider the local healthcare system's responsiveness to change. This includes factors such as the adoption of new technologies, the implementation of evidence-based practices, and the ongoing training and education of healthcare providers. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and practices that are committed to innovation and continuous improvement would receive higher marks.
The "Breast Cancer Score" is a hypothetical assessment, and its accuracy would depend on the availability of comprehensive and up-to-date data. The score would be a valuable tool for patients seeking breast cancer care in Windsor, Pennsylvania. It would provide them with a better understanding of the quality and accessibility of care in the area.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Windsor, PA, and surrounding areas, including the location of primary care physicians, specialists, and hospitals, explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides a powerful platform for visualizing and analyzing geographic data, allowing you to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare resources available in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like