17836, Leck Kill, Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 17836, Leck Kill, Pennsylvania is 93 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 78.92 percent of the residents in 17836 has some form of health insurance. 30.88 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17836 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 87 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 34 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17836. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 20 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,118 health care providers accessible to residents in 17836, Leck Kill, Pennsylvania.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17836 and Primary Care Availability in Leck Kill

This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 17836, encompassing the town of Leck Kill, Pennsylvania, and its surrounding areas. The goal is to assess the availability and quality of primary care services, a crucial element in early detection and ongoing management of breast cancer, along with the broader healthcare ecosystem. This assessment will consider physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all vital components of comprehensive breast cancer care.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in robust primary care. Regular screenings, such as mammograms, are often initiated and managed by primary care physicians (PCPs). The availability of PCPs directly impacts the accessibility of these vital screenings. In Leck Kill, a primarily rural area, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of PCPs, can lead to delayed diagnoses and reduced access to preventative care. This, in turn, can negatively impact breast cancer outcomes. A higher ratio, indicating more readily available PCPs, suggests a more favorable environment for early detection and intervention. However, simply having a higher ratio doesn't guarantee quality. The expertise, experience, and resources available within those practices are equally important.

Analyzing the specific practices within 17836 requires a deeper dive. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. First, the presence of board-certified physicians is paramount. Board certification signifies a commitment to rigorous standards of training and expertise. Second, the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as adherence to national guidelines for breast cancer screening and management, is crucial. Third, the availability of on-site services, such as mammography, can significantly improve patient convenience and streamline the diagnostic process. Practices that offer these services demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive care.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in healthcare, particularly in rural areas where geographical barriers can limit access to specialists. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in 17836 is a key consideration. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, potentially reducing the need for travel and facilitating timely access to expert opinions. This is particularly relevant for breast cancer patients who may require consultations with oncologists, surgeons, or other specialists. Assessing the extent to which practices utilize telemedicine platforms, including their ease of use and integration with existing patient portals, is essential.

Beyond the clinical aspects of care, the availability of mental health resources is critical for breast cancer patients. A diagnosis of breast cancer can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Primary care practices should ideally have established connections with mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, to provide patients with access to support services. This can include on-site counseling, referrals to local mental health providers, or the integration of mental health screenings into routine care. The presence of these resources is a strong indicator of a practice's commitment to holistic patient care.

Furthermore, understanding the insurance landscape in 17836 is essential. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance, directly impacts access to care for residents. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans are more accessible to a broader population. Similarly, the availability of financial assistance programs and resources for patients who are uninsured or underinsured is a crucial factor. Practices that actively assist patients in navigating the complexities of healthcare financing demonstrate a commitment to equitable care.

Evaluating the quality of care also involves examining patient satisfaction. Patient reviews and testimonials provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Positive reviews often highlight factors such as the physician's communication skills, the staff's responsiveness, and the overall quality of care. Conversely, negative reviews can reveal areas where practices may need to improve. Analyzing patient feedback is a critical component of assessing the overall quality of breast cancer care in the region.

The geographic distribution of primary care practices within 17836 is also important. Are practices clustered in certain areas, leaving other areas underserved? This spatial analysis can reveal potential disparities in access to care. The proximity of practices to patients, particularly those in more remote areas, can significantly impact their ability to receive timely care. Identifying areas with limited access can help inform strategies to improve healthcare delivery.

In addition to primary care, the availability of specialized breast cancer services, such as surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology, is a critical consideration. While these services may not be directly available within 17836, the proximity to these specialists in neighboring towns or cities is essential. The ease of access to these specialized services, including the availability of transportation and the coordination of care between primary care physicians and specialists, is a key factor in assessing the overall quality of breast cancer care.

The overall breast cancer score for doctors in 17836 and primary care availability in Leck Kill is complex and multifaceted. It is determined by a combination of factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, the insurance landscape, patient satisfaction, and the proximity to specialized breast cancer services. A comprehensive assessment requires a detailed analysis of each of these factors, taking into account the unique characteristics of the local healthcare environment.

To gain a more visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in 17836 and Leck Kill, consider exploring the power of spatial data. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic visualization of physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant data points. This will help you to better understand the access to care, identify potential disparities, and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.