The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 18211, Andreas, Pennsylvania is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.52 percent of the residents in 18211 has some form of health insurance. 45.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.46 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18211 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 225 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18211. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 279 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,716 health care providers accessible to residents in 18211, Andreas, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18211, Andreas, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 87 |
Provider Score | 54 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 53 |
18211 | Andreas | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below evaluates breast cancer care and primary care access within the specified geographic parameters. It considers various factors crucial for patient well-being, including physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, offering a nuanced perspective on the healthcare landscape.
**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18211 & Primary Care in Andreas**
The task of evaluating healthcare within a specific ZIP code and its surrounding area requires a multifaceted approach. Focusing on breast cancer care and primary care availability in ZIP code 18211 (Coaldale, PA) and the primary care landscape of Andreas, PA, necessitates a deep dive into the local healthcare ecosystem. This analysis will consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical components of a comprehensive healthcare system.
Assessing physician-to-patient ratios provides a fundamental understanding of accessibility. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to preventative care, including breast cancer screenings. Gathering data on the number of primary care physicians, oncologists, radiologists specializing in mammography, and surgeons within the designated area is the first step. Comparing this data to the population of ZIP code 18211 and the surrounding areas, including Andreas, reveals the density of healthcare providers. This data point is crucial because it directly impacts a patient's ability to receive timely care.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating the quality of care provided. This includes examining patient reviews, assessing the practice's accreditation status (e.g., accreditation by the American College of Radiology for mammography facilities), and reviewing data on patient outcomes. Practices that consistently demonstrate positive patient experiences, adhere to evidence-based guidelines for breast cancer screening and treatment, and offer comprehensive services (e.g., genetic counseling, survivorship programs) would be considered exemplary. The presence of these practices within or near the specified areas significantly enhances the overall healthcare score.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. Its ability to expand access to care is undeniable. Evaluating the extent to which practices in ZIP code 18211 and the Andreas area utilize telemedicine is crucial. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations for primary care, oncology, and other relevant specialties. Practices that offer telemedicine options can provide greater convenience for patients, reduce travel burdens, and improve access to specialists who may not be locally available. The ease of access to virtual appointments and the types of services offered via telemedicine directly affect the overall healthcare score.
The integration of mental health resources is another critical factor. Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging. The availability of mental health support services, such as counseling and support groups, is essential for patients' well-being. This analysis examines the presence of mental health professionals within the area, the availability of specialized support groups for breast cancer patients, and the integration of mental health services within primary care and oncology practices. Practices that proactively address patients' emotional needs and offer readily accessible mental health support receive a higher score.
Specific data collection is essential for a comprehensive analysis. This includes contacting local hospitals and clinics, reviewing publicly available data from healthcare organizations, and potentially surveying patients and healthcare providers. The goal is to gather detailed information on the availability of healthcare providers, the quality of care provided, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources.
The analysis would then need to be synthesized. The data collected would be analyzed to assign a "Breast Cancer Score" to the area. This score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of breast cancer care and primary care within the specified geographic parameters. The score would be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above, with each factor contributing to the overall assessment. The weighting of each factor would depend on its relative importance in determining the quality of care and access to services.
For example, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, excellent patient reviews, and a robust telemedicine program would receive a high score. Conversely, an area with a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited access to specialists, and a lack of mental health support would receive a lower score.
The analysis would need to consider the specific needs of the population. For example, if a significant portion of the population is elderly, the availability of geriatric specialists and home healthcare services would be particularly important. If the area has a large underserved population, the availability of financial assistance programs and culturally sensitive care would be crucial.
The analysis is not a static evaluation. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatments, and policies emerging. Therefore, the analysis would need to be updated regularly to reflect these changes. This would ensure that the "Breast Cancer Score" remains an accurate and relevant assessment of the healthcare environment.
The final report would provide a clear and concise overview of the healthcare situation in the specified area. It would highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system, identify areas for improvement, and provide recommendations for enhancing the quality and accessibility of care. The report would be a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
The success of this analysis depends on the availability of accurate and comprehensive data. Access to this data can be challenging, and the analysis may be limited by the availability of information. However, by utilizing all available resources and employing a rigorous methodology, it is possible to create a meaningful assessment of the healthcare landscape.
The "Breast Cancer Score" analysis provides a snapshot of the healthcare environment. It allows for a better understanding of the resources available to patients in ZIP code 18211 and the surrounding area. This understanding can empower individuals to make informed decisions about their healthcare. It can also inform healthcare providers and policymakers about areas that need improvement.
The value of such an analysis extends beyond the specific geographic area. The methodology can be adapted and applied to other regions, providing a valuable tool for assessing healthcare quality and access across the country. The goal is to improve healthcare outcomes and enhance the well-being of patients.
**Call to Action:**
For a visually compelling and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 18211 and Andreas, explore the power of geospatial data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Uncover insights, identify patterns, and make data-driven decisions. Visit CartoChrome today to unlock the potential of your healthcare data.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like