18225, Harleigh, Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 18225, Harleigh, Pennsylvania is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 18225 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18225 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18225. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,586 health care providers accessible to residents in 18225, Harleigh, Pennsylvania.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18225 and Primary Care Availability in Harleigh**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially concerning breast cancer care, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP code 18225, encompassing the town of Harleigh, Pennsylvania, and evaluates the landscape of primary care physicians (PCPs) and associated resources. This analysis will assess the availability of doctors, the quality of care, and the support systems available to patients, culminating in a 'Breast Cancer Score' assessment.

The first critical element is physician availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric. Determining the exact ratio in 18225 requires accessing up-to-date data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and local hospital systems. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can significantly hinder access to timely screenings, diagnoses, and treatment. This directly impacts the early detection and successful management of breast cancer.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of physicians matters. Are the PCPs concentrated in a single location, or are they dispersed throughout the ZIP code and surrounding areas? Geographic accessibility is a crucial factor, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those who lack reliable transportation. The presence of specialists, such as oncologists and radiologists, within a reasonable distance is also essential. The lack of these specialists would necessitate travel, adding to the burden on patients already facing a difficult diagnosis.

Primary care practices vary significantly in their capabilities. Some practices may have state-of-the-art equipment for mammograms, while others may rely on referrals to external facilities. The presence of on-site diagnostic services streamlines the process, reducing delays and improving patient convenience. Practices that actively promote preventative care, including regular breast cancer screenings, are vital. Their proactive approach can lead to earlier detection and better outcomes.

Telemedicine has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. The adoption of telemedicine by PCPs in 18225 can significantly improve access to care. Virtual consultations can reduce travel time and costs, making it easier for patients to connect with their doctors. Telemedicine can also facilitate access to specialists who may not be located locally. Furthermore, it can be used to provide ongoing support and monitoring for patients undergoing treatment.

Mental health support is a critical component of breast cancer care. A diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models are better equipped to support patients through their journey. This can improve the patient's overall quality of life and treatment adherence.

Identifying standout practices in the area is essential. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to excellence in breast cancer care. They may have achieved accreditation from organizations like the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC). These practices prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive services, and actively participate in clinical trials. They are the models for others to emulate.

The 'Breast Cancer Score' for 18225 is derived from a composite of these factors. It is not a simple numerical score but a qualitative assessment based on the data collected. The score considers physician-to-patient ratios, geographic accessibility, the availability of diagnostic services, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The presence of standout practices and their commitment to quality care also influences the score.

The score would be categorized as either: "Excellent," "Good," "Fair," or "Poor."

* **Excellent:** Indicates a robust healthcare infrastructure with a high physician-to-patient ratio, excellent geographic accessibility, comprehensive diagnostic services, widespread telemedicine adoption, strong mental health support, and multiple standout practices.
* **Good:** Suggests a generally adequate healthcare system with a reasonable physician-to-patient ratio, good geographic accessibility, adequate diagnostic services, some telemedicine adoption, and available mental health resources.
* **Fair:** Signifies challenges in accessing care, potentially with a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited geographic accessibility, inadequate diagnostic services, minimal telemedicine adoption, and limited mental health support.
* **Poor:** Represents a significant lack of resources, with a very low physician-to-patient ratio, poor geographic accessibility, absent diagnostic services, no telemedicine adoption, and a complete lack of mental health support.

The final 'Breast Cancer Score' for 18225 and the primary care availability in Harleigh would require a thorough investigation. This would involve gathering data from multiple sources, conducting site visits, and interviewing patients and healthcare providers.

This analysis highlights the complexity of assessing healthcare access and quality. It underscores the need for a comprehensive approach that considers not only the availability of physicians but also the quality of care, the support systems available to patients, and the impact of technology. The ultimate goal is to ensure that all patients, regardless of their location, have access to the best possible breast cancer care.

For a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, practice features, and patient demographics, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can transform complex healthcare data into interactive, easily understandable visualizations, aiding in understanding the geographic distribution of resources and identifying areas of need.