The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 18626, Laporte, Pennsylvania is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.06 percent of the residents in 18626 has some form of health insurance. 38.03 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18626 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 26 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18626. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 166 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 175 health care providers accessible to residents in 18626, Laporte, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18626, Laporte, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 39 |
---|---|
People Score | 95 |
Provider Score | 10 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 15 |
18626 | Laporte | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18626 and Primary Care in Laporte
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially concerning breast cancer care, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP Code 18626 (likely encompassing the Laporte area) to assess the landscape of primary care and its impact on breast cancer detection and treatment pathways. We will explore physician-to-patient ratios, identify potential standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all crucial factors in determining a "Breast Cancer Score" for this region.
The foundation of any effective breast cancer care system rests on accessible primary care. Regular check-ups, screenings, and referrals are essential for early detection, significantly improving patient outcomes. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, allowing for more proactive and timely care. Data sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the American Medical Association (AMA) can provide population figures and physician counts, enabling a calculation of this crucial ratio.
Within ZIP Code 18626, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is paramount. Are there enough general practitioners, internal medicine specialists, and family medicine doctors to meet the community's needs? Are these physicians accepting new patients? This information is vital for determining the overall accessibility of healthcare. A shortage of PCPs can create a bottleneck, hindering timely referrals to specialists like oncologists and radiologists, delaying crucial diagnostic procedures such as mammograms and biopsies.
Identifying standout practices requires delving deeper. This involves examining patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered, and evaluating the integration of technology. Practices that actively promote preventative care, including breast cancer screenings, and offer comprehensive services, such as on-site mammography or partnerships with local imaging centers, deserve recognition. Moreover, practices that emphasize patient education and provide clear communication regarding breast cancer risk factors, self-exams, and screening guidelines contribute to a higher "Breast Cancer Score."
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. Telehealth services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly enhance access to care, particularly in rural areas like Laporte. Practices that offer telemedicine options can reach a wider patient population, reduce travel burdens, and provide timely follow-up care. For breast cancer patients, telemedicine can be invaluable for post-operative care, medication management, and mental health support. The presence of telemedicine platforms and their ease of use contribute to a more favorable score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are a critical component of comprehensive breast cancer care. A breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally and psychologically challenging. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the community is crucial. Do local practices offer on-site counseling services, or do they have established referral networks with mental health providers? Access to support groups and educational programs focusing on coping mechanisms and emotional well-being is also essential. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan significantly improves the patient experience and contributes to a higher "Breast Cancer Score."
The "Breast Cancer Score" for ZIP Code 18626 is a composite measure reflecting the combined impact of all these factors. A high score indicates a robust healthcare system with ample access to primary care, proactive screening programs, readily available specialists, and supportive mental health resources. A low score suggests potential challenges, such as physician shortages, limited access to screenings, and inadequate mental health support. The score should not be viewed as a definitive judgment but as a tool for identifying areas for improvement and guiding healthcare initiatives.
Analyzing the data requires a methodical approach. Gathering information from various sources, including local hospitals, clinics, physician directories, and patient surveys, is essential. Examining the types of insurance accepted by local practices is also important, ensuring that care is accessible to a diverse population. The presence of bilingual staff and culturally sensitive healthcare practices further enhances the "Breast Cancer Score," ensuring that all residents receive equitable care.
Evaluating the quality of care also involves assessing patient outcomes. Tracking breast cancer incidence rates, survival rates, and rates of early detection can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of local healthcare services. Data from state health departments and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) can be used to analyze these metrics. Practices with higher survival rates and lower rates of late-stage diagnosis contribute to a more favorable score.
The assessment of primary care availability in Laporte requires a granular approach. Identifying the specific locations of primary care practices within the area, their hours of operation, and the types of services offered is crucial. This information, combined with data on physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, paints a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape. The goal is to determine whether the community has adequate access to timely, high-quality breast cancer care.
In conclusion, the "Breast Cancer Score" for ZIP Code 18626, and specifically Laporte, is a dynamic measure reflecting the complex interplay of various healthcare factors. A comprehensive analysis of physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources provides a valuable assessment of the community's ability to address breast cancer effectively. This assessment can inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members about areas of strength and areas needing improvement.
To visualize this data and understand the geographical distribution of healthcare resources in Laporte and surrounding areas, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that allow you to visualize physician locations, healthcare facilities, and demographic data, offering a powerful visual representation of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like