The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 19126, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.61 percent of the residents in 19126 has some form of health insurance. 46.31 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19126 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,166 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19126. An estimate of 108 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,493 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 105,490 health care providers accessible to residents in 19126, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19126, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 6 |
Provider Score | 98 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 65 |
19126 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Breast cancer, a disease affecting countless lives, demands a proactive approach to healthcare. This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 19126, a specific area within Philadelphia, and assesses primary care availability throughout the city. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately informing patients seeking quality care.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests on accessible and competent primary care physicians (PCPs). In Philadelphia, the availability of PCPs directly impacts a patient's ability to receive timely screenings, referrals, and ongoing support. Evaluating this availability requires considering several factors, including the physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial preventative measures like mammograms and clinical breast exams. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data from various sources, including the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Philadelphia Department of Public Health, must be analyzed to determine the current physician-to-patient ratio within 19126 and throughout Philadelphia. This data would then be compared to national averages to gauge the relative accessibility of primary care in this region.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices significantly impacts breast cancer outcomes. Standout practices are those that demonstrate a commitment to early detection and comprehensive patient care. This includes practices that actively promote screening guidelines, offer patient education materials, and foster a strong doctor-patient relationship. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively, allowing for seamless communication and coordination of care, are also highly valued. Specific practices within 19126 and Philadelphia would be evaluated based on these criteria. Publicly available data, patient reviews, and information from professional organizations like the American Medical Association (AMA) can be used to identify and rank these practices.
Telemedicine adoption has rapidly transformed healthcare delivery, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine offers several advantages in breast cancer care, including increased accessibility for patients in underserved areas, reduced travel time and costs, and the potential for remote monitoring and follow-up appointments. The extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care practices in 19126 and Philadelphia must be assessed. This involves determining which practices offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and secure patient portals. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and potentially improved access to care.
The emotional and psychological toll of a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment is substantial. Therefore, access to mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive care. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in oncology. Assessing the availability of these resources requires identifying mental health providers in the area, evaluating their expertise in breast cancer, and determining their acceptance of various insurance plans. Furthermore, collaborations between primary care practices and mental health providers are essential for seamless referrals and integrated care. The presence of support groups, both in-person and virtual, can provide invaluable emotional support for patients and their families.
Evaluating the breast cancer care landscape also involves examining the availability of specialized services, such as breast imaging centers and surgical oncologists. The proximity of these facilities to primary care practices and the ease with which patients can access them are crucial factors. The presence of accredited breast imaging centers, which adhere to rigorous quality standards, is particularly important. Similarly, access to experienced surgical oncologists who specialize in breast cancer treatment is essential for optimal outcomes. The review should identify the location of these specialized services within and around 19126, assessing their accessibility and the range of services they offer.
The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that can influence access to care. This includes the prevalence of health insurance coverage, the availability of transportation, and the cultural sensitivity of healthcare providers. Areas with a higher percentage of uninsured or underinsured individuals may face greater challenges in accessing timely and affordable breast cancer care. Transportation barriers can also limit access to screenings and treatment. Healthcare providers who are culturally competent and sensitive to the needs of diverse patient populations are more likely to provide equitable care.
In conclusion, a comprehensive assessment of breast cancer care in 19126 and Philadelphia involves evaluating primary care availability, the quality of practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and access to specialized services. By considering these factors, patients can make informed decisions about their healthcare and advocate for improvements in the system. The findings should highlight areas of strength, identify gaps in care, and suggest potential solutions to enhance breast cancer outcomes.
To visualize and understand the complex landscape of breast cancer care in Philadelphia, including the location of practices, the distribution of resources, and the availability of services, explore the power of spatial data. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive platform to visualize this information, enabling patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to gain valuable insights and make data-driven decisions. Visit CartoChrome to explore the possibilities and gain a deeper understanding of breast cancer care in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like