The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 02886, Warwick, Rhode Island is 95 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.34 percent of the residents in 02886 has some form of health insurance. 34.61 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02886 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,071 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 13 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02886. An estimate of 9 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,709 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 7,529 health care providers accessible to residents in 02886, Warwick, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02886, Warwick, Rhode Island
Breast Cancer Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 43 |
Provider Score | 95 |
Hospital Score | 47 |
Travel Score | 67 |
02886 | Warwick | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Warwick, RI (ZIP Code 02886) & Primary Care Availability
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer care within ZIP code 02886 (Warwick, Rhode Island), focusing on primary care physician (PCP) access, specialist availability, and related support services. It aims to provide an assessment of the local healthcare landscape, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for potential improvement. The analysis will consider factors influencing early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and overall patient well-being.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests on accessible and proactive primary care. In Warwick, evaluating PCP availability is crucial. This involves assessing the physician-to-patient ratio, considering the number of PCPs actively practicing within the specified ZIP code and the overall population. A higher ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, generally translates to easier access for appointments, preventive screenings, and timely referrals. Conversely, a lower ratio can lead to longer wait times, potentially delaying crucial early detection efforts. Publicly available data from sources like the Rhode Island Department of Health or the U.S. Census Bureau can be used to calculate this ratio.
Beyond simple numbers, the type of primary care practices and their operational models are important. Do the practices offer extended hours, including evenings or weekends? Do they have same-day appointment availability for urgent concerns? Do they have efficient systems for managing patient records and communicating results? Practices that embrace technology, such as patient portals for accessing medical information and scheduling appointments, often enhance patient convenience and engagement.
The presence of standout primary care practices within Warwick is another critical factor. These practices may be recognized for their commitment to preventative care, patient education, and proactive screening protocols. Identifying these practices requires examining patient reviews, assessing their participation in quality improvement initiatives, and evaluating their adherence to national guidelines for breast cancer screening.
The availability of specialists, particularly oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons, is paramount for timely diagnosis and treatment. Assessing the concentration of these specialists within or near ZIP code 02886 is vital. This includes evaluating the number of specialists, their areas of expertise, and their affiliations with local hospitals and cancer centers. Proximity to comprehensive cancer centers, offering multidisciplinary care, advanced treatment options, and clinical trials, significantly impacts patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role in healthcare delivery, particularly in areas like oncology. The availability of telehealth consultations with oncologists, radiologists, and other specialists can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those residing in geographically underserved areas. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption among local practices and hospitals is essential.
Mental health support is a crucial, yet often overlooked, component of breast cancer care. The emotional and psychological toll of a diagnosis, treatment, and recovery can be significant. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, within the community is a key indicator of comprehensive care. Assessing the presence of these resources, their accessibility, and their integration with medical care is essential.
The analysis must also consider the availability of resources for financial assistance, transportation, and other support services. Breast cancer patients often face significant financial burdens, and access to resources that can alleviate these burdens is critical. This includes information on grants, insurance coverage, and patient advocacy groups. Transportation assistance is also important, especially for patients who may have difficulty traveling to appointments.
Furthermore, the analysis should assess the level of patient education and awareness initiatives within the community. Are there programs to educate women about breast cancer risk factors, screening guidelines, and the importance of early detection? Are there community outreach programs to increase awareness and promote screening among underserved populations?
The overall quality of care also depends on the coordination and communication between different healthcare providers. This includes the seamless transfer of medical records, the timely sharing of test results, and the effective communication between primary care physicians, specialists, and other members of the care team.
To conduct a comprehensive analysis, several data sources should be consulted. These include publicly available databases from the Rhode Island Department of Health, the U.S. Census Bureau, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and professional medical organizations. Patient reviews, hospital websites, and local community resources can also provide valuable insights.
The analysis should be conducted objectively, avoiding bias and focusing on evidence-based information. The findings should be presented in a clear and concise manner, highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape. The analysis should also identify areas for potential improvement, such as increasing the number of PCPs, expanding telemedicine services, or enhancing mental health support.
The ultimate goal of this analysis is to provide a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and community stakeholders. By identifying areas of strength and weakness, the analysis can help to improve the quality of breast cancer care in Warwick and promote better health outcomes for all residents.
To visualize and explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, specialist availability, and the location of support services, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide an interactive platform for visualizing and analyzing spatial data, allowing you to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Warwick and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like