The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 29438, Edisto Island, South Carolina is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.63 percent of the residents in 29438 has some form of health insurance. 54.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.46 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29438 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 170 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29438. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,038 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 117 health care providers accessible to residents in 29438, Edisto Island, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29438, Edisto Island, South Carolina
Breast Cancer Score | 48 |
---|---|
People Score | 86 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 69 |
Travel Score | 15 |
29438 | Edisto Island | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Edisto Island (ZIP Code 29438)
Edisto Island, South Carolina, presents a unique challenge when assessing healthcare accessibility, particularly regarding breast cancer care. Its geographical isolation and relatively small population (estimated around 1,000 residents) necessitate a nuanced analysis beyond simple metrics. This analysis focuses on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and standout practices within and serving the 29438 ZIP code, culminating in a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score."
The foundation of any effective breast cancer care system rests on accessible primary care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are crucial for preventative screenings, early detection, and referrals to specialists. Edisto Island, being a rural community, likely faces challenges in this area. The "Breast Cancer Score" would reflect the availability of PCPs per capita. A low score would indicate a scarcity of PCPs, potentially forcing residents to travel significant distances for routine checkups and breast cancer screenings. The score would consider the number of PCPs within the 29438 ZIP code and the surrounding areas, factoring in travel time and ease of access.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. A high ratio, meaning a small number of physicians serving a large population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses. The "Breast Cancer Score" would incorporate the physician-to-patient ratio for PCPs and, importantly, for specialists such as oncologists and radiologists who are essential for breast cancer treatment. The proximity of these specialists to Edisto Island is a key component of the score. If patients must travel long distances for specialized care, the score would be negatively impacted.
Telemedicine offers a potential solution to the geographical challenges faced by Edisto Island. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices and specialist providers is a vital factor in the "Breast Cancer Score." Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and access to specialists who may not be physically located on the island. A high score would reflect the widespread availability of telemedicine services, including the ease of use of the technology and the patient's access to reliable internet connectivity.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but crucial aspect of breast cancer care. A diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The "Breast Cancer Score" would evaluate the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, in the area. This would include the availability of in-person and telehealth options. The score would also consider the integration of mental health services into the overall cancer care plan, such as the availability of support groups and counseling services specifically for breast cancer patients.
Identifying "standout practices" is a key aspect of the analysis. This involves researching practices that demonstrate a commitment to breast cancer care. The "Breast Cancer Score" would recognize practices that offer comprehensive services, including early detection programs, advanced imaging technologies, and patient navigation services. It would also consider patient satisfaction scores, the practice's use of evidence-based guidelines, and its participation in clinical trials. These practices would be highlighted as examples of excellence in breast cancer care within the region.
The hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" would be a composite of these factors. It would not be a single number, but rather a graded assessment, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in providing breast cancer care to the residents of Edisto Island. A low score would indicate significant challenges, such as limited access to primary care, a scarcity of specialists, and a lack of telemedicine and mental health resources. A high score would reflect a robust and accessible healthcare system, with a strong emphasis on prevention, early detection, and comprehensive treatment.
The "Breast Cancer Score" for Edisto Island would likely be moderate, given the challenges of rural healthcare. The score would reflect the need for improvements in several areas, including increasing the number of PCPs and specialists, expanding telemedicine services, and enhancing mental health support. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and government agencies is crucial to improving the "Breast Cancer Score" and ensuring that residents of Edisto Island have access to the best possible breast cancer care.
This analysis, while hypothetical, highlights the complexities of assessing healthcare access in a rural community. It emphasizes the importance of considering factors beyond simple metrics and the need for a holistic approach to healthcare planning and delivery. The "Breast Cancer Score" is a tool that could be used to identify areas for improvement and to guide efforts to enhance breast cancer care for the residents of Edisto Island.
The "Breast Cancer Score" would be dynamic, evolving as healthcare services and resources change. It would be regularly updated to reflect the latest developments and to ensure that it remains an accurate assessment of the healthcare landscape. The score would also be used to advocate for policy changes and to promote initiatives that improve access to breast cancer care.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Edisto Island and the surrounding areas, consider exploring the power of geospatial analysis. CartoChrome maps offer a visual representation of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital locations, and the availability of various services. These maps can reveal patterns and insights that are not readily apparent from simple data tables. They can help to identify areas with limited access to care and to inform decisions about resource allocation and healthcare planning.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like