29493, Williams, South Carolina Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 29493, Williams, South Carolina is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.03 percent of the residents in 29493 has some form of health insurance. 46.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.62 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29493 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 40 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29493. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 38 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 380 health care providers accessible to residents in 29493, Williams, South Carolina.

Please note: I am an AI and cannot provide medical advice, nor can I endorse specific medical professionals. This analysis is hypothetical and based on publicly available information, and should not be considered a substitute for professional medical consultation. Furthermore, I do not have real-time access to dynamic data like physician availability.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 29493 and Williams, SC**

This analysis explores factors relevant to breast cancer care within ZIP code 29493 (hypothetical) and the broader context of primary care availability in Williams, South Carolina. The goal is to provide a hypothetical "Breast Cancer Score" assessment, considering various elements impacting patient access and quality of care. This analysis will not provide a numerical score, but rather a qualitative evaluation based on available information and hypothetical scenarios.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care begins with accessible and robust primary care. Williams, SC, a smaller community, may face challenges in primary care availability. A critical factor is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians, can lead to delayed diagnoses, missed screenings, and overall poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access to preventative care, including breast cancer screenings and early detection. The analysis assumes a hypothetical scenario where the physician-to-patient ratio in Williams is slightly below the national average, posing a potential access challenge.

Within ZIP code 29493, the availability of primary care providers is assessed. The analysis considers the number of family medicine, internal medicine, and general practice physicians accepting new patients. The geographic distribution of these practices within the ZIP code is also considered. Are the practices concentrated in one area, potentially limiting access for residents in other parts of the ZIP code? Do these practices offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate patients' schedules?

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is evaluated. This includes factors like the use of electronic health records (EHRs), which facilitate communication and coordination of care. EHRs enable physicians to quickly access patient histories, lab results, and imaging reports, streamlining the diagnostic process. Furthermore, the analysis considers the primary care physicians' familiarity with breast cancer screening guidelines, their proactive approach to recommending mammograms, and their ability to educate patients about risk factors and early detection strategies.

Specialized breast cancer care is also a critical component. The analysis examines the availability of oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons specializing in breast cancer within a reasonable driving distance of ZIP code 29493. The presence of a comprehensive cancer center, offering multidisciplinary care including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive services, significantly enhances the Breast Cancer Score. The proximity to such a center is a major factor.

The analysis also considers the reputation and performance of specific practices. Are there any standout practices known for their expertise in breast cancer care? This could be based on patient reviews, physician recognition, or accreditation by organizations like the American College of Surgeons. These practices are evaluated on their commitment to patient-centered care, their use of advanced technologies, and their participation in clinical trials.

Telemedicine adoption is another important aspect of the analysis. The ability to offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and psychological support can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The availability of telemedicine services is assessed, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are crucial for breast cancer patients. A diagnosis of breast cancer can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. The analysis evaluates the availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in oncology and can provide support to patients and their families. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan is considered. Does the practice offer on-site counseling, or do they have strong referral networks?

The analysis also considers the availability of support groups and patient education programs. Support groups provide a valuable forum for patients to connect with others who have experienced similar challenges. Patient education programs empower patients to make informed decisions about their care and understand their treatment options. The existence of these resources is a positive factor in the Breast Cancer Score.

Furthermore, the analysis examines the availability of financial assistance programs and resources for patients who may be struggling to afford their care. Breast cancer treatment can be expensive, and financial barriers can prevent patients from accessing necessary services. The analysis considers the practice's awareness of and assistance with these programs.

The overall score considers the interplay of all these factors. A high score would indicate excellent access to primary care, a strong network of specialists, a commitment to patient-centered care, and readily available mental health and support resources. A lower score would suggest potential challenges in accessing care, such as a shortage of physicians, limited access to specialists, or a lack of supportive services.

In conclusion, assessing the "Breast Cancer Score" for a region requires a holistic evaluation of various factors. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the complexities of breast cancer care in a specific geographic area. While this analysis is hypothetical, it highlights the importance of accessible primary care, specialized breast cancer services, mental health support, and patient education in delivering high-quality care.

For a visual representation of the factors discussed, including the geographic distribution of physicians, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize the data and identify areas with the greatest need for resources.