The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 29567, Little Rock, South Carolina is 30 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.43 percent of the residents in 29567 has some form of health insurance. 55.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 26.97 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29567 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 81 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29567. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 128 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 503 health care providers accessible to residents in 29567, Little Rock, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29567, Little Rock, South Carolina
Breast Cancer Score | 17 |
---|---|
People Score | 32 |
Provider Score | 30 |
Hospital Score | 43 |
Travel Score | 34 |
29567 | Little Rock | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29567 & Primary Care Availability in Little Rock
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer care within ZIP Code 29567 and assesses the primary care landscape in Little Rock, Arkansas, considering factors that impact a patient's journey from screening to survivorship. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, explore telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the presence of mental health resources, ultimately providing a "Breast Cancer Score" assessment.
**ZIP Code 29567: A Focused Examination**
ZIP Code 29567, likely a specific area within a larger region, requires a localized approach. Analyzing the availability of breast cancer specialists, including oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists, is paramount. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer specialists relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and potentially poorer outcomes. Data from sources like the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Medical Association (AMA) are crucial for determining these ratios. Specific practices within 29567 need careful scrutiny. Are there any practices that demonstrate superior patient outcomes, innovative treatment approaches, or a commitment to patient-centered care? This could be gauged through patient reviews, accreditations from organizations like the American College of Surgeons (ACS), and the availability of comprehensive services, such as genetic counseling and support groups.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Does the area have practices offering virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, or even initial consultations? Telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas, reducing travel burdens and facilitating more frequent communication with healthcare providers.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are vital. Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally taxing. The availability of on-site or readily accessible mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and therapists, is essential for supporting patients throughout their journey. Does the area have access to support groups, counseling services, and resources for managing anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges?
**Little Rock: Primary Care as a Foundation**
The primary care landscape in Little Rock plays a pivotal role in breast cancer detection and early intervention. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and their commitment to preventative care, including breast cancer screening, is crucial. A high physician-to-patient ratio in primary care, signifying a good supply of PCPs, can improve access to routine check-ups and screenings, leading to earlier detection of potential problems.
The practices in Little Rock must be evaluated for their screening practices. Do they adhere to the latest guidelines for mammograms and other screening methods? Do they proactively remind patients about screenings and offer convenient scheduling options? Are they connected to specialists and provide prompt referrals when necessary?
Telemedicine’s influence on primary care in Little Rock needs assessment. Are PCPs offering virtual appointments for follow-up care, medication refills, and even some types of initial consultations? Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those who live in areas with limited access to healthcare facilities.
The mental health infrastructure in Little Rock’s primary care practices is also important. Are PCPs trained to recognize and address the mental health needs of their patients? Do they have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, ensuring that patients receive the support they need?
**Scoring Methodology and Considerations**
A "Breast Cancer Score" for each location would be a composite metric, incorporating several factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of accredited practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources would all be weighted and combined to generate a score. The specific weighting of each factor would depend on its relative importance in influencing patient outcomes. For instance, the availability of specialists and early screening programs might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, although telemedicine is still important.
Data sources would include government databases (e.g., the NCI, CDC), professional organizations (e.g., the AMA, ACS), insurance claims data (if available), and patient surveys. Patient reviews and feedback would be essential for assessing the quality of care and the patient experience.
**Challenges and Limitations**
Gathering comprehensive and accurate data can be challenging. Data availability can vary by location and may not always be up-to-date. Patient privacy concerns must be carefully considered when collecting and analyzing data. The subjective nature of patient experiences and the difficulty of quantifying certain factors, such as the quality of communication between doctors and patients, pose additional challenges.
**Conclusion**
Assessing the breast cancer care landscape in specific locations like ZIP Code 29567 and Little Rock is crucial for understanding the challenges and opportunities for improving patient outcomes. This analysis highlights the importance of physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. By understanding these factors, we can identify areas where improvements are needed and develop strategies to enhance access to care and support for breast cancer patients.
**Take Action with CartoChrome Maps**
Are you interested in visualizing this data and exploring the breast cancer care landscape in your area? CartoChrome Maps provides interactive mapping solutions that can help you analyze physician locations, patient demographics, and healthcare resource availability. Visit CartoChrome Maps today to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like