The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 26404, Meadowbrook, West Virginia is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 72.96 percent of the residents in 26404 has some form of health insurance. 39.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 33.91 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26404 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 63 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26404. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 619 health care providers accessible to residents in 26404, Meadowbrook, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26404, Meadowbrook, West Virginia
Breast Cancer Score | 84 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 63 |
Hospital Score | 61 |
Travel Score | 79 |
26404 | Meadowbrook | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Meadowbrook, WV (ZIP Code 26404)
This analysis delves into the landscape of breast cancer care within Meadowbrook, West Virginia (ZIP code 26404), focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, physician resources, and related support systems. The aim is to provide a "Breast Cancer Score" assessment, recognizing that this is a complex issue influenced by various factors beyond simple numerical rankings.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests upon accessible and competent primary care. In Meadowbrook, evaluating primary care availability involves examining the number of practicing physicians, the patient-to-physician ratio, and the ease of scheduling appointments. A high patient-to-physician ratio could indicate potential challenges in accessing timely care, including preventative screenings and initial consultations. Conversely, a low ratio suggests greater availability, potentially leading to improved early detection and management. The analysis would need to identify the specific primary care practices within the ZIP code, assess their patient load, and evaluate patient feedback regarding appointment scheduling and wait times.
Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the physicians' familiarity with breast cancer risk factors, their commitment to preventative screenings (mammograms, clinical breast exams), and their ability to educate patients about self-examination techniques. The analysis would investigate whether primary care providers routinely discuss family history, lifestyle factors, and other relevant information that could influence breast cancer risk. Furthermore, the analysis would evaluate the practices' adherence to national guidelines for breast cancer screening and referral protocols.
The presence of standout practices within the ZIP code significantly impacts the overall score. Identifying practices that demonstrate exceptional commitment to breast cancer prevention and early detection is crucial. These practices might be recognized for their proactive approach to patient education, their utilization of advanced screening technologies, or their strong relationships with specialists in radiology and oncology. The analysis would need to identify such practices, examining their patient outcomes, their participation in community outreach programs, and their overall reputation within the community.
Telemedicine adoption presents another key factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations for initial assessments, follow-up appointments, and mental health support can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients who face geographical or logistical barriers. The analysis would investigate the extent to which primary care practices in Meadowbrook have adopted telemedicine platforms, the types of services offered virtually, and the patient satisfaction levels with these services. Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially improve patient access and convenience, which can positively impact the "Breast Cancer Score."
Mental health resources are integral to the holistic care of breast cancer patients. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can have profound psychological impacts, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. The analysis would assess the availability of mental health services within the ZIP code, including therapists, counselors, and support groups. The assessment would examine whether primary care practices have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, and whether there are resources available to support patients throughout their treatment journey. Strong integration of mental health services would significantly enhance the "Breast Cancer Score."
Beyond primary care, access to specialized breast cancer care is critical. This includes access to qualified radiologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists. The analysis would assess the proximity of these specialists to Meadowbrook, the availability of appointments, and the reputation of the specialists within the medical community. It would also evaluate the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies, such as 3D mammography, breast MRI, and targeted therapies. Proximity to comprehensive cancer centers and the quality of care provided by specialists directly influence the "Breast Cancer Score."
The analysis would also consider the role of community resources. The availability of support groups, patient navigation programs, and educational resources can significantly improve the patient experience and outcomes. The analysis would investigate the presence of organizations such as the American Cancer Society or local support groups that offer assistance to breast cancer patients. Access to these resources can help patients navigate the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery, which can positively impact the "Breast Cancer Score."
Furthermore, the analysis would consider the demographic characteristics of the population in Meadowbrook. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can influence breast cancer risk and access to care. The analysis would consider these factors to ensure that the assessment is sensitive to the needs of all residents. This includes considering the potential for health disparities and the need for culturally competent care.
Overall, the "Breast Cancer Score" for Meadowbrook (ZIP code 26404) would be a composite measure, reflecting the interplay of various factors. It would consider the availability and quality of primary care, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, access to specialized care, the presence of community resources, and the demographic characteristics of the population. The score would not be a single number but rather a nuanced assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
In conclusion, this analysis provides a framework for evaluating the breast cancer care landscape in Meadowbrook. The complexity of this issue requires a multifaceted approach. The "Breast Cancer Score" assessment is a starting point for understanding the resources available to patients and identifying opportunities to improve access to quality care.
To visualize the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and other relevant data points, consider exploring interactive maps. CartoChrome maps offer powerful tools for visualizing and analyzing geographic data, allowing for a deeper understanding of healthcare access within Meadowbrook and the surrounding areas. Visit CartoChrome maps today to gain a comprehensive spatial perspective on breast cancer care in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like